Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

jsw

Moderator emeritus
Mar 16, 2004
22,910
44
Andover, MA
Well, if you can find a card that's Mac-compatible, then that's what you'd need - AFAIK, there's no other way to get a PMG5 to "see" the SATA II drives as anything better than plain ol' SATA drives.

That card you mentioned?
Drivers are available for all major operating systems, including Windows, Linux, FreeBSD.
Apparently, OS X is not a "major operating system".... :rolleyes:
 

Sun Baked

macrumors G5
May 19, 2002
14,937
157
It's probably not going to matter much, since the max. transfer speeds are only for the cache.

The drives will still be limited to the same sustained transfer speed when the cache runs out.

A bigger better cache tuned towards your specific use may be just as important as trying to maximize the cache's max transfer speeds.

>jsw

The RocketRaid 2320 says PCIExpress/PowerMac G5 on the front page...

http://www.highpoint-tech.com
 

PowerMike G5

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Oct 22, 2005
555
241
New York, NY
Thanks guys ...

So is getting this card to hookup my 2 500GB SATA 2 internal HDs not worth it then? Should I juts hook them up to the main board and use SATA 1 speeds? Or will there be a good enough speed increase if using this card to connect my HDs instead?

Thanks.
 

Bear

macrumors G3
Jul 23, 2002
8,088
5
Sol III - Terra
PowerMike G5 said:
Thanks guys ...

So is getting this card to hookup my 2 500GB SATA 2 internal HDs not worth it then? Should I juts hook them up to the main board and use SATA 1 speeds? Or will there be a good enough speed increase if using this card to connect my HDs instead?

Thanks.
Just use the internal controller.

For the Hitachi 7K500 drive, the maximum sustained data transfer rate from the disk is under 65MB/sec.

The Seagate 500GB Barracuda is 100 Mbytes/sec Max. External Transfer Rate and I expect the sustained rate is not much different than the Hitachi.

Neither drive really offers any benefit being on a SATA 2 controller.
 

Sun Baked

macrumors G5
May 19, 2002
14,937
157
PowerMike G5 said:
Thanks guys ...

So is getting this card to hookup my 2 500GB SATA 2 internal HDs not worth it then? Should I juts hook them up to the main board and use SATA 1 speeds? Or will there be a good enough speed increase if using this card to connect my HDs instead?

Thanks.
Some of the caches are 16MB doesn't matter if you suck them dry with any speed of SATA or ATA, once you burn through the cache -- the drives are limited to their mechanical limits 50-100MB/s.

.1 sec, .2 sec, .3 sec, .4 sec or even a second under ATA or SATA -- once the cache is gone, most of the drives are the same speed, only the marketing, price, and controllers vary.

For transfers that fit in the cache, they are zippy -- after that they all crawl.

They market the bus, and force you to hunt for the max sustained tranfser.

---

Since virtual memory uses the HD as an extension of the memory space, the quickest way to improve performace is to reduce the need for using the VM engine.

Since 100MB/s is a far short of even a G4s measly 1GB/s sustain FSB speeds, and well short of the FSB and memory in the G5s.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.