Emrtr4 said:
None of you are getting the point.
A LOW END DELL today, one for $800 ships with 7300s.
Anyone could buy a PC from a number of builders under $2K that has multiple 7600 GPUs.
For the price, users are still getting ripped off because of the GPU.
The only way a Mac user could hook up multiple monitors to the Macpro would be to purchase the 7300. But if you do VIDEO editing that may not be enough graphical power. So why is apple putting low end cards in a high end system?
A 7600 would add almost NOTHING to the price. None of you seem to understand that a single Macbookpro X1600 is FASTER than all of the 7300s.
If you believe that paying $2500 and getting a 7300 is FAIR and "well priced" then you are a simple blind fanboy.
ALSo, to respond to the idiot who said that it has things like "multiple hardrives" and ECC ram. Guess what, $1100 for 4 gigs of LOW END ECC 667 RAM IS about $900 too much.
$500 on NEwegg will get you 4 gigs of 1066 ECC OZC or Crucial RAM with heatspreader technology and DDR2 which is many times faster than that memory.
1) Xeon chips are more expensive than Core 2 Duo desktop chips
2) Photoshop and Final Cut Pro don't require a $500+ graphics card to function at its fullest.
3) There are more 2D graphics designers than 3D
4) Serious 3D designers use dedicated 3D rendering cards
5) People who are serious about their professions opt to upgrade to the correct hardware
6) No one is forcing you to buy Apple RAM
7) Faster ram on a motherboard that cannot support it will cut ram speed back down to what it can take.
8) $1100 - $900 != $500
9) GPU power != overall system usability
10) The Macpro design is all about expandability.
Can someone please explain Apple's reasoning for me?
We already did. So people can attach many monitors for extra workspace. Accept it.
I would recommend that if you want to save money and have a gaming rig, go Windows/PC. Buying Mac you do pay premiums for convinence and Mac-pretty cases.