Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

maflynn

macrumors Broadwell
Original poster
May 3, 2009
75,333
45,820
This is surprising, though I don't know what it means for us in the long run
EA confirms it will go private in $55 billion acquisition
Beleaguered video game giant Electronic Arts has agreed to a $55 billion acquisition that will take the company private. Saudi Arabia Public Investment Fund (PIF), Silver Lake and Affinity Partners have reached a deal to buy EA, the company said in a statement.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Huntn
This is surprising, though I don't know what it means for us in the long run
EA confirms it will go private in $55 billion acquisition
So they just get rid of their stockholders, but are there still masters? I assume so. I agree that it remains to be seen what this means. The game industry seems to be in disarray with a few healthy players, and many not so healthy with third party corporate masters pulling the strings. That's just a vague, general observation... ;)
 
Here's some more details, and its more disconcerting
Video gamer Electronic Arts to be bought in largest-ever private equity buyout valued at $55 billion

EA stockholders will receive $210 per share. The deal far exceeds the $32 billion price tag to take Texas utility TXU private in 2007, which had shattered records for leveraged buyouts.

So shareholders will get 210 per share, but it seems this deal is going to be a leveraged buyout. Few companies ever excel, or do well when they are saddled with billions of dollars of debt. They didn't buy them because EA had good long term prospects to make profits, they're going to gut the company and leave the husk floundering in debt, all in the name of making money
 
The ars article confirms that EA now has 20 billion dollars of debt

One of the biggest differences between a publicly owned EA and a privately owned version is that the latter will be saddled with roughly $20 billion of fresh debt provided by JP MorganChase, which is being used to help finance the leveraged buyout. Wedbush Morgan analyst Michael Pachter estimates the firm will be on the hook for roughly $1 billion a year in service payments on that debt after the deal closes.

So if this article is accurate, the company has to pay 1 billion dollars a year to JP Morgan. So just to put that in perspective, in FY25 (march 31st) EA had a net profit of 1.121 billion. Basically now with this debt nearly all of their profit will be wiped out.
 
  • Sad
  • Like
Reactions: Queen6 and Huntn
The ars article confirms that EA now has 20 billion dollars of debt



So if this article is accurate, the company has to pay 1 billion dollars a year to JP Morgan. So just to put that in perspective, in FY25 (march 31st) EA had a net profit of 1.121 billion. Basically now with this debt nearly all of their profit will be wiped out.
$1B a year, small change for a mega-Corp. 🤔
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Queen6
My guess is that the transaction could lead to an EA renaissance because it is not the usual type of private equity buyout.

The lead investor is a sovereign wealth fund, owned by a country whose de facto leader wants to reduce its dependence on oil exports, use entertainment assets—such as sports and video gaming—to better its international image, and bring in jobs that are attractive to the country's younger population. In addition, the EA purchase is an addition to an existing portfolio of video game companies.

Given the objectives of the country, which are all long-term in nature as opposed to the typical private equity time frame of five years or less, and the large amounts of money available to the fund, I think there is a chance EA will not be stripped of everything of value and run in a way that is only meant to extract cash. This isn't a certainty, of course, but let's face it...EA hasn't been operating with its customers' interests in mind for decades now. Barely finished games, excessive micro-transactions, awful writing, the list goes on and on and on. Things can't get much worse from a gamer's perspective.
 
Am indifferent to the likes of EA, they have abused their position for years on end. If EA improves👍Should EA fail👍Others will fill the void and hopefully learn that poisoning the well is a very bad idea... TBH same applies to all these money grabbing corporations, just don't care equally I vote with my wallet as are many more these days.

Most I think are waking up to companies churning out time limited garbage, in the case of games broken garbage, ever changing TOS and are looking for better solutions from companies that actually value their customers not solely the shareholders & executive's bonuses.

Q-6
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.