Que the video of Steve Ballmer in 2006 laughing about the iPhone and then in 2014 eating his words. That's Pebble.
I charge my iPhone everyday. Even my Galaxy Note 4 friend charges his everyday too. Face it batteries aren't that great yet.
People who don't own iPhones will get Android Wear. Like you did.
You're being obtuse.
Not everyone is going to spend 200+ for a bunch of features they may not want.
Pebble's "worst" enemy isn't the Apple Watch or Android Wear. It's Fit Bit and those devices which are lower cost and have similar capabilities.
I completely disagree. I'm confused why some posters here believe that anyone who wants a smart watch is going to fork over over $300 for one.
I'm confused by your post, mostly the "anyone" part. I can't speak for "anyone" but me but $350 isn't a particularly scary number to me. Once the final feature set of the Apple Watch is know & complete info on how it works is detailed I'll decide if its right for me. I'm very comfortable with $350-500 for the right smart watch.
I was a Pebble backer... Sold 'em while I could. Inexpensive but not something I want on my wrist plus buggy & limited uses.
I've had Fitbits (Flex, Force, Charge HR), fuelbands, & have a high end Garmin running watch. None of those compete with smart watches IMHO. They are pure activity trackers.
So was GoPro. Your point is?
Que the video of Steve Ballmer in 2006 laughing about the iPhone and then in 2014 eating his words. That's Pebble.
He was wrong about the keyboard.
Context. When I refer to "anyone" here - I don't mean every single person. I am saying that out of all of the people that want a smart watch, not all of them will want to pay 300+ for it. That means there's a market for lower end smart watches.
OK, but that's axiomatic. Out of all the people that want a care not all of them want to pay Mercedes prices. Out of all the people that want a dress shirt not all of them want to pay Canali prices. Ad infinitum.
Ballmer's true failing was his inability to see the smartphone market grow far beyond the business and prosumer niches it had occupied at that time.
Along with abandoning the market MS already had with Windows CE and Mobile.
They had plenty of enterprise users and consumer fans at the time who were familiar with those products, and were okay with them being updated while staying compatible. But MS threw them away.
Many consumer fans continued to use WM for years. Heck, in places like Spain, Italy and Russia, WM ruled a surprisingly long time after iOS and Android came.
As for enterprises, they do not like someone pulling the rug out from under them when they have millions of dollars invested in devices, coding and support. They would've stuck with WinCE if MS had. (Yes, I know it's still around, but you know what I mean.)
Blackberry made the same mistake. Many enterprises were heavily invested in custom BB apps, and felt abandoned by RIM when they pushed their newer systems in a vain attempt to compete on Apple's turf.