Originally posted by jwthomp
This is not true. The album price is at a reduced rate. It appears that almost all albums are $9.99. Far far cheaper than the cost of most albums in the store.
Not quite true. you need to take this on a case-by-case basis. For instance, Norah Jone's excellent album is just as expensive online as at Best Buy ($13.86). It has 14 tracks, so album price here is == track-by-track price. I don't know why, but Pink's album is marked as "By Song Only" ... you can buy every track, but there is no album price.
I haven't found a "majority" of disks at a discounted rate. It seems more are grouped around $.99*#tracks, and then a select group discounted below that.
Seems to me we're hitting the vagueries of each label's contract with Apple. Perhaps some allowed discounting of some of their artists' full albums while others licensed only per-song or album-same-as-sum-of-tracks pricing.
The .99 price becomes an excellent deal when you only wish to purchase one or two songs from an album.
Exactly. That's where Apple gets my money: when I can preview all the tracks of an album and fairly confidently say "not for me" on all but a handful. For full albums, I can get the same tracks along with a physical CD and jewel case
and liner notes (sorry, I'm shocked that "cover art" is all Apple's providing here!) for nothing more than a periodic stop in to the Best Buy on my ride home from work.
The album strategy, IMHO, needs work before this goes full-access (Windows+International). Either you compete on price (which Apple has never done very well) or you compete on features (give us access to music videos and extra content that wouldn't fit on a CD along with 70 minutes of music for our money!) Fewer features for equivalent cost leaves only convenience, and frankly the convenience just isn't all that significant when every street corner has a music store!
One problem that can arise is if you purchase one or two songs from and album and later decide to purchase the whole thing, you don't get credit towards your purchase. So in effect you own "two" copies of some songs. I also imagine that the digital rights mechanisms do not handle this (say putting it on 6 macs).
Correct. Your "2" copies of the songs are still only available to three Macs, as each is branded with your AppleID and only three Macs can be authorized on a single AppleID at once.
One thing that puzzles me is the Rendezvous support. If anyone wants to listen to my music via iTunes Rendezvous support, they must have my user name and password for my .Mac account to authorize them, and this counts as one share.
Really? Are you sure? My impression was that iTunes streaming allows your computer to "authorize" any number of clients. As Mr Jobs said in the demo, you have access to your friends' shared playlists while they are in the area, and when they leave, they take their sons with them (he said it better though
)
I think we need someone to experiment with this...
I am in a work environment where we are all on Mac's and this basically negates using Rendezvous for sharing music. I can't even pick one or two people to let use my music as I own two other Macs (an iMac and an iBook) that I use regularly and want to be able to listen to the music on those systems. For me this is the biggest drawback so far.
Well, the Rendezvous support using MP3 or non-branded AAC (ie, self-ripped in iTunes) works great in a work setting. We had a handful of shared playlists floating around here about ten minutes after Job's announcement.