First things first, thats not really true, the Wind's and Dell Mini and any other netbook will choke on a Garageband project with multiple tracks when it comes to playback if it doesn't freeze on you first, IMovie, not happening, and IDVD.....your nuts to think you wont be there an entire day to encode, if you even get that far. Now dont get me wrong, netbooks are great for surfing, chatting, maybe listening to music (i've had an aspire one that couldn't smoothly playback itunes), and word processing, but thats about it.
You misunderstood my point. I stated that a netbook will run those applications, I didn't mean under load and I didn't necessarily mean well. But for the purposes of a netbook, the types of use you state above, it functions brilliantly as an OS X machine, as well as if not better than say a custom built Linux distribution for it, or the XP it ships with. Even if it had a Core2Duo CPU in the Mini 9 I wouldn't use it for things like music sequencing as it's hard enough on my 1280x800 13" Macbook, let alone a 1024x600 9" netbook.
At some point people need to accept that apple sells expensive products, period. You can argue back and forth all day wether its worth it or not, but the fact of the matter is you know this from the start, there is nothing to complain about. Its like walking into a porsche dealership and complaining that you cant find anything as cheap as a KIA...you know better than this. (not directed at you personally, but moreso at the general blah blah blah, they need a cheap Mac ideology)
God I'm so sick of the tired car analogies. You WOULD complain if you bought a Porsche only to pop the bonnet and find the engine had FORD written in big letters all over it. This is a far more accurate car analogy than the one you suggest.
People are perfectly within their right to complain that Apple manufacture products from the same components as all other OEMs and charge as much as double for them. There is no obligation to buy them whatsoever, but that by no means removes peoples right to have an opinion about Apple's pricing policy given that they know that underneath the casing are the same components found in many competitors' products at a lesser price.
They have written some great software, which as has been proved by me and many others is perfectly capable of running perfectly well on hardware that was not sold by Apple but is built from the same components as those used by Apple.
Keeping with your car analogies (for the final time), case in point:
Lotus 7:
Caterham 7 (the same design, rights bought from Lotus after they ceased production):
The point?
They're both the same car built from the same parts to the same design and as such will drive just the same as each other; but only the top one has the prestige of being a genuine Lotus.
I hope this finally puts the car analogies to rest.