Now nobody can really complain about capacity -- can they?
Well, certainly not about the classic, but the whining is just getting started about the touch's capacity.
Now nobody can really complain about capacity -- can they?
Now nobody can really complain about capacity -- can they?
No way the nano is more likely to suffer since they are closer in capacity size. REAL music people will still want the classic, 160 gigs of space!I have a feeling the classic line will suffer in sales when there is the iPod touch line now
It's now called the iPod classic and is not a touch screen model.
http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2007/09/dsc_7628.jpg
I think the metal finish is a way for the iPod to stay cool since its quite larger capacity, am I right?
Not that it matters much, but with the iPod Classic, Apple has eliminated white from the iPod lineup. This almost mirrors the new iMac revision, even down to the out-of-place looking white accessories (imac --> white keys on alu keyboard + white mouse; ipod --> white earbuds.)
Not a big fan - big capacity, but who can listen to 40K songs? Who needs the whole library? Getting cross-eyed at watching video - the touch is where it is at, but the price is too high.
Personally for me a 160GB 'Pod is perfect, just what I have been waiting for
in general it's considered less glaring than the white and aluminum. But if you look at, say, how well the white accessories work on the Powerbook or the Macbook Pro, to, now, how the aluminum/white keyboard looks and how the silver iPods look, Apple is improving.
Does the iPod Classic have Cover Flow?
Dear apple.
RE: New iPods.
Meh.
Regards,
Dave.
Agreed on all points. Also, I'm not totally against white, but I'd certainly like to see Apple make a keyboard / mouse that doesn't show grime so easily.
Seriously, I had my heart set on a 160GB touchscreen model.
I don't know what to think.