Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,740
39,691


Despite accelerating hype surrounding the possibility of self-driving and fully autonomous vehicles in the near future, most Americans would rather drive themselves.

That's according to the results of a new study published today that aimed to assess public opinion on the subject. The survey commissioned by Kelley Blue Book showed that out of 2,264 U.S. residents polled, 64 percent said they need to be in control of their own vehicle and 62 percent said they enjoy driving.

Uber-self-driving-800x449.jpg

The results also revealed that 80 percent of participants believed people should always have the option to drive themselves, while a third of respondents said they would never buy a fully autonomous car.

When asked if they would live to see a world in which all vehicles are fully autonomous, 62 percent of respondents answered no. Baby boomers were the most resistant to the idea (72 percent), followed by Gen X (64 percent) and millennials (60 percent). Gen Z (ages 12-15) respondents were the most optimistic about a future of cars with no drivers, with only 33 percent believing such a scenario unlikely.

"This shows that while many of us have been reading a lot about progress being made on self-driving cars of late, to most people it's still like a flying car, something out of The Jetsons," said Kelley Blue Book senior analyst Karl Brauer. "But we also learned that while it's hard to get people on board, any level of exposure changes perceptions quickly."

The poll showed that most people aren't familiar with the term "autonomous vehicle" – one with no steering wheel or pedals, and no way for a human to intervene – and are wary of such technology. Meanwhile, just over half of respondents preferred to have full control of their vehicle, even if that made roads less safe overall, while 49 percent said they would be willing to cede some control to a computer if that meant having a safer roadway.

self-driving-scale-800x417.jpg

The poll results will be seen as a challenge for companies hedging their bets on an emerging market for self-driving vehicles. Ford, BMW, and Volvo aim to offer autonomous cars for sale within the next five years. Google and Uber are actively researching the area, while Lyft recently claimed that private vehicle ownership would be phased out in major cities by 2025, largely because of self-driving vehicles.

Although Apple's vehicle plans seem to be in flux, the company does have hundreds of employees working on a car project. Following Bob Mansfield's takeover of the car initiative earlier this year, Apple is said to have laid off dozens of employees as part of a "reboot" that will see focus shifting towards the development of an autonomous vehicle system.

Article Link: Public Skeptical of Self-Driving Cars Despite Race to Perfect Technology
 
Last edited:
Will be an interesting thing to watch. How do companies and governments deal with safety and at-fault legal issues. It's going to be unfortunate when the first autonomous car carrying a family plows through a guard rail and off a bridge. Who gets sued (assume this is America where everyone will be) and is it fair that the same cars elsewhere saved hundreds of lives by not letting humans make stupid mistakes. The incalculable lives saved vs the tangible firey death of another.

Either way, technology is clearly marching in this direction. I'd prefer autonomous cars with the option to take over if need to. We still give pilots ability to fly planes even with autopilot, right?

An eventual hybrid of behind the wheel responsibility will come about. Our legal system will have to update to meet the issue and society as a whole will have to become comfortable letting robots transport us and others around town.
 
The public is stupid.

I don't think most people truly realize the dangers of having millions of slow-response-time, error-prone, likely distracted, potentially intoxicated, potentially angry or upset, potentially aroused, horrible at multitasking human creatures sticking their foot on a pedal to make a several ton weapon rocket forward at 60-70 miles per hour, all just feet or even inches away from a bunch of other idiots in weapons doing the same thing, with everybody HOPING that we all stay inside of the little white lines of paint that we call lanes.

Anybody even a little open-minded and even a little knowledgable about how dangerous automobiles are when humans are at the wheel should be able to put their fears of not being in total control behind them and should be very excited for a self-driving future.
 
The thing these guys may not have realized is: I love driving my car!

The only time I'd love some automation is when I'm driving down the i75 from Canada to Florida. Then I could nap a few hours and make good time!
 
The public is stupid.

I don't think most people truly realize the dangers of having millions of slow-response-time, error-prone, likely distracted, potentially intoxicated, potentially angry or upset, potentially aroused, horrible at multitasking human creatures sticking their foot on a pedal to make a several ton weapon rocket forward at 60-70 miles per hour, all just feet or even inches away from a bunch of other idiots in weapons doing the same thing, with everybody HOPING that we all stay inside of the little white lines of paint that we call lanes.

Anybody even a little open-minded and even a little knowledgable about how dangerous automobiles are when humans are at the wheel should be able to put their fears of not being in total control behind them and should be very excited for a self-driving future.

Don't forget the "driver sacrifice problem". Human decision making, no matter how flawed, has a cachet that machine decisions do not.
 
I have always been firmly in the full autonomy camp. That's all a good programmer does - take tedious, repetitive tasks that humans don't want to do anymore, and make a computer do it instead.

My friends were all firmly in the "I'll never have an autonomous car" camp.

Then one of them, generally regarded as the safest driver of all of us, was in a near fatal accident.

They're all now in the "autonomy can't come soon enough" camp. They now realize that not being in a fatal accident doesn't require you to be perfect 99.9 repeating % of the time. It requires you to always be perfect, always, and that no human is.

These "never autonomy" people will come around. As the technology becomes more common and they have their own manual crashes, they'll come to realize that rejecting autonomous cars is like rejecting life saving medicine.
 
It will take longer for attitudes to change. Full autos won't be ready for some time. By the time the young'uns are grown up, they'll be marketable.

Biggest hurdle is still the legal rules and regulations will still take 10 years after they're ready.

The UK gov are already planning auto only motorways for lorries.
 
I enjoy driving, so I don't see why people are so interested in self driving cars.

I also see companies race to make these self driving cars, but what I see missing is the desire for a high level of safety.
 
