Damn that was a bold stereotype. Even though I know people that live check to check with iPhones barley keeping the service on.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Launching Larger, Low-Cost iPhone for Emerging Markets Late This Year?
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Damn that was a bold stereotype. Even though I know people that live check to check with iPhones barley keeping the service on.
Maybe its just me - but I've never really understood the well-trodden opinion that iPhones with various screen sizes would prove too much of an issue for developers. Android screen sizes are all over the place, and nowadays there aren't any issues there.
For me it looks plausible and in the end inevitable, cheaper and larger iPhones are a certainty some day.
Bigger is better (for some consumers), cheaper but larger hardware, heavier, and the same pixel size of the 4S so no need for yet another resolution. I dig!
Bigger is better (for some consumers), cheaper but larger hardware, heavier, and the same pixel size of the 4S so no need for yet another resolution. I dig!
Android's ability to make it into the hands of people who aren't willing to spend as much on a smartphone is beneficial to Android as a whole...I feel like you miss that.
Why do you think Android's activation numbers are so high? Why is Android more appealing to developers who want to reach the widest audience?
Because Android is on low-end as well as high-end devices.
Think of it this way - if Apple were to make a low-end smartphone, more people would begin to use iPhones. That means more of your friends would be on iMessage and more people would be contributing data to services like Live Traffic on Apple's maps.
If true, Apple is responding to the pressure applied by Samsung.
This is very encouraging, it proves the need for competition. In addition, if Apple remains in denial and does not respond, they are going to pay the price. Sooner, or later.
I'd like nothing better than to see Apple innovate once again. Show the world just what they are capable of besides throwing buckets of money at lawyers to litigate and block other companies from selling their products.
Apple was once better than this, it'd be great to see them get back to building fresh innovative new products.
This is very encouraging, it proves the need for competition. In addition, if Apple remains in denial and does not respond, they are going to pay the price. Sooner, or later.
I'd like nothing better than to see Apple innovate once again. Show the world just what they are capable of besides throwing buckets of money at lawyers to litigate and block other companies from selling their products.
Apple was once better than this, it'd be great to see them get back to building fresh innovative new products.
I've owned an iPhone 3GS for a whole year now, so I am fully qualified to rebuke this "news" article.
No part of it has any credence in our reality.
Low cost? Apple didn't even make their iPad Mini "low cost". A new iPhone, larger than the original - for lower cost? Rubbish!
Larger screen? Apple marketed the fact that their iPhone can be used comfortably with your thumb. They're hardly going to now go and make a huge iPhone. Steve would roll in his grave.
Emerging Markets? As if Apple cares? Know how much money they're making selling to 1st World economies? Enough to be the richest company in the world. Who needs emerging markets full of penniless farmers and so forth.
No part of it has any credence in our reality.
Low cost? Apple didn't even make their iPad Mini "low cost". A new iPhone, larger than the original - for lower cost? Rubbish!
Larger screen? Apple marketed the fact that their iPhone can be used comfortably with your thumb. They're hardly going to now go and make a huge iPhone. Steve would roll in his grave.
Emerging Markets? As if Apple cares? Know how much money they're making selling to 1st World economies? Enough to be the richest company in the world. Who needs emerging markets full of penniless farmers and so forth.
There really aren't. The problem is that many iOS apps were developed for the original iPhone size, and in many cases used heavily bitmapped GUIs to look pretty. People do that a lot with websites, and once you've done it, it's kinda hard to change it.
I imagine once the developers have adjusted the app to work on the longer iphone, hopefully they've made their app UIs smarter
Seems to me this is a knee jerk reaction from Wall Street "analysts" who are freaked out about Samsung's market share and think Apple has to counter it with a cheap smartphone for China. Apple never built a cheap PC to compete with Microsoft, why do they need to build a cheap phone to compete with Android OEM's?
I know more than one person on government assistance who has an iPhone. LOL. High class is right.
I bet it looks terrible with that low DPI but the screen size is what people will buy it for.
I have both of those phones pictured there...
Hated my iPhone 5 at the beginning, but now I love it.
Would love more phone models from Apple. So they would have more on the market. 1 new phone a year is not enough now a days. They get old to customers within 4 month. And then there is 8 month left where nothing new happens.
A big iPhone ? I would love it But pleeeease make iOS 7 new. Not just the same and same and same. My iPhone 3 looks the same... So gi' me' something new
Hated my iPhone 5 at the beginning, but now I love it.
