It's all business I understand, Apple's gotta have its 40% hardware margins to make the street happy.
Actually, it's to keep investors happy. We buy upgrades of the iPads every year to keep the investors happy.
Last edited:
It's all business I understand, Apple's gotta have its 40% hardware margins to make the street happy.
With Americans still recovering from the economic recession, and many still unemployed, one might expect Apple to keep the price point of iPad Minis at $329 or lower. But profits and greed still dictate over innovation. Very few will buy an Apple Mini for $399. Eventually, Apple will be forced to lower the price of the Mini, especially in this market with so many alternatives to the iPad. And, yes, this is from someone who owns an phone, ipad, imac, and macbook air.
I was bummed out about the no touch ID thing, but have to admit the mini retina looks pretty darn good. Shaving .9 pounds off the current ipad is impressive as hell. I eagerly await the Pro version if there is one.
if you're out of a job or having major money issues why should you be buying an iPad in the first place??
No touch id, $399 price tag makes me unimpressed. I will wait till the next version.
I have job. I can buy the new iPad mini. The point is why should anyone buy the new iPad Mini at $399 when they can buy the the older version for $299 or the iPad Air for $499. The price point does not make any sense.
With Americans still recovering from the economic recession, and many still unemployed, one might expect Apple to keep the price point of iPad Minis at $329 or lower. But profits and greed still dictate over innovation. Very few will buy an Apple Mini for $399. Eventually, Apple will be forced to lower the price of the Mini, especially in this market with so many alternatives to the iPad. And, yes, this is from someone who owns an phone, ipad, imac, and macbook air.
By all logic a retina iPad mini was really supposed to be another generation away. All expectations pointed to an A6 chip and a non-retina display being the most likely move for this generation. With that, I'm sure the price point could have stayed consistent and would still have sold millions of units.
Instead of going the safe and easy route ( and likely more profit margin friendly) Apple responded to their customers' desire for a better display and gave them one. They also skipped a processor generation to do it, which in turn put the mini on par with the full size model in terms of performance. These components all cost money, which affects the price.
Would you prefer the $329 price point or a better product? Both is not an option unless you live in a fantasy land where money grows on trees and everyone is entitled to whatever they want for free.
I was actually pleasantly surprised about this. In fact, I wouldn't have been completely surprised if the Mini became more expensive than the regular iPad. I mean, doesn't squeezing the exact same specs into a smaller device make the device more costly to manufacture? I always figured that's why the iPhone is $650.
In fact, why would people complain about how the Mini is more expensive now, and yet not say a word against the iPhone which is a much smaller device yet costs $650? If smaller screen size should entitle a lower price, why be upset about the Mini but okay with the iPhone?
I am not complaining. Just stating the obvious. Buyers will either gravitate towards the Mini at $299 or the iPad Air at $499.
If the lack of touch ID is due to supply constraints then they should've delayed it till December. Why promote the feature one month ago, then make no mention of it today.
I am not complaining. Just stating the obvious. Buyers will either gravitate towards the Mini at $299 or the iPad Air at $499.
With Americans still recovering from the economic recession, and many still unemployed, one might expect -
Apple to keep the price point of iPad Minis at $329 or lower. But profits and greed still dictate over innovation. Very few will buy an Apple Mini for $399.
Eventually, Apple will be forced to lower the price of the Mini, especially in this market with so many alternatives to the iPad. And, yes, this is from someone who owns an phone, ipad, imac, and macbook air.
As I said, I own a number of Apple products, but that does not mean I have to agree with their marketing strategy. A recent article illustrates my point.
http://www.businessinsider.com/apples-ipad-sales-weaker-than-expected-2013-7
"The larger problem, arguably, is that Apple is trying to maintain premium pricing in a market in which competitors are increasingly selling high-quality iPad alternatives for significantly lower prices."
I am not complaining. Just stating the obvious. Buyers will either gravitate towards the Mini at $299 or the iPad Air at $499.
As I said, I own a number of Apple products, but that does not mean I have to agree with their marketing strategy. A recent article illustrates my point.
http://www.businessinsider.com/apples-ipad-sales-weaker-than-expected-2013-7
"The larger problem, arguably, is that Apple is trying to maintain premium pricing in a market in which competitors are increasingly selling high-quality iPad alternatives for significantly lower prices."
No touch id, $399 price tag makes me unimpressed. I will wait till the next version.
If the lack of touch ID is due to supply constraints then they should've delayed it till December. Why promote the feature one month ago, then make no mention of it today. We all know they will include it next year for probably the same price. And that's when everyone who bites this year will not have future proofed their device for when touch ID gains more usability other than unlocking and app purchasing.
A little surprised of Apple's caliber not to have planned this months ago in order to offer touch ID across all the top of the line iOS products.
This makes zero sense, a $399 Retina Mini is too expensive but an exact same spec Ipad Air for 499 isn't too expensive. Massive logic fail.
----------
None of the competitors come close to the Ipad in terms of specs.
The recession hasn't ended and of anything its worse then it was when it started in late 2008.