Next was terrible when they introduced it, but now that they offer $25 off for not taking a subsidized phone it is a pretty good deal.
This guy gets it. It is the $25 credit when you have a 10GB data plan that wins it for the consumer. We have 2 phones on Next and unlimited talk, text and 10GBs of data. Our phones are essentially paid phone by the credits (total balance of about $11 per month for 2 phones) and we'll NEVER hit 10GB of data (we use about 4GB on average combined). We pay less than if we were on contract phones and had 4GBs of data, and we walk out of the stores having paid about $60 per phone (tax) instead of $350. We also each have the choice to upgrade anytime after 12 months in exchange for turning in our phones, or even upgrade before then if we pay off our 12 month number before then.
----------
I have two lines, one unlimited, and the other with 300mb's (my gf never, ever uses data -hippie)
Unlimited texts and a crapload of rollover minutes that never seem to end. Overages? NEVER. In anything.
$125 a month. Two lines. Both iPhone 6.
Both "activation fees" of $40 per iphone were waived, as they are every single year that I upgrade (all you have to do is call them)
Please tell me how I'm paying more than Any, ANY "Next- Mobile share"customer. In fact, if anyone can actually tell me how Next- mobile ripoff share- would benefit me so much that i'd give up my unlimited plan.
Anyone?
All depends on how much actual data you are using and if you are (or care about) having that data throttled. If you have unlimited data and are using 20GB a month and don't notice (or care) if AT&T is slowing you down at some point in your data, hey, keep that unlimited data plan. Why fix what isn't broken?
I would suggest, though, that you check the math every once in a while and see if what you actually need might be more affordable. The plans change so frequently that you might miss something good if you just assume unlimited is better.