Would love more phone models from Apple. So they would have more on the market. 1 new phone a year is not enough now a days. They get old to customers within 4 month. And then there is 8 month left where nothing new happens.
A big iPhone ? I would love it
But pleeeease make iOS 7 new. Not just the same and same and same. My iPhone 3 looks the same... So gi' me' something new 
As much as I like the iPhone, I think it's overpriced. Apple, as we all know, has huge markups on the iPhone and generates by far the majority of their profits from the iPhone, and that has yielded this mountain of cash they now sit on. So why, asks Apple investors, would Apple want to lower the price? They don't really need to of coursethey can continue to market it as a high-end device, and lead the industry in profitability for some years to come. But they're fast losing marketshare, and it's a valid question to ask how much of that is linked to price.
But I question the wisdom of bringing out a cheaper, lower spec, lower build-quality iPhone to please the masses. It won't appeal to the people who are drawn to the higher specs of competing products, and it may have a negative halo effect on the brand as a whole.
I also question the wisdom of bringing out a larger phone to please the masses. Product differentiation is okay, and Apple has defended their decision to keep the width of the phone down, which I happen to agree with.
What I would like to see is Apple price the next iPhone more competitively, and give up some of that massive markup they've been holding onto. They could arguably do this (as they've done in the past with various products) by doubling storage at the high end while keeping the price the same. Or they could simply reduce prices across the whole product line. Perhaps it's approaching time they did bothif they have any interest in stopping the slide into the realm of small niche market that is.
You seem very certain about that. Where's your research? Perhaps a lot of people have purchased larger Android phones for other reasonsafter all, we're constantly told that they have other features the iPhone doesn't. Price and sales spiels can heavily influence buyers too. And some people just buy what their friends or family members have. Others just have a religious aversion to all things Apple.
Fads come and go, but enduring strategies take time to see clearly. Once upon a time it was cool to have the smallest phone. Early mobile phones where huge bricks, and they got smaller and smaller, with boasting rights (and expense) belonging to the very smallest phone on the market. Now it's shifted the other way, but it's not a universal trend. I'll wager it's more of a temporary fad than you and many other realise, but it's really too early to say.
But I question the wisdom of bringing out a cheaper, lower spec, lower build-quality iPhone to please the masses. It won't appeal to the people who are drawn to the higher specs of competing products, and it may have a negative halo effect on the brand as a whole.
I also question the wisdom of bringing out a larger phone to please the masses. Product differentiation is okay, and Apple has defended their decision to keep the width of the phone down, which I happen to agree with.
What I would like to see is Apple price the next iPhone more competitively, and give up some of that massive markup they've been holding onto. They could arguably do this (as they've done in the past with various products) by doubling storage at the high end while keeping the price the same. Or they could simply reduce prices across the whole product line. Perhaps it's approaching time they did bothif they have any interest in stopping the slide into the realm of small niche market that is.
You seem very certain about that. Where's your research? Perhaps a lot of people have purchased larger Android phones for other reasonsafter all, we're constantly told that they have other features the iPhone doesn't. Price and sales spiels can heavily influence buyers too. And some people just buy what their friends or family members have. Others just have a religious aversion to all things Apple.
Fads come and go, but enduring strategies take time to see clearly. Once upon a time it was cool to have the smallest phone. Early mobile phones where huge bricks, and they got smaller and smaller, with boasting rights (and expense) belonging to the very smallest phone on the market. Now it's shifted the other way, but it's not a universal trend. I'll wager it's more of a temporary fad than you and many other realise, but it's really too early to say.
Of course they care about marketshare. They are not stupid. More devices sold means lower component costs. Higher marketshare means more incentive for developers to write apps. It means you're in a much better position when you bargain with media companies about distribution rights. And so on.
They may care about profit more than marketshare, but that's hardly anything out of the ordinary.
----------
Uhm yeah. Exactly the reason why 17" laptops are so much more popular with the lower-class than 13".
Also, ever been to China or Russia? They think quite differently about size of jewelry than you do.
What??? I read several days ago the opposite, Apple will launch a cheaper SMALLER iPhone. Which I have to say makes a hell of a lot more sense to me, I mean Apple is going to launch a bigger phone that's..... cheaper! Yeah right..
