Android is not a consistent platform. A huge chunk of that "market share" is running 1.6 and is not compatible with anything in the Market.
It would seem like that would be true, wouldn't it? But it's not.
There are a lot of apps compiled to be compatible back to 1.6 that are usable by the third world tablets you're apparently talking about. If an app doesn't need newer API features, and many apps don't, a dev's not going to limit their audience by needlessly marking it for a later version. That goes for both iOS and Android.
Of the tablets and phones made by members of the Open Handset Alliance that do have Market access built-in, 94% are on version 2.x.
Also note that when Google says there are over 350,000 Android activations each day, that's only for devices that use Google Services. Which leaves out all those ~$100 tablets you're referring to.
These comparison of a single device against a loose collection of largely incompatible devices is growing tiresome.
Not sure they're any more "incompatible" than an iPhone 4 running the latest iOS and an original iPhone running 3.x or older. At least all the Android devices support multitasking.
I made no mistakes. There is not a phone in the world that sold more then (sic) the Phone.
Which iPhone? There have been four distinct models. As for
best selling phones:
Code:
Nokia 1100 .........(250 million)
Nokia 3210 .........(150 million)
Motorola RAZR V3 ...(130 million)
Nokia 3310/3330 ... (126 million)
iPhone 4 ...........( 30 million)
iPhone 3GS......... ( 30 million)
Samsung S5230 .... ( 30 million)
Nokia 2100 .........( 20 million)
iPhone 3G ..........( 15 million)
LG Chocolate .......( 15 million)
The original iPhone is down around 25th in that list, well below the Samsung Galaxy S, Blackberry Pearl, et al.
Still and all, it's done amazingly well. Congrats to Apple.