I have watched with Great interest the Apple Watch. But with version 2 I am officially confused.
With all of the work with continuity, and the ability to see all of our movies, docs, music and data across all devices, and even the ability to take a phone call on any device or transfer one activity from one device to another seamlessly across all iOS and Mac devices.... why is the Watch only capable of communication with just the iPhone?
Why can't the Watch share data with the other devices. It is not like it has to be tied to an iPhone when you are out being active now with it's built in GPS and WIFI. Here we are with a device, that stands to improve our lives in potentially any interesting ways, but it misses the goal because it does not follow in the footsteps (no pun intended) of the devices that are already part of the walled garden.
Here is the product that could literally innovate my ass, but when it comes to my MacBook it is a one trick pony and unlocks it from 8 feet away, and that is where that magic ends. It can't talk to it at all, or even share it's data directly with it or my iPad. It is a $400 dollar MacBook key?
Why is my heath data only available on an iPhone or iPod touch, but not on an iPad or MacBook. It is not available on larger devices for us to slice, dice and plan our health goals.
Why does the Apple Watch have to be tied to an iPhone? Why isn't it, and it's data, well integrated into the Apple walled garden?
I would be impressed to see this missed opportunity come to fruition on Thursday. But feel it just won't happen. The Watch is just not a particularly well rooted part of the garden.
And please before anyone yells troll. My quadra's and PPC's, would spontaneously erupt in flames in their dust laden boxes at the thought. I am just a verified gear slut, who has opted to stand on a soap box to say that I am struggling seeing more innovation around the bands than there is in getting this most recent Apple insanely great device..... to be just that.
Why does the most mobile device in the fold, have to be just an extension of the mobile device that came before it? It is that that has me so confused. It seems such a bozo move. More pigeon holing, than innovating anyone's ass.
I am going to step down from my soap box now. I am interested to hear what you have to say.
With all of the work with continuity, and the ability to see all of our movies, docs, music and data across all devices, and even the ability to take a phone call on any device or transfer one activity from one device to another seamlessly across all iOS and Mac devices.... why is the Watch only capable of communication with just the iPhone?
Why can't the Watch share data with the other devices. It is not like it has to be tied to an iPhone when you are out being active now with it's built in GPS and WIFI. Here we are with a device, that stands to improve our lives in potentially any interesting ways, but it misses the goal because it does not follow in the footsteps (no pun intended) of the devices that are already part of the walled garden.
Here is the product that could literally innovate my ass, but when it comes to my MacBook it is a one trick pony and unlocks it from 8 feet away, and that is where that magic ends. It can't talk to it at all, or even share it's data directly with it or my iPad. It is a $400 dollar MacBook key?
Why is my heath data only available on an iPhone or iPod touch, but not on an iPad or MacBook. It is not available on larger devices for us to slice, dice and plan our health goals.
Why does the Apple Watch have to be tied to an iPhone? Why isn't it, and it's data, well integrated into the Apple walled garden?
I would be impressed to see this missed opportunity come to fruition on Thursday. But feel it just won't happen. The Watch is just not a particularly well rooted part of the garden.
And please before anyone yells troll. My quadra's and PPC's, would spontaneously erupt in flames in their dust laden boxes at the thought. I am just a verified gear slut, who has opted to stand on a soap box to say that I am struggling seeing more innovation around the bands than there is in getting this most recent Apple insanely great device..... to be just that.
Why does the most mobile device in the fold, have to be just an extension of the mobile device that came before it? It is that that has me so confused. It seems such a bozo move. More pigeon holing, than innovating anyone's ass.
I am going to step down from my soap box now. I am interested to hear what you have to say.