Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

DJJAZZYJET

macrumors 6502
Jun 4, 2011
459
144
$1,300

Tim Cook Responds

Apple-CEO-Calls-Greenlight-Suit-A-Silly-Side-Show-2.jpg

timcooklaughing.jpg

Has me laughing in exactly the same manner
 

Giuly

macrumors 68040
Okay, first off, explain to me exactly what you're talking about here. Webpages? They upscale on the retina enabled devices, and could just as easily downscale for lower resolution devices.

It's not a big deal. All that stuff is determined by whoever is designing the webpage.

I'm talking about the point that avatars are defined it this forum as 75x75px, and for them to be 'retina enabled', you need to fit 150x150px in there because a retina Mac sees that as 75x75 points with 4 pixel per point.
Code:
<img src="Some150x150pxImage.png" style="width:75px; height:75px;" alt="This is retina!" />
Is the solution, and yes, it would downscale the image on lower-resolution screens. If it's up to me, you could also use some JavaScript magic to determine the point size and load @2x images as appropriate. But I was initially talking about text, which is obviously vectorized and hence always retina optimized, even though I didn't explicitly point that out.

The question was how exactly you would do that with a MacRumors avatar.
 
Last edited:

yanksrock100

macrumors 6502a
Oct 30, 2010
673
245
San Diego
Wow, what a horrible move! Even the Google lovers are questioning this...its a $1300 web browser! My Macbook Air is $1199, and can do 20x the things this can...iOS programming, photoshop, Final Cut, ect. Not to mention it has 128 gb of storage, which looks massive vs 32! If I wanted that great screen, I would gladly go for the rMBP for $1499...

But wait! For $1449 you can get 64 gigs of storage! wtf?

I am baffled, this is so stupid...
 

gorskiegangsta

macrumors 65816
Mar 13, 2011
1,281
87
Brooklyn, NY
I would have thought it would be aimed at the retina MacBook Pro.

With a mere 32GB of storage and zero professional software available??

I don't think any "professional" in their right mind would consider this over a rMBP. Even MBA has an ability to run Photoshop in 64bit with no problem, and it has 4x SSD storage for the same price. Yes, the Pixel's resolution is better, but if you're a "professional", the likelihood is you already have calibrated, external 2560x1600 ~30" monitor.
 

Nahaz

macrumors 6502
Jun 2, 2010
311
35
Australia
And now you see why Apple has a 128GB iPad

Why would you even bother with the Chrome Pixel. It's just a Tablet with a keyboard at best, with limited software or apps.

Apple has this covered.
 

drewface

macrumors member
Jul 24, 2009
62
0
They charge you $50/month for cloud storage after three years. That means you can pay $1300 for this worthless piece of junk, then after 3 years, Google expects you to add $600/year on top of that. If you don't want to pay that $600, then you won't be able to access your data.
 

HighDesert50

macrumors regular
Jan 23, 2011
104
67
I suspect Google is anticipating a rigorous development of software apps. They already have the infrastructure for app development. They are baiting the developers with this machine. If you build it, they will come.
 

likemyorbs

macrumors 68000
Jul 20, 2008
1,956
5
NJ
Buy an iPad, and a Logitech Ultrathin keyboard cover. You will pay half the price and have a superior product with a screen that's not even much smaller. Not only that, the iPad also separates from the keyboard, unlike the chromebook.

Edit: Oh yeah, and it's ugly too.
 

deconstruct60

macrumors G5
Mar 10, 2009
12,309
3,900
Only way this isn't stupid is if they have some secret Chrome OS revolution they're about to unleash on the world that will change everything.

There is nothing secret... the core premise is HTML 5 (pragmatically Javascript + expanded HTML capabilities ). More apps are going to be written that run in the browser. Microsoft has them (web version of Office) , Google has more than a few, etc.

Apple positioned HTML 5 to be a "flash killer". If so then Chrome OS is set to fully leverage that as a new viable application platform.
 

stevemiller

macrumors 68000
Oct 27, 2008
1,984
1,495
as many have already pointed out, this doesn't compete with the macbook air; it competes with the ipad. and loses.
 

MagnusVonMagnum

macrumors 603
Jun 18, 2007
5,193
1,442
The amount of sneer, ignorance, and sheer google () hatred on the first few pages of this thread is staggering. It's also highly embarrassing to the posters and upvoters, and highly ironic.

