Given the price slashing it doesn't seem the Air was all that popular to begin with.They did build the Adamo to compete with the Macbook Air, did that force Apple to compete?
Last chance like the Cube?
Given the price slashing it doesn't seem the Air was all that popular to begin with.They did build the Adamo to compete with the Macbook Air, did that force Apple to compete?
Given the price slashing it doesn't seem the Air was all that popular to begin with.
Last chance like the Cube?
$100 here or there is standard fare for Apple. Make previous BTO features standard and slide some processors down as they become cheaper to provide such an illusion.They also slashed the price of all their computers, I guess those weren't that popular either.
If the Air is not popular, I wonder how well the Adamo is selling, have you seen the prices on the.
The development effort is one of the first experiments by a big-name PC maker in a nascent category of products known as mobile Internet devices, or MIDs,which are designed to fill a perceived gap between mobile phones and laptop computers.
I hope they release this as maybe it will get Apple off their collective rear-ends and make something like a tablet and netbook - but this Apple we are talking about, right?
yea i agree, more competition = better finished products for consumers!
Why do people keep thinking apple's strategy is dictated by what everyone else does? Apple does what they think is best, and others adapt to them - not the other way around.
Just look at the much clamored for "headless imac" - half of MR thinks apple is stupid for leaving this "hole in their product line up" and letting other computer makers take all that potential business. Maybe that's right and maybe it's not (IMO, $29b in the bank says apple execs knows more about engineering/marketing/sales than the average MR poster, but what do I know), but the fact that dell offers headless towers hasn't, and won't, force apple to do the same. Likewise, this product will not push apple in to doing anything they weren't going to do anyway.
That aside, this will flop. Dell should stick to what they're good at - selling fairly high-quality generic computers at good prices. That's a profitable strategy, and they execute it fairly well. But let's not pretend they know how to innovate.
The way most of you are talking you'd think that Apple invented touch screen media players.
The way most of you are talking you'd think that Apple invented touch screen media players.
I hope they release this as maybe it will get Apple off their collective rear-ends and make something like a tablet and netbook - but this Apple we are talking about, right?
well i hope that they try to make a device to compete with the ipod touch. hopefully it'll force apple to make a bigger one
dell is a strange company, they seem to be fantastic at nothing but above average at most things, their computers are fine, their PDAs were fine, and i assume if they make a phone it'll be nothing special but better than average
Probably going to be discontinued in about a year or two, they should stick to making commodity computers.
To little to late! -- This will be a yawner of a device. By the time this thing comes out Apple will be finishing up the next round of software and hardware updates for the iPhone. I am not sure how they will compete but I guess time will tell.
This site really has just become an iPhone glory hole... Page 2, if at all.
Following on the success of the Dell "iPod killer", the Dell DJ, they ought to keep that theme going for their handheld computer and call it the Dell HJ for Hand Job.
For some people, that is all that matters. Not to me though.I can't imagine what Dell could bring to the table except a low initial price tag.
Just what the world needs: another cheap junky phone made by the leaders in cheap and junky. Dell is like so many other companies. They wait for the innovator to take the risks and then they try to fight over scraps discarded by that innovator. I can't imagine what Dell could bring to the table except a low initial price tag.