Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Hexley

Suspended
Jun 10, 2009
1,641
504
240GB Crucial M500 with firmware MU03 on a 2010 13-inch Macbook Pro with Superdrive through SATA 3Gb/s (300MB/s) interface. Clean install of 10.9.1 + other updates. TRIMM not enabled.

12301079323_8f9edaac19_o.png
 

Hellhammer

Moderator emeritus
Original poster
Dec 10, 2008
22,164
582
Finland
No question! But my issue is the price of SATA III SSDs. ;) I'd assume SATA I & II were cheaper.

They aren't cheaper. It doesn't make sense to design a SATA 1.5Gbps or 3Gbps SSD because the controller is only a small part of the BOM - the biggest chunk comes from NAND. Even old drives are not cheaper because they use NAND with bigger lithography, which is more expensive to produce (the smaller the lithography, the more chips per wafer and hence cheaper $/GB).

Besides, while you may not be able to take full advantage of a SATA 6Gbps SSD, they are much better than 3Gbps designs in terms of random IO performance and especially IO consistency, which are things you'll notice even with SATA 1.5Gbps interface.
 

ElectronGuru

macrumors 68000
Sep 5, 2013
1,656
489
Oregon, USA
Sata III drives also tend to have newer more reliable designs. So even on an older mac, the advantages (read:value) is still good.

On the trim question, my understanding is that the detriments of not having trim come over time as the non-deleted items accumulate. So a test for the benefits would best be done after many months of having it off.
 

Hexley

Suspended
Jun 10, 2009
1,641
504
Other than inefficiencies (non-deletion of items) what else are the drawbacks of not turning on OS X's TRIM and let Crucial's Garbage Collection run?
 

MarvinHC

macrumors 6502a
Jan 9, 2014
834
293
Belgium
Finally made up my mind and bought and installed a Samsung Evo 840 120GB into my late 2008 15" Pro. Process of installing was very easy:

1. Put drive into USB caddy
2. Cloned with super duper
3. Installed in Macbook in place of old HD (only annoying thing were the very tight screws on the hard drive, and why do they need to use such an odd screw design???)
4. Turned on and all worked
5. Checked the firmware installed, found the following: EXT0BB0Q
6. Burned DVD with Samsung firmware EXT0BB6Q
7. Booted from DVD to install newer firmware
8. All went fine (warning that all would be deleted etc) until I got message that this firmware is not compatible (?)
9. Rebooted and all data was still on SSD (again ???)
10. Checked firmware again and now it says EXT0BB6Q (even bigger ????)
11. Installed Trim Enabler (Groths)

All working fine. Speed is about 200 write and 270 read which is what I would have expected (my old Macbook Pro only supports SATA2 i.e. 3 Gigabit)

Boot up (after complete shutdown) does not seem to be much faster but applications definitely open quicker.

So all in all quite easy and cheap upgrade (525 CNY or about 86 US$)
 

Marty62

macrumors 6502
Mar 11, 2010
394
0
Berlin formerly London
154466704.jpg


Samsung EVO 840 750Gb results .... though you're not recommended to do this to a
new SSD !!!

Pretty impressive compared to this :

154466750.jpg


Lacie 1TB Thunderbolt drive on the TB connection, only 5400rpm though!

Martin.
 

heisenberg123

macrumors 603
Oct 31, 2010
6,496
9
Hamilton, Ontario
how are you people taking screenshots of your blackmagic tests?

mine does a read/write test that immediately repeats the test making it near impossible to pause it fast enough to take a screenshot
 

MarvinHC

macrumors 6502a
Jan 9, 2014
834
293
Belgium
how are you people taking screenshots of your blackmagic tests?

mine does a read/write test that immediately repeats the test making it near impossible to pause it fast enough to take a screenshot

There is a screenshot function built into blackmagic, somewhere in the menu.
 

Marty62

macrumors 6502
Mar 11, 2010
394
0
Berlin formerly London
Nice! What machine did you throw it in?

It's in a late 2011 i7 quad 2.4 MBP - bought in July 2012.

Was one of the final pre-retina MBP's and was on "special" so I saved
around €300 on buying it a couple of months earlier.

The EVO has only been in a few months, originally I had a Crucial M4 256 installed
but that failed after just over a year .... the "4000 hrs use" bug.

Martin.

Oh and yup, Speed Disk has a built it capture, paused right at the top of it's
first test, it actually was a touch higher and dropped back about 10MB/s before
I paused it !!
 

OneEyed55

macrumors newbie
Dec 28, 2012
25
1
Manchester, UK
Helllo, I'm considering buying a new internal hard drive for my Macbook Pro 17'' (Early 2009, with 8GB of RAM). Right now it still runs on the drive with which it came (Hitachi HTS723232L9SA62 - 140GB free out of 320), but I'm afraid that it's running a bit slower than it did one or two years ago. I don't want to spend a lot of money, so I've been thinking about buying a Seagate SSHD, in particular this one:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822178339

What do you think? Also, my current drive is a 7200rpm, while the Seagate SSHD I'm considering is 5400rpm. Does this mean that it may not be faster?
 

ElectronGuru

macrumors 68000
Sep 5, 2013
1,656
489
Oregon, USA
There are multiple advantages to SSD. Going with a hybrid skips some of them, like noise and battery life. When I need to save cash, I go smaller. Save money by spending time combing my drive for things to trash.
 

81Tiger04

macrumors 6502
Aug 11, 2009
465
37
SC
Crucial M500

I've got a 15" mid-2010 MBP and want to get a SSD. The price on the Crucial M500 is at $260 right now.

Anyway, I'm about to pull the trigger but one thing is holding me back - the M500 has been out for a while now (April 2013). Any idea when the new model might be coming out? It seems like they should be due for a new one, right??
 

MagicBoy

macrumors 68040
May 28, 2006
3,947
1,025
Manchester, UK
I wouldn't expect an M500 replacement from Crucial/Micron anytime soon. The M4 ran for over two years, the M500 replaced it the second half of last year.

The M500 is more than fast enough to saturate the SATA II connection on a 2010 MBP anyway.
 

Hellhammer

Moderator emeritus
Original poster
Dec 10, 2008
22,164
582
Finland
Just for clarification, though, an M500 is as good as a mid-2010 can do right?

There are better SSDs in terms of performance (especially IO consistency) but the M500 is currently a great bang for the buck and the performance difference is mostly negligible unless your usage is very IO heavy.
 

81Tiger04

macrumors 6502
Aug 11, 2009
465
37
SC
There are better SSDs in terms of performance (especially IO consistency) but the M500 is currently a great bang for the buck and the performance difference is mostly negligible unless your usage is very IO heavy.


Just out of curiosity, what are better SSD options?
 

MCAsan

macrumors 601
Jul 9, 2012
4,587
442
Atlanta
But aren't most consumers looking for the best value...cost vs performance (availability, reliability, throughput)?

I can understand enterprises prioritizing performance above cost considerations.
 

MCAsan

macrumors 601
Jul 9, 2012
4,587
442
Atlanta
Does it matter who you buy an M500 from? Crucial? Amazon? Tiger Direct? Etc?

The product is the same. But the total price (unit price, shipping, tax) may be different. Watch for sales tax. Amazon is now collecting sales tax for some states. That is why I buy from B&H instead.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.