Originally posted by NNO-Stephen
yeah, generally a .exe cannot be opened on a Mac.
Originally posted by paulwhannel
Very rarely are those .exe attachments worth viewing anyway thoOnce you've seen elf bowling once, you've seen it a thousand times...
pnw
It is unusual to find an .exe (Windows executable) file within a .sit (StuffIt) file, because StuffIt is one of the standard compression and packaging formats for Macintosh files as is rarely used for Windows files. In the Windows world, .zip format is the standard for compression and packaging. In the Unix world (which includes Mac OS X), .tar is the standard packaging format and .Z and .gz are the standards for compression.Originally posted by SLJ
hmm, okay thank guys... so if a .sit unpack a .exe? that is still a PC file right?
Anyway to convert it or which 3rd party program do I need to use to open?
exact => 5/5Originally posted by zimv20
unix doesn't identify files by the extension. it uses something inside the file called a magic number.
(individual apps, however, may rely on the extension)
so -- an .exe that doesn't work on unix has problems because it has a missing or malformed magic number (being a PC-only file would cause that), not because of the extension.
as humans, we recognize the .exe extension and associate it w/ windows. but unix doesn't care.
Originally posted by zimv20
as humans, we recognize the .exe extension and associate it w/ windows. but unix doesn't care.
Originally posted by mrjamin
Unofficial Marketing Manager to Wing
Originally posted by mrjamin
Unofficial Marketing Manager to Wing
Originally posted by voicegy
zimv20, someone I sent the link to weeks ago bought one of her cd's and made me a cassette tape of it. It's WONDERFUL!![]()
I have worked hard and I hope you have all found I am improving.
Originally posted by zimv20
unix doesn't identify files by the extension. it uses something inside the file called a magic number.
(individual apps, however, may rely on the extension)
so -- an .exe that doesn't work on unix has problems because it has a missing or malformed magic number (being a PC-only file would cause that), not because of the extension.
as humans, we recognize the .exe extension and associate it w/ windows. but unix doesn't care.
Originally posted by Doctor Q
If a file is a shell script, it may not have to have execute permission because it is the interpreter (e.g., /bin/perl) that must be executable, while the file containing the script only needs to be readable.
Originally posted by Doctor Q
As long as we're explaining how executables work, here are some more details about scripts...
Unix can identify a script (a readable text file containing commands in an interpreted language) by the characters #! at the front of the file. Following the #! you can put the path to the interpreter (an executable that will be invoked to interpret your file). The default is usually the Bourne shell or the Korn shell (e.g., path /bin/sh). This is how shell scripts (Bourne, C, Korn, Bourne again, tcsh, etc.) get invoked. Same for Perl scripts.
If a file is a shell script, it may not have to have execute permission because it is the interpreter (e.g., /bin/perl) that must be executable, while the file containing the script only needs to be readable.