That's pretty much what I thought too. Well, maybe not horrific, but it does look like Windows. Same thing involving the menubar with that blue XP look. I suppose it doesn't really matter all that much though, but I don't like that it seems like everything new in Tiger resembles Windows...Stof said:I think the look of the Mail window in de screenshots is horrific! A step back in GUI design (and that is a step towards Windows...).
AdamZ said:While I got your attention. With so many of us macheads feeling left out of a cool product that even "WINDOWS" users can enjoy, sorry our 2.5 year old computer has an Airport b, is it so wrong for us diehards to be able to experience a totally cool product like Airport Express!? Just don't leave some of us folks who rode this revoluition with you behind! My original iPod still works, this 1st gen flat/panel 700 imac still runs great, we've all kept up with OS X for you, come on Apple, we have chosen you; you are OUR solutions and our future plans, figure a way to through us a bone on this one. Airport Express is too cool!!
sorry 'bout that
iGary said:You're not the only one.
GFLPraxis said:Excuse me, uh, what? Airport Express works fine with 802.11b (the old Airport), it just runs at B speeds instead of G. What's with your little rant about a nonexistant problem?
Natron said:Ok...I'm sorry...but the first thing that came to mind when seeing the image was "Windows".
beatle888 said:good point. it isnt going to be the interface that gets me to buy tiger.
mikeyrogers said:Exactly. I saw Longhorn IMMEDIATELY when I looked at that huge title bar area. But is that really a BAD thing?
johnnyjibbs said:And you'd better be able to put the mailboxes "sidebar" on the right hand side.
Some enterprising 3rd party will have a hack you can use to skin the OS, so if you hate it that much it should be fixable. I do agree with the chopping and changing theory though, Aqua used to be so standardised...johnnyjibbs said:I can just about cope with the interface inconsistencies with Panther but Tiger appears to be making a right mess of it....
----Bowie---- said:Its ok... But not grate.
Thing is, it won't replace Brushed Metal. It will be in addition to. We've now got 3 different GUIs in there, although I suspect that this is what the new Aqua is becoming. BTW, when I saw this, I thought...NO! And I still think NO!wrldwzrd89 said:When I saw this, I thought...YES! This is what Apple should have done all along. I suspect that Brushed Metal was just a temporary thing, and that both the original Aqua and Brushed Metal will be replaced by this new appearance. It'll be coded in such a way that calls to Brushed Metal/Aqua interface gadgets will simply be redirected to Platinum gadgets so that existing applications, including Apple's own, don't break.
The only problem with that is that Brushed Metal and this new appearance look too similar - one being a lighter version of the other one. I don't think Brushed Metal can survive very long if this appearance gets widely used.johnnyjibbs said:Thing is, it won't replace Brushed Metal. It will be in addition to. We've now got 3 different GUIs in there, although I suspect that this is what the new Aqua is becoming. BTW, when I saw this, I thought...NO! And I still think NO!
Natron said:Ok...I'm sorry...but the first thing that came to mind when seeing the image was "Windows".
meta-ghost said:i need/want to be able to compose mail in html dangit!