Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

bluewire

macrumors member
Original poster
Aug 28, 2006
99
0
Bay Area, California
I'm enjoying my new Rebel immensely. I'm looking into getting a nice portrait lens to take family pictures and I was curious if anyone could give me some advice regarding the cannon 85mm f/1.8 or 100mm f/2...

Does anyone have either of these lens or can give me any additional information? I've looked at some reviews and it appears 100mm has the slight edge because I was reading that 80mm is a bit of an interesting focal length...but I'd love that extra third of a f stop

Thanks guys you guys all rox!
 

atari1356

macrumors 68000
Feb 27, 2004
1,582
32
I have the both the 50mm f/1.8 and the 85mm f/1.8 ... I love them both, but find myself using the 50mm one much more often. That's due to the fact that most of the pictures I take are indoors - and find myself backing up too much with the 85mm one. The 50mm is also smaller and lighter, so makes for a smaller camera if I'm going somewhere and only want one lens. (I think the f/1.4 version of the 50mm lens is a bit larger/heavier though)

That said, if your main goal is to get something like head/shoulder portraits, you might consider the 85mm one. You'll get a little better looking bokeh (blurred out background) since it's a longer lens.

Here's one taken with the 85mm lens:

electric.jpg



This was taken with the 50mm:

halloween.jpg



and I'm 90% sure this was taken with the 50mm also:

mother_daughter.jpg



So, you can't go wrong either way with those. I'm not familiar with the 100mm one you mentioned so can't really comment on that.
 

seenew

macrumors 68000
Dec 1, 2005
1,569
1
Brooklyn
well I don't own the 85 or 100, but I have the 50mm 1.8, and if you can get a 50mm 1.4, I highly recommend it. Awesome for portraits.

here's some I've taken with the 50mm 1.8.
the first two are 35mm film, the rest are with a Rebel XT

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/48695642
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/48695701
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/42641417
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/41306930
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/41306670
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/40890521
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/40512040
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/39892122

You can get the 1.8 for like $80.
 

bluewire

macrumors member
Original poster
Aug 28, 2006
99
0
Bay Area, California
Thanks for the sample pixs. I had thought about the 85 or 100 focal length lens being a tad too long especially for indoor stuff. The trade off is that I would want to use that kind of focal length for some outdoor sports related stuff too, possibly in low light and the fast lens would help me indefinately...the 50 would be fast enough but not long enough for me...then again I might try to sock some money away each month for a year to get a one of those fast lens zoomers...

Ah decisions decisions!
 

Cave Man

macrumors 604
I'd go with the 85mm. The problem with the 50mm is that you can get perspective distortion on head-and-shoulder shots, particularly with children. In addition, the 85mm has USM focussing, whereas the 50mm 1.8 does not. At f/2.8, the 85mm is among Canon's sharpest lenses - better than my 200 f/2.8L at any aperture. If you could swing the extra $80, get the 50mm for torso shots or for two or more persons in the frame.
 

Coheebuzz

macrumors 6502a
Oct 10, 2005
511
148
Nicosia, Cyprus
...I would want to use that kind of focal length for some outdoor sports related stuff too, possibly in low light and the fast lens would help me indefinately...the 50 would be fast enough but not long enough for me...then again I might try to sock some money away each month for a year to get a one of those fast lens zoomers...

Ah decisions decisions!

My opinion is that the 100mm on a 1.6 crop will be too long for indoor portrait shots and you may sometimes find it short in some outdoor sport situations. The 85mm would be better for indoor portraits but not very useful in sports.

My advice is to get the 50mm f1.8 for now which is really really cheap and save your money, so you can get a nice 70-200mm zoom for sports later on. This way you have everything covered! ;)
 

OceanView

macrumors 65816
Sep 16, 2005
1,094
39
My opinion is that the 100mm on a 1.6 crop will be too long for indoor portrait shots and you may sometimes find it short in some outdoor sport situations. The 85mm would be better for indoor portraits but not very useful in sports.

My advice is to get the 50mm f1.8 for now which is really really cheap and save your money, so you can get a nice 70-200mm zoom for sports later on. This way you have everything covered! ;)

I have had all of these lenses and for the Rebel, I agree with this statement.
Get the 50mm 1.8, it's cheap and best for portraits.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.