But, can we bring the debate about the voting system to this thread as well?
I don't know, maybe something with server, issues. But, can we bring the debate about the voting system to this thread as well?
"Maybe we should remove the voting because it is inconsistent."
"No, keep the voting because it's easy to see the useless posts."
"Remove it because it only causes trouble with 'you downvoted me' 'he up voted you...'"
"KEEP ALL THE VOTES!!!"
Image
No. Please restrict your discussion of that issue to this thread: Can we please remove the vote buttons?
What would you choose? Overall or negative vs. positive?
I'd vote for a 4 week moving histogram of up and down votes per day, displayed as a sparkline.
I see we're not allowed to comment on the site without it being turned into a joke.
I see we're not allowed to comment on the site without it being turned into a joke.
He could have been serious. If MR ever got enough visits and votes then perhaps, but otherwise it's not feasible.
That said, you're right about the breakdown-- if they are going to show votes, they might as well show the total breakdown. A 0 could be -20/+20, which would be a controversial comment.
I can't really see how a graph would be effective even if we had more traffic and it was changing all the time.
It would show when the activity (up and down votess) happened. If there's a total of 100 votes on a post, I'd like to know if they all came at once, shortly after it was posted, or whether there's an ongoing stream of readers actually reading it and voting on it. It's just more detailed data, and because it's a sparkline, it occupies a small amount of space.
It wouldn't have to be time-limited at 4 wks. It could taper off non-linearly, so the first 1/4 of the graph can represent all recorded votes older than 3 wks, with the first point everything older than 9 wks (3+6), the next 6 represent weekly votes, and 3/4 of the graph is just plain linear (3 wks).
Not that I expect this to happen. Nor do I expect the separate up and down counts to happen either.