Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
A ”simple” solution would be that Apple keeps supporting iOS 18 on devices that can be updated for a longer period until the issues with iOS26 has been solved.
Release an ipsw for 18.7.1 and allow people to downgrade and keep supporting iOS 18 the same way they will do on devices that can’t be updated.

If they cared about their users needs, preferences and desires, this would be what they do and allow.
(downgrading to iOS18).

Frankly, I think they should allow that anytime, anyhow.

It's ridiculous to be forced along their update schedule, especially when they release not ready for prime time things like iOS26, and/or you have a device that simply works better on the previous iOS.
 
Simply having the screen on refreshing at 120Hz drains battery. Take it from me, if you REALLY want to save battery, turn off that energy draining screen, and the processor as well by turning the phone off. Really. My iPhone 16 was fully charged when I got my 17 and transferred data over. I just turned it on to check and currently it’s just at 84% and that’s over 10 days!! That’s probably better battery life than most folks on macrumors.

Turning it back off now and will check it after 20 days. For anyone that has anxiety over battery life, THIS is the way to go.
/s
 
This is actually pretty funny. One has to wonder how iOS 26 got this far in this state. Does nobody at Apple HQ ask questions? Look at analytics data?
So… not 100% sure, but I’d be willing to bet that anyone at Apple uses measurement tools with MAAAYBE a few more points of precision. And, that are built for the purpose of accurate measurement first and foremost and not… I mean, a power strip.
 
So… not 100% sure, but I’d be willing to bet that anyone at Apple uses measurement tools with MAAAYBE a few more points of precision. And, that are built for the purpose of accurate measurement first and foremost and not… I mean, a power strip.

Oh I’m sure they do. I’m absolutely positive that they have a myriad of expensive tools for measuring this kinda thing.

Doesn’t mean they’re actually paying attention to any of the measurements.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: UliBaer
So… not 100% sure, but I’d be willing to bet that anyone at Apple uses measurement tools with MAAAYBE a few more points of precision. And, that are built for the purpose of accurate measurement first and foremost and not… I mean, a power strip.
So you're in denial uh. Battery tests corroborate those findings . Animations and glass rendering drain a tremendous amount of power . It's okay if you want to believe it comes for free or that it's well optimized . but don't gaslight others
 
I wonder then how’s battery life with a regular usage pattern (that probably makes use of these animations far more than a simple app looping test like most like to run) on a 17 series on iOS 26 vs a comparable 16 series on iOS 18 (say, regular vs regular or 17 Pro Max vs 16 Pro Max/Plus, or 17 Pro vs 16 Pro).

That’s tougher to compare with a simple app looping test.
Difificult to compare because the batteries increased, perhaps in an attempt to counterbalance this heavy pwr drain
 
Simply having the screen on refreshing at 120Hz drains battery. Take it from me, if you REALLY want to save battery, turn off that energy draining screen, and the processor as well by turning the phone off. Really. My iPhone 16 was fully charged when I got my 17 and transferred data over. I just turned it on to check and currently it’s just at 84% and that’s over 10 days!! That’s probably better battery life than most folks on macrumors.

Turning it back off now and will check it after 20 days. For anyone that has anxiety over battery life, THIS is the way to go.
/s
Drastic problems require drastic solutions
 
  • Like
Reactions: Unregistered 4U
Oh I’m sure they do. I’m absolutely positive that they have a myriad of expensive tools for measuring this kinda thing.

Doesn’t mean they’re actually paying attention to any of the measurements.
They’re likely paying attention to the measurements. They’ve got measurements right at the chip level that that exclude the charger’s consumption. And, they probably know what frame rate the screen is running at any given time and they know the split between the OLED screen (where the state of the pixels on the screen determines how much power is being used at any moment) and the SoC. It just comes as no surprise to them (me either) that “using the phone” reduces the power in the battery over time.

I haven’t enabled reduce transparency. When that’s turned on, does that mean more bright colored pixels on the OLED screen?
 