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57562025-37/apple-could-launch-iphone-mini-next-year-analyst-says/
http://www.stuff.tv/news/apple-news/rumour-mill/apple-iphone-mini-due-this-year
I trust CNET 10000 times more the Digitimes..
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57562025-37/apple-could-launch-iphone-mini-next-year-analyst-says/
http://www.stuff.tv/news/apple-news/rumour-mill/apple-iphone-mini-due-this-year
I trust CNET 10000 times more the Digitimes..
On the size preference, not all android users want big screen phones, some merely want high end hardware.
Unfortunately android offers no high end smaller sized phones.
It's a huge market untapped.
They dropped the ball with the galaxy s 3 mini, they dumbed down the specs instead of making a real galaxy s3 mini.
Honestly I think the gs3 is the perfect phone size but my wife has small hands, people like her and people who wear women's jeans say it's too big, but android doesn't cater to that market.
It's impossible to find a full featured smartphone smaller than 4.3"
Oh yeah, the gs3 and even the note 2 is very operable one handed
Unfortunately android offers no high end smaller sized phones.
It's a huge market untapped.
They dropped the ball with the galaxy s 3 mini, they dumbed down the specs instead of making a real galaxy s3 mini.
Honestly I think the gs3 is the perfect phone size but my wife has small hands, people like her and people who wear women's jeans say it's too big, but android doesn't cater to that market.
It's impossible to find a full featured smartphone smaller than 4.3"
Oh yeah, the gs3 and even the note 2 is very operable one handed
There's only one scenario that makes sense for Apple going forward:
- a flagship model that stays at 4" or increases slightly to 4.3" or 4.5" (yeah, developers might hate it, but it's not like they're going to abandon the Apple ecosystem).
- an 'iPhone mini' to replace the 4/4S that are currently sold to more budget-conscious buyers. It'll have the old screen size, a cheaper shell, less powerful processor and inferior cameras, but will otherwise be just like any other iPhone. It will probably also have lower storage. Essentially, it will be very similar to the older models (4/4S) that are currently available at cheaper prices.
Meanwhile, Apple can phase out the iPad 2, and the iPhone 4 and 4S, simplifying their iDevice lineup in both cases to a flagship model and a "mini" model.
- a flagship model that stays at 4" or increases slightly to 4.3" or 4.5" (yeah, developers might hate it, but it's not like they're going to abandon the Apple ecosystem).
- an 'iPhone mini' to replace the 4/4S that are currently sold to more budget-conscious buyers. It'll have the old screen size, a cheaper shell, less powerful processor and inferior cameras, but will otherwise be just like any other iPhone. It will probably also have lower storage. Essentially, it will be very similar to the older models (4/4S) that are currently available at cheaper prices.
Meanwhile, Apple can phase out the iPad 2, and the iPhone 4 and 4S, simplifying their iDevice lineup in both cases to a flagship model and a "mini" model.
Bingo low end 3G chipset and eSim, it's not a low end iPhone it's an upgraded iPod (Reach Out &) Touch.
I was going to say check out the One S, but that's also a 4.3" screen phone lol. Sorry.
Now I have a Nexus 7, I think I would actually sell my iPhone 5 for an iPhone with the same SOC, same case design and internals but a 3.5" screen. It would be even lighter and more compact then ever then Yeah the battery life would be a bit less, but then again they could give it an A6 with one of those fancy new PowerVR Series 6 GPU's!!
hmmm I shall wait to see what happens.
I dunno, I just kinda preferred the compactness of the 3.5" screen size? But the phone would have to keep the case design where you just undo the bottom screws to replace the screen, battery, home button etc..
Actually, drop LTE support, but keep 5GHZ N support, a 3.5" screen with no air gap, retina, A6 SOC and the same camera or one of those new Exmoor R sensors, and have the exact same case design as the iPhone 5 but smaller and I'll be happy.
Yeah the battery life would be a bit less, but then again they could give it an A6 with one of those fancy new PowerVR Series 6 GPU's!! hmmm I shall wait to see what happens.
I dunno, I just kinda preferred the compactness of the 3.5" screen size? But the phone would have to keep the case design where you just undo the bottom screws to replace the screen, battery, home button etc..
Actually, drop LTE support, but keep 5GHZ N support, a 3.5" screen with no air gap, retina, A6 SOC and the same camera or one of those new Exmoor R sensors, and have the exact same case design as the iPhone 5 but smaller and I'll be happy.
Last edited:
