You do know whet ever it is your smoking to make you come up with that has been proven to kill brain cells right?
Am I the only one that thinks this is a bloody awful idea
If you hate Microsoft, fine, but don't post something that is so wrong.
The only mobile entity copying anyone is Google!
For those looking for sample images...
http://www.phonearena.com/news/Noki...-samples-from-the-41-megapixel-camera_id45207
http://www.nokia.com/us-en/phones/phone/lumia1020/
GL
That wasn't my goal. I was merely trying to point out that Microsoft's whole mobile thing is just a poor copy. Nothing wrong with taking inspiration from something, but when you do it so poorly... and I'm not a "Microsoft hater" either. I've used Windows and Windows Mobile all my life (up until they quit the real windows mobile and started their "7 series" crap) and been quite satisfied up until recently when they started on the visual abominations they call "art" that are Mobile 7/8 Series and "Windows 8".
You wouldn't see Apple doing this...
...and if they did, the assumption would be "what on earth.."
"It's not a car, fool! It's a sedan! The distinction makes all the difference in the world"!
You idiot... it's not a car OR a sedan... it's a four-wheeled vehicle.
If Apple did it, it'd have to pass through the three stages of the "Apple's Doing Something Different With Their Stuff" scenario, which usually goes something like...
Stage 1: What is Apple thinking? Tim Cook is an idiot, and this is destined to fail. It's like cheap PC crap. All numbers, no quality.
Stage 2: Wow, this is great! I'd never imagine such clear, crisp pictures coming out of a phone camera. Now watch everyone else copy them with their own cheap rip offs. Why is Apple the only one that innovates?
Stage 3: Apple invented megapixels.
If Apple did it, it'd have to pass through the three stages of the "Apple's Doing Something Different With Their Stuff" scenario, which usually goes something like...
Stage 1: What is Apple thinking? Tim Cook is an idiot, and this is destined to fail. It's like cheap PC crap. All numbers, no quality.
Stage 2: Wow, this is great! I'd never imagine such clear, crisp pictures coming out of a phone camera. Now watch everyone else copy them with their own cheap rip offs. Why is Apple the only one that innovates?
Stage 3: Apple invented megapixels.
+ Stage 4: In a super thin package!!!
To say that MS's current mobile OS is poor copy of iOS just because some ideas where copied (never mind the patent agreements between Apple and MS) is like saying iOS is a poor copy of Android just because iOS copied ideas from Android.
Even on non-high end hardware the OS is fast.
Windows Phone 8 is so unlike iOS that it takes getting used to
I wouldn't say so. Microsoft had a good product and then they were like, "hey, let's totally quit and make an iPhone clone so we can make our mobile division as successful as Apple's, even if it means totally abandoning our current userbase and going after iPhone users while on top of that giving the new product a similar name to the old one so that maybe gullible customers of the old product will be suckered into buying the inferior new one anyway".
You're right, but even my Nokia 6120's Nokia OS is fast on non high-end hardware.
In some ways, the aOS found in the AirPhone 4 is so unlike iOS that it takes some getting used to as well...
Image
...even though they may have taken some inspiration from iOS.
::
No surprise here! 41MP camera, what are you going to do with that, take high res pictures of the moon?
This isn't apple bloody news!
Except MS didn't make an iPhone clone. Go ahead and keep telling yourself that.
What a pathetic argument.
Why not compare the original iPhone to that Nokia and see which phone was faster?
What fool would confuse a Windows Phone with an iPhone?
I don't think there's as big of a "confusion" factor as much as a "poor copy-n-coverup-with-silly-colored-boxes-and-oversized-text" factor.
You've been saying this, but have yet to offer up any proof to back up your statement. So tell me, how is WP 7/8 a cheap ripoff of iOS?
Each in their own element. The iPhone had decent hardware for the time and ran its OS as well as could be expected. It was on par with the BlackBerry and (real) Windows Mobile of the time. The Nokia 6120's software performance was also on par with the hardware of the time, and today's Windows Mobile phone 7/8 series has about as much functionality as one, so it's like having a touchscreen 6120, in software, except perhaps with a serial cable, you could get more functionality in the form of actually using your own ringtones.