A. The point is you are not only losing potential jobs in the short term, but as these systems catch on your losing jobs in the long term and that is bad for the economy.
B. Amazon is a publicly traded company. They operate in the best interest of their shareholders, not their customers. Their job is to make money, full stop. This "convenience" is nearly a means to an end. If this wasn't aimed at making money down the line they wouldn't do it, and if you can't see that then it is probably impossible to have a reasonable conversation with you on this topic.
C. Of course it isn't Amazon's responsibility, their only responsibility is to make money for the company and its shareholders. What I'm saying however is that these practices may be good for Amazon and other corporations, but it's bad for the country and society as a whole.
A. And? Is Amazon supposed to stop innovating and creating value/convenience for shoppers because people who lack skills need jobs? People without desireable skills will always need jobs. Amazon is not the caretaker for the economy. The world is changing. Unless you plan on creating government bans on innovation & technology, people will need to adjust.
B. In attempting to be clever by trying to throw a statement I made back in my face, you've wasted your time and mine. Of course Amazon is publicly traded. Of course they have a responsibility to their shareholders. Hoorah for pointing out the obvious. The sky is also (sometimes) blue. What's salient is that creating value for customers is the prime mover in the equation, not just a "means to an end". It's the whole point. In the long term, operating in the best interest of their customers
is in the best interest of their shareholders. Companies that focus on shareholder value without creating long-term customer value will always be vulnerable to companies that make consumers happier. That's how it works.
C. How exactly can these practices be good for Amazon and "other corporations" and bad for society as a whole? If there is not also some real, tangible benefit for consumers then some savvy retailer will fill that void and create a way of selling products that consumers and society do like better. That's how it works.
And honestly, if we "as a society" can't think of something better for people to do than stand in one spot for 8 hours a day swiping products over a scanner so that a machine can add up a shopper's total bill, then we "as a society" are f-ed and should just give up now.
[doublepost=1480973281][/doublepost]
I dreamed up something like this probably 8-10 years ago - every product would have an RFID tag and as such when passed by a sensor would get detected and automatically paid for.
Was cool idea to me, still is, but now that I'm older it seems a bit creepy...
It is a clever idea—you were just ahead of your time. Unfortunately, "progress" and "creepy" seem to be getting kinda chummy these days. Especially in information tech.