The thing these guys may not have realized is: I love driving my car!

The only time I'd love some automation is when I'm driving down the i75 from Canada to Florida. Then I could nap a few hours and make good time!
So drive it off-road where you can risk your own life, not everyone else's :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: centauratlas
it's daunting just thinking of the human error component (humans who are driving along side the self driving cars) you know calculating the possibility of a human suddenly making adjustments ahead of you.
 
The public is stupid.

I don't think most people truly realize the dangers of having millions of slow-response-time, error-prone, likely distracted, potentially intoxicated, potentially angry or upset, potentially aroused, horrible at multitasking human creatures sticking their foot on a pedal to make a several ton weapon rocket forward at 60-70 miles per hour, all just feet or even inches away from a bunch of other idiots in weapons doing the same thing, with everybody HOPING that we all stay inside of the little white lines of paint that we call lanes.

Anybody even a little open-minded and even a little knowledgable about how dangerous automobiles are when humans are at the wheel should be able to put their fears of not being in total control behind them and should be very excited for a self-driving future.

It is not like fully self-driving car won't have accident at all.

If the car is controlled by a program, it will alway has bugs will cause accident. You will never get software without any bugs. Therefore, human take over should be an option with self-driving car.
 
it's daunting just thinking of the human error component (humans who are driving along side the self driving cars) you know calculating the possibility of a human suddenly making adjustments ahead of you.
I doubt an autonomous car would be doing that. But would have a trigger for different condition changes such as a proximity sensor trigger or light sensor. They would be more likely to keep over the recommended distance from the car in front. They might even predict a potential collision based on sound/vibrations from the ground in the event another vehicle is travelling very fast from a certain direction. If they become a public service, they might even access roadside cameras to know instantly of who's coming from where and how fast.
 
Public wary of airplanes being flown by pilots, demand that autopilots be returned to the sky.
The following generalizations may help those that are designing the autopilots for cars

People: Alert 80% of the time
Computers: Alert 100% of the time


People: Can predict what other people do, and when they're wrong, can adjust with varying degrees of skill
Computers: Can guess, and when they're wrong, and the programmer hasn't thought of a situation, the passengers are screwed


People: Care about tomorrow, and take steps to be sure they're there
Computers: Don't have the capacity to care, or know the implications of not being there


People: Get drunk, fall asleep, have fights with their spouse, kids, boss while driving
Computers: Well, we don't know what they do between clock cycles, now do we? But we assume that they just wait for the next instruction (I do have my doubts about the soberness of my work PC sometimes...)
 
I really get the feeling our grandchildren will be bewildered at the thought that everybody used to drive their own cars.

Computers and technology grow exponentially. We just don't really notice it as we're living through the curve.
 
  • Like
Reactions: _Refurbished_
I have always been firmly in the full autonomy camp. That's all a good programmer does - take tedious, repetitive tasks that humans don't want to do anymore, and make a computer do it instead.

My friends were all firmly in the "I'll never have an autonomous car" camp.

Then one of them, generally regarded as the safest driver of all of us, was in a near fatal accident.

They're all now in the "autonomy can't come soon enough" camp. They now realize that not being in a fatal accident doesn't require you to be perfect 99.9 repeating % of the time. It requires you to always be perfect, always, and that no human is.

These "never autonomy" people will come around. As the technology becomes more common and they have their own manual crashes, they'll come to realize that rejecting autonomous cars is like rejecting life saving medicine.

What's interesting is that we could have already had all of this a decade+ ago, if the observations in this article are correct: http://www.cringely.com/2016/08/25/self-driving-car-old-enough-drink-drive/

Back in 1995 the goals for self-driving cars were more modest than they are today. They weren’t called autonomous, but self-driving. And there was no plan to have cars drive themselves on city streets, just on freeways and highways — on the Interstate. The plan was to bury cables in the pavement over which all the cars would drive and communicate with each other and with the road, itself. The goal was to fill the road with cars driving at the speed limit, spaced precisely one meter apart. Ironically that simple system, which we could implement cheaply today, would achieve most of the economic and societal goals being pointed to today to support autonomous cars. We’re told they will be safer, make more efficient use of public roads, and use less energy. And it’s all true. Why, then, are we so eager to perform the much harder job of building truly autonomous cars that can pick the kids up at school? Greed again.

My own opinion is that I do like driving cars. I hate the perpetual construction my metro area is under. And that it'd be better for everyone if we just compacted our cities and built high-frequency/high-reliability monorails. The autonomous car seems like it's kind of a waste and solving today's problems, not tomorrow's.
 
Last edited:
I couldn't careless just bring the dam things, I want them for a few reason but the spiteful secret number 1 is to see the end of speed cameras and what creative means governments will use to recoup the profit lost.

The other good thing is I can see less cars on the road in big cities as companies move to monthly car rental schemes or like BMW drive now or even a Uber model. All it will really need is wireless charging so the cars can go to bays and charge themselves with no human required humans will be required to probably clean the insides, puncture repairs and servicing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: centauratlas
The 2 things that I think will slow the adoption of autonomous cars are laws/lawsuits and sensationalism from the press. Any situation where someone gets hurt in or by an autonomous car is going to bring a civil and possibly criminal trial, and the press is going to sensationalize the trial and the victim and demonize the car manufacturer.
 
There were a lot of people that said they didn't need an iPhone because "I just make phone calls". Now, those same people, don't even communicate via phone, but rather, text.

The public's perception of new technology is usually skewed and quickly changes once there is a tangible connection to the shift in technology. Once people realize the incredible advances to our society that self-driving vehicles will bring, those perceptions will change.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.