This has been my observation as well, although I only have the iPad mini and the Fire HD.I checked out the Mini today...
The fuzziness vs the awkward character proportions comes down to differences in text rendering on the two platforms and not really differences in the screen so much.
Yes. I would say that because of the wider screen, actually, I am enjoying reading and browsing more. Then again, I tend to zoom web pages in to the largest size that fits the whole column of text, so what that means is that I can display the same content on the iPad mini that I can on the Kindle, only the iPad's letters are about 20% larger, which basically makes up for the 25% pixel density difference.Their 216 PPI isn't really enough, and when viewing web pages at their "native" size, the Kindle and Nexus displays are probably about what a Mini would look like if it had 180-190 PPI or thereabouts, IOW something between 163 and 216, IOW, not as huge a leap as marketeers would want you to believe.
That's not really the case, though. The problem is that websites designed for desktops and laptops just don't look good at native size on a smartphone or small tablet--that's why the original iPad was 10" to begin with.Thank you for that comparison. It's very helpful. It's disappointing though that as a reading and web browsing device the Mini is not great. Those uses would be my primary purpose for such a portable tablet.
You need a big jump in pixel density to make up for that, which nobody currently offers.
I think the bottom line is that you can display the same content as a 7" tablet, only larger, in which case the lower resolution isn't much of a problem (you're using about the same number of pixels per character). Or you can try to squeeze more content on screen than a 7" tablet, in which case if you're particularly sensitive to non-retina text, you'd be left disappointed.
But the real comparison in either case is between retina iPads and everything else, rather than between the iPad mini and other small tablets.