Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

kylepro88

macrumors regular
Jul 30, 2006
247
102
Nashville
I know this thread is for iMac benchmarks but for those that want to compare the above posters maxed out 2012 iMac, here were my results.

2:58 seconds
80.97 fps

That's on a 2009 Mac Pro, 2.93Ghz, 26GB RAM, ATI 5870 with normal 7200rpm HD's inside.

We're only talking a 14.2% difference between my "Pro" machine and the above posters maxed out iMac.

Sorta answers my question regarding dumping this MP or not. I think I'll keep it since it looks like the machines are almost identical. Next generation will probably match up to this machine though or possibly surpass. Time will tell...
 

Fangio

macrumors 6502
Jan 25, 2011
375
473
10717
2009 Mac Pro, the one in my sig: 2.93 8core, 16GB RAM, Samsung 830 256GB boot drive, Handbrake 0.9.6 x86_64

[18:00:00] macgui: Rip: Pending queue count is 0
[18:03:01] work: average encoding speed for job is 79.467323 fps

Encode time: 3:01
 

jmpage2

macrumors 68040
Sep 14, 2007
3,236
594
Late 2012 i7 iMac, 1TB Fusion drive, 24GB RAM


[09:10:46] work: average encoding speed for job is 68.579437 fps


Not sure how to figure out the encode time, it ran a little over three minutes.
 

ssdaytona

macrumors regular
Apr 20, 2011
136
24
so, I replacing a 2011 27" i5 2.7Ghz machine with either the 2012 27" i5 2.9GHz or i7 3.4GHz

Someone posted the 2012 i7 3.4GHz results, but can someone post the 2012 i5 2.9Ghz results?

2012 27" i5 2.9GHz = ???
2012 27" i7 3.4GHz = 3:35 minutes
2011 27" i7 3.4 GHz = 3:48 minutes
2011 27" i5 2.7GHz = 5:48 minutes
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.