Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

whitby

macrumors 6502
Dec 13, 2007
294
303
Austin, TX
The M1 Max is a fast powerful machine and if you can get a $4900 machine (64 GB, 4TB SSD) for $2500 it makes a lot of sense. The M3 variants are faster but are they worth paying the extra $2400 for the performance? Only you can answer. I find my M1 Max machine to more than adequate and I am not wanting for performance. The M3 Max would reduce times for some operations by maybe 25%, but is it worth cost? For the majority of the time there would be very little difference. I would go for the M1 Max machine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacPowerLvr

Acronyc

macrumors 6502a
Jan 24, 2011
905
392
M1 Max is 2 years 5 months old.
As I said in my post earlier, and if you read my original post, I was referring to the original M1. Not the M1 Max. I said this as an illustration of how people exaggerate the age of all the M series of chips.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.