Then why isn't Office on the Surface RT waiting?
I think it's because of the .net framework.
Then why isn't Office on the Surface RT waiting?
Open office has a lot of UI issues. Like most FOSS it has been designed by Geeks and for Geeks. It could be good, but it needs a lot of help.
----------
It really is a bit early to proclaim office is dead. If they were to go another couple of years without a real product on mobile devices people actually use they would start to hurt. As things stand now, they still have time to enter the market and keep their hold.
I found the UI of the current office to be unusable. Open Office is not all that great to use and iLife for iPad is great.
Before I respond ... do you mean iWork?
Before I respond ... do you mean iWork?
iLife is the whole package
----------
You could be right though, can't even remover the name lol So sleepy waiting for invites to be sent out.
I'm not a Microsoft fan but I have to stop you right there. You are clearly misinformed if you think either product is anywhere close to what Office does.
There is still no alternative for macros in Excel, and a million other functions. Just because you don't do anything more than edit documents and sheets does not make your experience typical for the consumer.
It's about time that Apple seriously upgrades the iWork suite to give Office a run for it's money. Microsoft has kept the mac version of Office inferior to the Windows one for far too long, and we are still waiting for an iOS version. No doubt that will also be an inferior version to the Surface version.
I actually think Apple intends to keep iWork as a bare minimum solution. If you look at the history of Apple and Microsoft, they've rarely actually been competition. Microsoft sells an OS, Apple sells devices. That might change as Microsoft's focus changes, but so far they've been pretty good allies.
Notice how there have been 0 lawsuits against WP7/8 from Apple.
That's a good point. It would be nice to at least see an upgraded version of iWork that continues to distils the most useful features of each program. An upgrade that puts just enough pressure on MS to improve their Mac office version further but not enough to annoy them to the point of significantly disrupting their relationship.
I guess it's a fine line to tread for Apple.
"Locally" isn't exactly the strong suit of a tablet. Most people want more access. Check the reviews since the new version came out.No it isn't. I have both the paid QO HD and the new "free" version. Both work locally and allow you to work locally on local documents. Heck, I have a Google Account and store 0 docs in Drive. All my QO docs are local to the iPad and will stay that way, even in the free version.
You can use Google Drive if you want but is definitely not required.
How does that change the interface?I think it's because of the .net framework.
Microsoft needs to break into separate companies. There is no way the Office division should have to wait for the hardware division before becoming established on the iOS platform. What a huge wasted opportunity.
iWork and Google Docs are not sufficient--feature wise--for a large corporation yet. In time they may be, but for the moment Office still has a stranglehold on that market.
No it doesn't
Microsoft needs to break into separate companies. There is no way the Office division should have to wait for the hardware division before becoming established on the iOS platform. What a huge wasted opportunity.
I think the dividing line is who needs those MS Office features.
I bet the majority (>50%) will be perfectly suited to use iWorks and Google Docs.
----------
Doesn't what?
The very fact PC sales are declining means less machines to install office on.
Whats replacing the PC?
iOS and Android, which coincidentally run iWorks and Google Docs.
Your point makes a lot of sense and I do understand what you are saying. But I'm not sure consumers will agree in masses...
Back in the late 70's /early 80's (When I was moving between a C64, TRS-80, Atari 800, Apple II, Amiga, etc) it was obvious that the IBM PC would become the "Standard" in corporate computing. My little group of users (We called ourselves the "Pittsburgh Pirates" ) would meet once a week and dwell on stuff like this!. Since the IBM PC (and clones) were Corporate's world choice of PC, we wondered what machine would emerge as the Industry Standard "Home" consumer computer.... (I myself thought that the Amiga might become the "Consumer Industry Standard Computer")..
At the end of the day (as prices dropped and PC's were equipped with better video and sound cards) the PC also took over the consumer market as well.. Of course by the late 80's the Mac joined my PC in my home office as well and the 2 still sit side by side to this day...
I think we may see something similar in software as well. Why have something different on your home machine as you use all day at work? There are Non-Standard Project Management cheapo packages out there, but I use Primavera P6 at my job and it only makes sense to use on my home machines as well - - same goes for Excel....
I will grant you this, for folks who have a job where they don't use a computer daily, some of these non-standard consumer packages may be a viable option. I don't have a problem with any of them other than I can't risk a document not opening correctly on a clients machine...
Peace.
Aw man! I had the C64 and C128 back in the day and it was awesome! BBSes, Phreaking Long Distance, 300 Baud Modems, Hacking Groups like FBI. I remember games like Bard's Tale, Druid, and Mission Impossible. Those were the days. I really thought the Amiga would take off because the graphics were ahead of it's time. Ah well, thanks for the trip down memory lane!
I thought iLife was just iMovie, iPhoto, and GarageBand?
But, yes, Pages on the iPad has the interface of an updated WordPad. >_>;
... only 4 years after the release of the first iPad.
Meanwhile, how many third-party Office-compatible apps have sprung up to fill that void?
I'm not a Microsoft fan but I have to stop you right there. You are clearly misinformed if you think either product is anywhere close to what Office does.
There is still no alternative for macros in Excel, and a million other functions. Just because you don't do anything more than edit documents and sheets does not make your experience typical for the consumer.
Your falling into the typical MS and Samsung methodology of the software has to include everything, no matter what throw it in. Simple fact is MS could have launched a version of office to fit 99.9% of the consumer market that don't use macros 3 years ago. Then launched a "pro" version to include macros when and if there was a market.