I've found the order page courtesy of the Wayback Machine. I was mistaken about there being a dual 1.42 GHz option; I remembered that there were two "custom" configs available and I guess I assumed that the other one was 1.42.
I've found the order page courtesy of the Wayback Machine. I was mistaken about there being a dual 1.42 GHz option; I remembered that there were two "custom" configs available and I guess I assumed that the other one was 1.42.
Lets look at a quote from that site..."It was released on June 23, 2003 along with the original Power Macintosh G5 models and discontinued on June 9, 2004 when the Power Macintosh G5 (June 2004) series was introduced."If we are to assume this site is accurate in it's information, then Apple didn't sell a single Mac OS 9 bootable PowerMac from January 28, 2003 until June 23, 2003.
Not only does this differ from what Apple says... far more importantly, it differs from the history of what happened.
Further, I surely don't recall Apple providing processor options... if you wanted options, you bought the current (Mac OS X only) PowerMac G4s, if you wanted Mac OS 9, you got what Apple was willing to make available. Apple specifically didn't want these systems to directly compete with the current line up. Mac OS 9 was dead and they weren't going to go too much out of their way with these systems.
Drive options and memory options... those aren't hard to believe (and don't really effect production), video card options is stretching it a bit (and the GeForce4 would be a down-grade) and processor options (specially a dual 1.42 GHz option) was fully outside of what Apple was willing to do back then.
Correct me if I am wrong here, but aren't you saying that you have a PowerMac G4 MDD with a single processor at 1.25 GHz that can boot Mac OS 9... and isn't that exactly what I said Apple was selling?
If you had a Dual G4 1.42 that booted Mac OS 9... I'd be eating my words (happily). And I could have missed the specs for the PowerMac G4 MMD (June 2003) when looking for PowerMac specs, so pointing out that one (which has both processor and video card options) would be a good way to prove your point.
But for the sake of keeping people from performing wild goose chases, lets stick with what can be pretty firmly established (by Apple no less).
I stand corrected then.I've found the order page courtesy of the Wayback Machine. I was mistaken about there being a dual 1.42 GHz option; I remembered that there were two "custom" configs available and I guess I assumed that the other one was 1.42.