You confuse hard number facts for opinions in the review I am referencing. They gave the 6S a Gold review based on opinions, not facts. Which shows a personal bias on their part.
Not different than for example, car and driver giving the car of the year award based on opinion combined with factual data. Or Zagat giving out the stars. I suppose every review piece across the globe exhibits a bias then.
How exactly can a review write an opinion on something which pleases everybody and can't be considered biased by some?
They didn't write a review of a product. They gave the 6S a Gold star rating based on opinions, not facts.
It's my perception of you from reading many of your posts. Owning or claiming to own an iPhone means nothing on MR. We have people who own them and spend much of their time writing about how crap it is, bizarrely. I just don't know what to believe, nor do I understand it.
You've never given an opinion as to what phone to buy in any thread, ever? Somebody could base a buying decision on your (potentially biased) opinion. I'm not going to run out and buy another iphone 6S because anandtech gave it a gold review. 13 million bought the 6s launch day weekend before the review. Every review has some bias, I still can see where they have more or less bias than any other review who makes a "recommendation". In the day it was said Car and Driver was a subsidiary of BMW for example.
Click-bait as all companies "manipulate" the press. Enron? Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC ? There's a certain naivety if there's the thought apple is only one that wants to use the press to their own advantage. Having said that Anandtech has quite a following even though I am only on the site occasionally. That they write reviews and award silver, bronze and gold doesn't make them unique and that the sites veracity is questioned in online forums doesn't make them unique either.
Seems like some people are trying to connect dots that aren't meant to be connected.
