Microsoft never "beat them to the punch" they simply have fast switching between things. Cable/Satellite is outdated, I canceled my subscription 3 years ago, I don't want the hassle of having to watch things when they want to play it. The winner will be who can easily get to and play content the fastest & easiest
Xbox didn't "beat" anyone to anything. Xbox was and still is a lousy TV platform - it is still controlling your Cable/Sat box with IR repeaters, like it's 2002. And it has no visibility to your DVR recording. This is not the future of TV, it's the past.
.
Unfortunately for Tim, xbox one beat them to the punch. All Apple can do is get a couple network deals and lay their UI on the TV experience. If they are allowed to BE the cable provider, it will be an improvement over the xbox and will be amazing, but we know that is not happening.
They only "beat them to the punch" if you know what Apple has planned for the TV. Do you?.
Unfortunately for Tim, xbox one beat them to the punch. All Apple can do is get a couple network deals and lay their UI on the TV experience. If they are allowed to BE the cable provider, it will be an improvement over the xbox and will be amazing, but we know that is not happening.
When has Apple ever forced you to buy a single product?I seriously hope we are not forced to buy a new TV either.
When has Apple ever forced you to buy a single product?
Like any other company, they'll put out a product and you can decide whether it's worth buying at their price.
lolwut? So saying "Xbox, on" and then waiting through several loading screens and that big stupid Xbox logo and then undoubtedly using a remote to switch through your channels is more "magical" than just using a remote to turn things on in the first place?Xbox did beat Apple in showing the world how voice control can be used on a TV. It will not be magical anymore...
I just bought my first HDTV three weeks ago. A Vizio 37" flatscreen for $85 at a thrift shop.Guys, don't you see it? There is a grand vision. Apple 4K TV set for only $999
My oh my...
Personally, I'm starting to think the iTV rumors (which even Apple keeps stoking) are a ploy to keep Apple's share price "up".
At least I think so until someone shows me the system.
RGDS,
Technologically, Xbox1 is interesting. But it's too expensive. It will appeal to gamers only (or mostly) like all dedicated game consoles before it. Most "normal" mass-market consumers will not spend hundreds of dollars on yet another box sitting under their TV set - even if it can also be used for TV, Skype etc.
.
Unfortunately for Tim, xbox one beat them to the punch. All Apple can do is get a couple network deals and lay their UI on the TV experience. If they are allowed to BE the cable provider, it will be an improvement over the xbox and will be amazing, but we know that is not happening.
I seriously hope we are not forced to buy a new TV either.
You're making an assumption that whatever new plans Apple has for their TV, it won't involve the actual TV hardware itself. That's kind of a big assumption isn't it?Uhhhh.. I guess for some people it pays to type more so they can understand.
Ok, "force you to buy a new TV" instead of offering it as a cheap add on to an existing TV (like current AppleTV).
Make sense?
...although he did use "Magical" at several other places in the interview. You'll probably have to wait for an actual product announcement to hear "Revolutionary", probably in a few weeks at WWDC when the latest OS X and iOS are announced.Well at least Cook is using new words to hype products.
"Grand Vision" is a refreshing change from "Magical & Revolutionary"
Now that's something I would readily drop $1K on today. I don't imagine we will see that sort of price on 4K tech for at least 2 more years, though.Guys, don't you see it? There is a grand vision. Apple 4K TV set for only $999
...although he did use "Magical" at several other places in the interview. You'll probably have to wait for an actual product announcement to hear "Revolutionary", probably in a few weeks at WWDC when the latest OS X and iOS are announced.
----------
Now that's something I would readily drop $1K on today. I don't imagine we will see that sort of price on 4K tech for at least 2 more years, though.
I'm pretty sure the Xbox One is one of the most publicly hated announcements in Microsoft's history...
Xbox did beat Apple in showing the world how voice control can be used on a TV. It will not be magical anymore...
lolwut? So saying "Xbox, on" and then waiting through several loading screens and that big stupid Xbox logo and then undoubtedly using a remote to switch through your channels is more "magical" than just using a remote to turn things on in the first place?
No. The Xbox One is just a device that will turn your HDTV into a bad smartTV, with all the gimicky voice and motion controls that provide no extra benefit to the consumer whatsoever.
.
Everything MS does is hated these days. They'll announce something new, people will proclaim it as crap on messageboards, and you'll see tons of 10 page writeups as to why MS is no longer relevant on various tech blogs.
Then word of mouth kicks in, and things start moving. It sells slowly at first, then picks up momentum, and after all is said and done, they've sold millions of the thing.
It's the way the tech world works. MS is the company who can do no right. Apple...well...they used to be the company who could do no wrong, but recently people have been beating on them almost as much as MS. Now Google is the new golden child. Pretty soon, MS'll do something neat enough to really get everyone's attention, and will be the heralded as the scrappy billion dollar underdog.
.
Unfortunately for Tim, xbox one beat them to the punch. All Apple can do is get a couple network deals and lay their UI on the TV experience. If they are allowed to BE the cable provider, it will be an improvement over the xbox and will be amazing, but we know that is not happening.
I seriously hope we are not forced to buy a new TV either.