I assume, then, that you don't sign in to Apple on any iDevice or Mac, right? No iCloud, no email, etc?Yes.
"Sign in" to Google?Not Happenin'.No matter what they offer me.
I assume, then, that you don't sign in to Apple on any iDevice or Mac, right? No iCloud, no email, etc?Yes.
"Sign in" to Google?Not Happenin'.No matter what they offer me.
How could it be possible for Android to have THAT many more phones in the wild, yet iOS users are the ones that create most of the traffic?
Nope, it's more like Google Spy. As in, we'll suck all the information out of your phone and your accounts and pop up ads, uhm I mean recommendations , as you walk down the block. Google Now is spyware.
Purely from ad revenue, agreed. But don't forget Google Play, which makes the bulk of its money off Android devices.Imho, it would probably be more profitable for Google to release their apps on iOS FIRST.
Purely from ad revenue, agreed. But don't forget Google Play, which makes the bulk of its money off Android devices.
I can't foresee a day where I'll stop preferring OS X (or it's successors),
And you have to remember that Google is hurting the relationship they had with Apple with Android - removal of included YouTube- and Google-based mapping apps was most likely a part of the thermonuclear war, Steve talked about.
I foresee Apple dropping OSX completely within the next 5 years. It generates less and less revenue every single passing day.
If so, then Apple is truing to win a nuclear war by using a pea shooter. No wonder they are making zero progress.
I'm not sure about that. Once iOS folks start to see what sorts of capabilities Android phones have, they likely will continue to switch to Android - maybe even faster than they are already switching to Android.
that's just wishful thinking
Yeah, that guy's argument makes no sense. Apple spited Google by removing the default apps, only to turn around and let Google offer even better ones through the app store for everyone to get. Makes. Total. Sense.
Agreed, but I see that changing significantly in the near future. More higher-end Android - and in particular, Google - phones are being sold to people who are as affluent as iPhone buyers, and those consumers are just as willing to buy content as their iPhone-using equivalents.I doubt that Google is making a lot from their Google Play appstore.
But Apple won't hand YOUR soul to Google.
It's kinda like an opt-in model, which should also remind you of the time Apple enraged all the world's publishers by not handing them the personal information of each user who subscribed to their newspaper on the iPad, but instead created an opt-in model, the app asking the people if they would like to share their adress with the publisher.
Fair enough, I'm man enough to admit when I was wrong.
But I don't get this at all. I have both an iPhone and Galaxy S3 and I'm easily 10 times more likely to surf, shop, and buy using my S3 than I am my iPhone. The larger screen alone is all the reason I need.
Something about this just doesn't seem right. I'm not doubting the numbers, but it feels like something is skewing the results they're presenting. How could it be possible for Android to have THAT many more phones in the wild, yet iOS users are the ones that create most of the traffic?
Right. Apple would much rather have that information for themselves. Don't make them out to be the good guys in the fight for your privacy here. They're almost as bad as Google is when it comes to tracking what you do through their services.
Well, my opinion is that the typical Android user is not who you'd think it would be. It's not a sophisticated user, but a value seeking user. "I need a smartphone, but I don't need a fancy one, just something cheap." That person I bet is the overwhelming majority, and the smart guys who are the most vocal "fanDroids" are like the Twitter version of the real story. Case-in-point, most Android phones are still using old versions of Android. People don't care/don't know how to update. They just want a phone that can technically do all those cool things smartphones can do, but they don't do much more than text, email and phone calls, and a few games.
True, but Im pretty sure bots don't read your emails from me.com/icloud.com, and when you delete your email, it's really deleted and not kept forever in a database. I could be wrong, but gmail is proven that they do this and I've never heard anyone claim that Apple did this.
Fair enough, I'm man enough to admit when I was wrong.
But I don't get this at all. I have both an iPhone and Galaxy S3 and I'm easily 10 times more likely to surf, shop, and buy using my S3 than I am my iPhone. The larger screen alone is all the reason I need.
Something about this just doesn't seem right. I'm not doubting the numbers, but it feels like something is skewing the results they're presenting. How could it be possible for Android to have THAT many more phones in the wild, yet iOS users are the ones that create most of the traffic?
Good points. I also have the GS3. I probably dont use it like most though. I dont game much..or even use it as a phone. Man I hate talking on the phone. Id rather just text. I know anti-social. I guess I just like to tweak and flash custom ROM's to try out. To me its kind of a "toy".
But there are 2 ipads in the house (not mine) and I have a galaxy tab. But any surfing browsing i just use my phone.
Ok, Siri is probably better at letting you listen to music, but that's not the primary purpose of Google Now, is it?
ftfy