Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

tubeexperience

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Feb 17, 2016
3,192
3,897
Why doesn't Apple have something between the Mac Mini and the Mac Pro?

Mac Mini is basically an NUC with internals of a MacBook Pro 13"

Mac Pro is a workstation class PC with Intel Xeon processor, ECC memory, FirePro graphics. (It's also terribly priced for it's age.)

I am sure that many would want something in between with desktop class processors, Radeon graphics, etc.
 

tibas92013

macrumors 6502
Jun 2, 2013
486
87
Costa Rica
Mac Mini is like a poor man's Mac.

______________________________________

Do you want a real Mac, but can't afford one?

Oh, at least you can get a Mac Mini.

For only "Poor Men"???, Last year I paid to the Apple ON-Line Store almost $1000 for a Refurbished MM(Late 2014), 2.8GHz, 8GB Ram, 256SSD which IMO is not cheap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: craig1024

Boyd01

Moderator
Staff member
Feb 21, 2012
7,689
4,572
New Jersey Pine Barrens
I was setting up a video editing station last month - not very demanding at this point, I have quite a lot of legacy SD footage to edit. Was considering a new 3ghz mini with the 256gb SSD and 16gb RAM for $1400 at B&H. Just couldn't pull the trigger, seemed like a lot of money for a machine that's only 15% faster than my 2013 i7 MacBook Air.

Instead, I re-purposed a 2012 2.5ghz mini for video editing, it's been my iTunes server for a couple years. Cost me $65 to take it up to 16gb and I replaced the iTunes server with a 2014 base mini for $500.

If Apple actually comes out with a decent update of the Mini, I may go for it and give the 2012 mini to someone for Christmas. If not, maybe they will at least drop the cost of the the existing 3ghz machine to a level that makes it worth considering. But I too would really like something positioned between the current mini and the mac pro. Not very optimistic about the prospects, but you never know. :)
 

sublunar

macrumors 68020
Jun 23, 2007
2,069
1,405
Why doesn't Apple have something between the Mac Mini and the Mac Pro?

Mac Mini is basically an NUC with internals of a MacBook Pro 13"

Mac Pro is a workstation class PC with Intel Xeon processor, ECC memory, FirePro graphics. (It's also terribly priced for it's age.)

I am sure that many would want something in between with desktop class processors, Radeon graphics, etc.

Apple probably need to have considered a cheaper entry level Mac Pro - due to exchange rates I suspect European sales might bomb if Apple find they need to bump the price by an extra 5-10%.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ATC

shaunp

Cancelled
Nov 5, 2010
1,811
1,395
They do, it's called an iMac.

And that's the problem, nobody who wants either a mini or a pro would consider an iMac. The iMac is NOT the product that sits in the middle because it has a screen the others do not. Where is the product that has no screen that sits in the middle? Rhetorical question as Apple will never build this. Why? Because too many people actually want this rather than an iMac.
 

tubeexperience

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Feb 17, 2016
3,192
3,897
They do, it's called an iMac.

Except that a lot of people have their own computer workstation setups with their own monitors, speaker systems, etc.

Here is an example of such a setup:

Battle-Station-All-in-Black-Gaming-Computer-Desk-setup-with-Home-Theatre-and-Triple-Monitors-setup-Corsair-450D-case.jpg


And that's the problem, nobody who wants either a mini or a pro would consider an iMac. The iMac is NOT the product that sits in the middle because it has a screen the others do not. Where is the product that has no screen that sits in the middle? Rhetorical question as Apple will never build this. Why? Because too many people actually want this rather than an iMac.

Why not?

It could be priced the same as an iMac.

Instead of a display and speakers, Apple could fit it with dual Radeon graphics.

Basically an iMac with no display nor speakers, but with dual Radeon graphics.

It would still sit well below the current $2999 Mac Pro since it won't have Intel Xeon processor, ECC memory, nor dual FirePro graphics and would have less memory.
 
Last edited:

Rigby

macrumors 603
Aug 5, 2008
6,222
10,168
San Jose, CA
Apple probably need to have considered a cheaper entry level Mac Pro
That's exactly what I would love to see. A Mac Pro with desktop class i5/i7 CPU, non-ECC RAM, fast consumer-class video card, SSD (RAM and SSD should of course be upgradeable). I'd actually be fine with the trashcan design (love how quiet the Mac Pro is even under load). Perhaps they could strip a few gimmicks (such as the illuminated ports) to further lower the cost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ATC and jpietrzak8

tubeexperience

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Feb 17, 2016
3,192
3,897
That's exactly what I would love to see. A Mac Pro with desktop class i5/i7 CPU, non-ECC RAM, fast consumer-class video card, SSD (RAM and SSD should of course be upgradeable). I'd actually be fine with the trashcan design (love how quiet the Mac Pro is even under load). Perhaps they could strip a few gimmicks (such as the illuminated ports) to further lower the cost.

Exactly. An entry level Mac Pro starting $1999.

The current $2999 starting price makes the Mac Pro an unpalatable option for even the overwhelming majority of the (relatively upscale) Mac community.
 

sublunar

macrumors 68020
Jun 23, 2007
2,069
1,405
Exactly. An entry level Mac Pro starting $1999.

The current $2999 starting price makes the Mac Pro an unpalatable option for even the overwhelming majority of the (relatively upscale) Mac community.

Just wait for the whining when you see the UK and EU prices then :eek:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boyd01

Micky Do

macrumors 68020
Aug 31, 2012
2,204
3,146
a South Pacific island
Mac Mini is like a poor man's Mac.

______________________________________

Do you want a real Mac, but can't afford one?

Oh, at least you can get a Mac Mini.

Tosh. A modestly specced Mac Mini is all the computer many folk need.

Desire more from a Mac? Minis with higher specs are available.

Not enough, and really do need more…..? Don't wish the Mac Mini could be what it isn't. Stump up for an iMac or a Mac Pro.
 

tubeexperience

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Feb 17, 2016
3,192
3,897
Tosh. A modestly specced Mac Mini is all the computer many folk need.

Desire more from a Mac? Minis with higher specs are available.

Not enough, and really do need more…..? Don't wish the Mac Mini could be what it isn't. Stump up for an iMac or a Mac Pro.

Sure, for people that need to write documents, type spreadsheets, and browse the web, the cheapest Mac Mini which has the internal of a MacBook Air (Early 2014) is sufficient.

And then, there're Mac Mini with higher specs, but even the most powerful Mac Mini is only as powerful as a MacBook Pro 13 Retina (Mid 2014).

The next step up is the entry-level Mac Pro which is a workstation PC with Intel Xeon Processor, FirePro graphics, ECC memory.

What I am saying is that there should be something between the higher specs Mac Mini and the entry-level Mac Pro.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ATC and jpietrzak8

enc0re

macrumors 6502
Jun 7, 2010
390
618
Exactly. An entry level Mac Pro starting $1999.

The current $2999 starting price makes the Mac Pro an unpalatable option for even the overwhelming majority of the (relatively upscale) Mac community.

I wouldn't mind paying $2999 for a Mac in the least. But then I want dual NVidia Pascal or a similar top of the line set up.
 

now i see it

macrumors G4
Jan 2, 2002
10,644
22,235
The main problem is most of us are Chevrolet class customers wanting to buy BMW class vehicles (er, computers).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.