Let's hope that huge new battery doesn't get so hot that you can actually cook bacon on this thing
Or having your eggs fried. A typical american breakfast.
Let's hope that huge new battery doesn't get so hot that you can actually cook bacon on this thing
Or having your eggs fried. A typical american breakfast.
I am pretty sure the technology behind this Retina display is a cooperative effort between Apple and Sharp. Unfortunately when it came time to mass production, Sharp could not meet the yield requirements, and meet Quality Control standards. Apple is using Samsung for fabrication, and Sharp & LG will soon start making the screens too.
Same goes with the A5X, Apple Engineers design it, Samsung fabricates it.
Since Samsung is fabricating a lot of parts for Apple, this is were things get in sticky. Samsung learns from Apples Designs, and then copies those for their products. Apple gets pissed, because they spent all the money on R&D, and thats why we have court cases.
Samsung doesn't really need to copy anything from Apple since they already demoed their 2560x1600 10.1" displays last year.
so 1gb ram, but exactly the same cpu? cpu bums me a little, but atleast the gpu is good
Um I don't understand if samsung makes the display, why won't they put it in their tablets?!!
The "breakthrough in battery technology" is a combination of smaller components overall and the simple engineering choice to make it imperceptably thicker and just barely noticeably heavier. This is great news.
It is also capable of getting hot. This thing is optimized and turbocharged.
Rocketman
Wow did they really go all the way to Australia just to be the first ones to tear down the new iPad??? smh
iFixit went out to New Zealand to be the first to open up the iPhone 3g a few years ago. Certainly not out of their realm to do that.
Any confirmation of this? It would be nice if they could pull the heat spreader off the A5X so we could get a rough estimate of its die size. Hopefully it's not 45nm, otherwise the new iPad might be burning up something other than just mobile OpenGL benchmarks :\
Using the Toshiba eMMC NAND that resides next to the A5X as a reference, we can come up with a rough idea of die size. Based on Toshiba's public documentation, 24nm eMMC 16GB parts measure 12mm x 16mm. Using photoshop and the mystical power of ratios we come up with a rough estimate of 10.8mm x 10.8mm for the A5X die, or 117.5mm^2. If you remember back to our iPad analysis article, we guessed that conservative scaling on a 32nm process would give Apple a ~125mm^2 die for the A5X. While there's a lot of estimation in our methodology, it appears likely that the A5X's die is built on a 28/32nm process - or at least not a 45nm process. Note that this value is entirely dependent on the dimensions of Toshiba's NAND being accurate as well as the photo being as level and distortion-free as possible.
Maybe. They probably will have a higher pixel rear camera than 5mp/1080p video, and a higher front camera than VGA. They might have a higher Ghz chip, lower nm process, more memory, and a variety of other technical specs that are, taken alone, better.Because Samsung will use their own, better displays than "retina" is
Really? Your going to bash them for being *more* clear to their audience? LOLFor the first time iFixit got some information wrong.
They called the product the iPad 3. This is wrong. There is no iPad 3. There is however a iPad (3rd Generation). And it's this that they did pull apart. A little point but they should have gotten it right.
Wait a minute.There's such a thing as giving Apple too much credit. The high resolution is hard to manufacture, so whoever is manufacturing it deserves some credit. Its not hard for Apple to say they want an lcd with XxY resolution. Its now up to the manufacturers to make it happen. Give credit where credit is due.
Give them credit for making the ipad 3, but realize that they didn't create any new technology. The new techs, like high res screen, fast soc, and others, were made by somebody else.Wait a minute.
They took a company with leading edge technology (Sharp) and combined it with a company with leading edge manufacturing (Samsung) and sold the crap out of it (Apple).
Apple did it.
Apple prepaid hundreds of millions of dollars and is post facto paying tens of billions of dollars on manufacture for some screens. Cool screens, but still just screens.
That's some serious mullah. And some serious leaning in the right direction.
Rocketman
When someone already makes the point they did sales not invention, why do you find it critical to reinforce and restate the point? You are a confirmed Apple hater! To no end.Give them credit for making the ipad 3, but realize that they didn't create any new technology. The new techs, like high res screen, fast soc, and others, were made by somebody else.
edit. Also, they didn't even assemble it. They contract other companies like Foxconn to assemble it.
You are a confirmed Apple hater! To no end.