Erhm, that exist in iPhones as well.
SWYPE Keyboard on iPhone ? you didn't know anything on android... NO SWYPE INPUT YET ON iOS, NUANCE DIDN'T LICENSE IT TO APPLE YET, NO SWYPE LIKE INPUT AT LEAS ON iOS7.
Sound interesting, but I don't miss any of that to be honest.
So you Dont heavy use your phone, or you like to double click home-button and then open task manager to find you previous app and jump back (3 steps on iOS, 1 step on Android with back button action).
For you it works better. But iPhones are incredible speedy already. And let's not forget, smartphones, even tough you suggest otherwise, are no serious working devices for 95% of the people out there. One is not very smart when buying a Galaxy 4 actually thinking they can do professional work on it. It's material for stand-up comedians.
I also never understood how adults can actually waste their time on debating which device is superior. In my view all smartphones are already quite powerful especially for the things they have been designed for in the first place: phoning and sending txt using e-mails or sms. They became extremely popular due of Apple's move to combine music and other possibilities with it. Apple was also the first as far I remember this correctly that rolled out video-calling build in an smartphone device. But who's first or not is not even that relevant. All smartphones are powerful and it's just a matter of taste which one you prefer.
etc.
iPhone is Fast due it dont have the task load of android (more background functions, much more pixels)...
When Jobs Launched the iPhone, the original promise was to PUT A REAL COMPUTER ON YOU POCKET, CAPABLE TO SURF THE WEB LIKE ON YOUR PC, do you remenber ? Actually that promise isn't fully accomplish yet, but the closest device to achieve full PC functionality is the Galaxy Note 2/3, while the Smaller S4 with its bigger screen approaches very close when navigating webs in "desktop mode" ...
Before iPhone there was a plenty of multimedia capable and very easy to use phones, do you remember the beloved Nokias? With powerful cameras and media players.... iPhone main novelty was the friendly OS and its web browser, deal breakers then.
You give Android not enough credits. Android has more stuff to offer where Apple's iPhone lacks in following.
like
- viruses
- vulnerable os for hackers
etc.
iPhone vulnerabilities/virus also exists (
REMEMBER THE FAKE USB CHARGER CAPABLE TO LOAD MALICIOUS APPS ON iPhones EVEN ON NON-JAILBROKEN IPHONES, but most vulnerabilities comes thru Jailbreak, as on Android is required to Root/Mod the OS to enable unsigned content -pirated apps, unofficial apps- while on Android it's an lot quirkier than on iOS is due it open ness architecture, btw however direct collaboration from the user is required (except on Android there is no reported fake-usb-charger vulnerabilities)....
Also The existence of Antivirus Apps on Google Play is due it's allowed coz google don't censor it, while such kind of apps often aren't allowed (censored by apple staff) on iOS (btw I don't think both are necessary neither effective against user collaboration).
And Android Still have something Apple Calls "fragmentation", for Android users its named (what actually is) DIVERSITY, Android has as many devices for as many user needs (we means needs as: hand sizes, visual accuracy, income, etc not only What Apple tells are my only needs (which seems for Apple User Experience dont contemplate there are a lot of different races, sizes)...
I'll watch the iPhone 5S event, mostly coz I'm interested on the Haswell Retina MacBook Pro and the Mac Pro pricing than the iPhone line, Only thing Intrigue me about iPhone 5S is the extra functionality that may have the fingerprint scanner if only used as authenticator Apple is using only 1/3 of its potential.