Google is a good search engine. That's about it as far as I'm concerned. I'm still wondering if they're reading all my freaking emails (seems they've allowed themselves to for commercial interests sake and mining your personal conversations for ad-targeting) and then there's Google Plus.... It's Google's attempt to destroy the Fourth Amendment for money's sake.

They used to be cool...until they went corporate. Now they're PURE EVIL and worse than both Apple AND Microsoft, IMO. They think nothing of your Fourth Amendments rights and want to force your real identity upon the world just to rate a freaking restaurant or use their video chat program. Frak'em.

While google is doing what apple was ONCE famous for

Ignoring customer wishes and invading your privacy? :cool:

releasing a device ahead of it's time, taking risks, going with something disruptive they get one moronic comment after the other from posters here.

Sadly, yours is the only such comment I'm seeing. Google's "web only" OS is freaking bloatware, pointless crapola that spies on EVERYTHING you do and SELLS IT. But you're OKAY with that. You buy one. I have no interest in letting people make money off my identity at every key press.

Elongated the iphone, yet stuck a denting aluminum frame to it.

You must drop your phone a lot.... :rolleyes:

Came up with their worse os after lion, mountain lion, a sad excuse of an os update with twitter, facebook, reminders and notes.

Mountain Lion surprised me how good it is. I finally upgraded my 2008 Macbook Pro to it recently after using it on my new Mac Mini Server. Frankly, your comments just keep looking worse and worse and WORSE....

Came up with ios 6.0, the crappiest update to ios ever, with the maps fiasco, no widgets, no ability to run two apps side by side, nothing of real value to the table.

Other than the maps fiasco (I can't really use them much on my iPod Touch most of the time), these other things you list weren't on the previous iOS version either so how does that make it the worst iOS release ever??? I like display mirroring (pretty sweet when playing games so others can watch on an AppleTV, etc.)

Messed up the interface of the apple tv.

How touching that your sense of style figures into your argument. I really don't have any trouble getting around in it. Neither interface was "great", though.


Everyone here trying to rip google apart, do you think you can take your heads out of your macs and realize what apple has actually been doing the past year or so?

That still doesn't make Google's OS anything less than a freaking JOKE. Rag on OSX and iOS all you want. They're still 100x better than a web-based OS. You'll need the i5 CPU power just to make a basic calculator app run. :rolleyes:
 

Renzatic

Suspended
Agreed. Touchscreens aren't viable yet as the ONLY input device for day-to-day computing. The Surface is a great example of this, try to use the Surface without the Touch Cover or Type Cover and you quickly get frustrated, especially if you're trying to use Microsoft Office.

I don't think touch will ever become the exclusive means to work with your computer. Much like anything, it works in some situations better than others. Sometimes you need a keyboard, a mouse, or a stylus to work best with what you're doing.

And the keyboards? Honestly, I think I'd use my Apple bluetooth over any of the touch covers if I got a Surface. I think the Type cover could be pretty decent, but from all the years I've used my desktop, and my recent experiences with my iPad, I've come to prefer having a completely detached keyboard to work with. Like I could pop the surface on a table, and use the keyboard in my lap if I wanted to, or I could caddy corner it off to the side with the keyboard right in front of me. I like the freedom of movement it gives me.

But as an additional input method, to augment the trackpad and mouse, it's actually really intuitive. I was skeptical too until I tried it. Now I'm very, very close to buying a Lenovo Yoga. But the more research I do, the more I realize how much a digitizer and stylus could be handy too. Now I'm seriously exploring the "pull apart" tablet/laptop combinations that offer stylus support, like the upcoming Thinkpad Helix.

The one reason I don't like the pull apart machines is because I know...I KNOW...I'll pick it up by the screen one day and end up dropping the bottom half onto the floor and break it into a billion pieces. That one huge caveat aside, I do like what they offer. I think they're better best-of-both-worlds devices than the Surface currently is.

...though I'm coming around to think I'll eventually end up liking the Surface more once MS eeks some extra battery life and shaves a tiny bit more weight off it. Even as a desktop machine, it being just a screen means I can be a little more freeform with how I lay it out. It's kinda like an itty bitty iMac in a way.
 

likemyorbs

macrumors 68000
Jul 20, 2008
1,956
5
NJ
But I want to be able to run apps without an internet connection. Web apps don't make sense. I want native apps that upload to the cloud automatically in addition to saving locally. I want the best of both worlds, which is what the iPad currently gives me.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.