So you're in denial uh. Battery tests corroborate those findings . Animations and glass rendering drain a tremendous amount of power . It's okay if you want to believe it comes for free or that it's well optimized . but don't gaslight others
The OLED screen drains FAR more power than the CPU. If what reduce transparency does is to make some pixels, that would have been darker, show up as brighter, then of course it’s going to use more power to show brighter pixels. There’s no way looking at a number on a power strip can show the difference between the higher consumption of a brighter screen and a “tremendous amount of power” drain by the CPU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reverend Benny
They’re likely paying attention to the measurements. They’ve got measurements right at the chip level that that exclude the charger’s consumption. And, they probably know what frame rate the screen is running at any given time and they know the split between the OLED screen (where the state of the pixels on the screen determines how much power is being used at any moment) and the SoC. It just comes as no surprise to them (me either) that “using the phone” reduces the power in the battery over time.

I haven’t enabled reduce transparency. When that’s turned on, does that mean more bright colored pixels on the OLED screen?
Or dark-colored, probably depending on theme
 
Reduce Transparency still computes color based on the background (see the screenshot below), so it’s not surprising that it doesn’t reduce power usage. But maybe it actually adds additional UI layers, and/or (what amounts to) the larger blur radius consumes more power.


View attachment 2561042
Click, got it thanks!
So instead of just displaying a simple image it's having to make a calculation each time!
They really must allow us to turn that off if we want.
 
Or dark-colored, probably depending on theme
I just enabled it on my iPhone 17. With Liquid Glass, pulling down the Control Center reduces the brightness of the screen quite a bit. It’s very noticeably darker. So, anything that doesn’t reduce the brightness of the screen when Control Center is opened is going to appear to use more power. And that TOTALLY makes sense because the total brightness of the OLED pixels directly affects how much power is being consumed.
 
I'm a long time advocate of allowing iOS downgrades when considering performance vs security, it's just that with the current situation, you only have up to 1 week from the date of the newest release and after that you can no longer downgrade iOS and iPadOS. I would downgrade my iPhone 11 Pro Max to iOS 13.7 but since there are missing features, the next oldest version I would downgrade to would be iOS 16.7
 
Quite fascinated that people are shocked over a 17w screenshot power drain when no one has anything to compare it with. We are talking max brightness for a split second, quick access to storage, image processing, what is an acceptable wattage? What wattage do earlier versions consume?

Its obvious that there are issues to be fixed and this guy has done a good job of demonstrating some of them, prob helping towards a solution.
A screenshot does not need brightness settings or any image processing beyond compression. Higher Wattage for compression and writing to disk is acceptable, anything longer than that seems like a bad trade off between superficial eye candy and real function.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ProbablyDylan
A screenshot does not need brightness settings or any image processing beyond compression. Higher Wattage for compression and writing to disk is acceptable, anything longer than that seems like a bad trade off between superficial eye candy and real function.
A screenshot turns the whole screen white for a few milliseconds, that split second the OLED screen consumes a lot of power.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoGood@Usernames
I have been using the reduce transparency feature on my iPhones for a couple of years now because it is part of my low power mode shortcut.
With promotion iPhones, I hate the low power mode drops the refresh rate to roughly 60 FPS, so I use reduce transparency and motion to make the phone feel as snappy as possible.

I really hope that Apple will fix this, or introduce a Low Power Mode similar to the one on MacBook Pros, where the screen is still pretty fluid. At least it feels double as fluid as my 15 Pro does.

Thanks for sharing. I am seriously contemplating removing this from my Low Power Mode shortcut for the time being.
 
A screenshot turns the whole screen white for a few milliseconds, that split second the OLED screen consumes a lot of power.
I think the core idea that “a cell phone showing larger numbers when connected to a power strip MUST be showing precisely how much power the processor is using” completely misunderstands how an OLED screen factors into power usage. Just Googling “what component in a smartphone uses the most power” would have helped to understand it better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reverend Benny
I have been using the reduce transparency feature on my iPhones for a couple of years now because it is part of my low power mode shortcut.
With promotion iPhones, I hate the low power mode drops the refresh rate to roughly 60 FPS, so I use reduce transparency and motion to make the phone feel as snappy as possible.

I really hope that Apple will fix this, or introduce a Low Power Mode similar to the one on MacBook Pros, where the screen is still pretty fluid. At least it feels double as fluid as my 15 Pro does.

Thanks for sharing. I am seriously contemplating removing this from my Low Power Mode shortcut for the time being.
Check your screen when in low transparency mode versus NOT in low transparency mode. I don’t use the mode, but when I did, the screen was across the board brighter when I had low transparency mode on. Even more so for the test case presented here (transparency mode darkens the screen when pulling down the control center low transparency makes the whole screen brighter). A brighter OLED means more power consumption.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.