Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

bbeagle

macrumors 68040
Oct 19, 2010
3,542
2,982
Buffalo, NY
Call it cross compatibilty and the post stays valid, going back to what thewitt actually meant. It was aimed at the whiners about that their old machines or their new software is not cross compatible. It isn't and as thewitt states, is not focus of Apple for reasons others mentioned as well.

I agree with what thewitt, you and the others stated here, but just not the examples.

Microsoft has tried to keep everything backwards-compatible, to their detriment. Old DOS programs still work with Windows 7, but that required a lot of bugs to be carried over from OS to OS, so the they would work.

Apple has always cared more about cleaning up the architecture instead of worrying that old programs work. And Apple is big on 'you used undocumented functions', or 'we fixed the bug, which we think is the right thing, even if old code needed the bug to work'.

It's much like it's a car. Microsoft will give you a new speaker system, but leave the 8-track and cassette players in there, while Apple will have removed them long ago, as they're clutter, and give you just one option to listen to music.
 

monir5

macrumors newbie
Feb 13, 2012
1
0
Secure Home

Secure Your Home is headquartered in Melbourne,Australia.
With over 10 years' experience in both the Security and Electrical industry,we believe with our knowledge and extensive range of quality products, we aim to deliver the most effective home security system to meet your needs,without the expensive price tag!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.