Yet again; proposed internet monitoring

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by rainman::|:|, Dec 20, 2002.

  1. macrumors 603

    rainman::|:|

    #1
    Well, the Bush administration is at it again, this time preparing to propose requirements to ISPs that enable the government, through a national center, to monitor the internet.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/20/technology/20MONI.html
    (free registration required)

    I can imagine most of your opinions, but let's hear what you have to say :) i, for one, think this is a step in quite the wrong direction - Sure the 'net isn't perfect, but the thought of a virtual (no pun intended) gestapo running wild gives me the creeps beyond anything hackers, pornographers, and yes even terrorists can do on it--

    pnw
     
  2. macrumors 6502a

    #2
    I thought they already monitor this? Anyway they will be catching only terrorists and hardcore hackers, right? So whats the problem?
     
  3. Wes
    macrumors 68020

    Wes

    #3
    I bet they've been doing it for years, but they are just saying this so they can go public.
     
  4. macrumors 6502a

    #4
    Or we are just a bit too paranoid :D
     
  5. macrumors 6502a

    #5
    Let's let the government take away our last form of free communication.

    If you want people watching your activity online, that's fine, but I don't. I think the government can find better things to use time and money for.

    What's next? USE WINDOWS OR THE TERRORISTS HAVE WON!
     
  6. macrumors 6502a

    zarathustra

    #6
    Feel a bit melodramatic? Considering that most adequate hackers/comp geeks can trace, intercept and otherwise follow information on the internet, you don't feel concerned about that?

    While I don't think that they want to "control" the internet, monitoring does you no harm if you are doing nothing illegal...
     
  7. macrumors 6502a

    #7
    Honestly, nobody has anything to worry about if they're not doing anything illegal.
     
  8. macrumors 68000

    pgwalsh

    #8
    The government wants to monitor the Internet like they do the phone lines. They're only looking for keywords in text. A certain number of keywords combined in a paragraph will popup an alert.
     
  9. Wes
    macrumors 68020

    Wes

    #9
    That's going to be a hard thing to do.

    The words: Bin Laden, crash, aeroplane, kill, bush.

    Could just be:
    Person 1: I wonder how long until they catch that Bin Laden dude.
    Person 2: Hey my grandmother was in a car crash!
    Person 1: Was she killed?
    Person 2: No, just a little shaken up, the other person was distracted by an aeroplane going over.
    Person 1: Did she hit anything?
    Person 2: Just a bush.

    A little far-fetched, but not easy.
     
  10. Moderator emeritus

    Rower_CPU

    #10
    What makes the gov't think that terrorists communicating in this fashion wouldn't use a code of some sort...or that they'd even communicate in English for that matter? :rolleyes:

    *goes back to work at underfunded educational facility for foreign language instruction*
     
  11. Wes
    macrumors 68020

    Wes

    #11
    I saw a show a while ago detailing how the terrorists could stay without being detected using those digital monitoring programs. One way was, using a text editor to look at a jpeg and to view all the code that gets the picture to show up. Then you can add text in without effecting the image. This image can then be sent, and the receiver can open it in a similar program to reveal the message. They demonstrated this method and it seemed rather easy to do.
     
  12. macrumors regular

    #12
    SCARY!

    What about privacy? I don't really want the government watching over my shoulder as I dredge the net for hardcore porn. What about when I research information on drugs i'm about to experiment with? Some activities are illegal even when they shouldn't be.

    This is like granting the power of God over people's digital lifestyles. Internal Intelligence at this scale has never existed before; who knows how it will be wielded. If knowledge is power, then omniscience is omnipotence.

    SCARY!
     
  13. macrumors 68000

    pgwalsh

    #13
    Re: SCARY!

    The government doesn't care if you're into porn. They can't use that against you and why would they. Are participating in illegal activity against the US? However if you were into kiddy porn then I hope they do put you away.
     
  14. macrumors 604

    MrMacMan

    #14
    Re: Re: SCARY!

    Well you see the goverment likes to know what your doing every day. Did you have a bad day? Maybe a good day, did he give exact change or not enough.
    Is he a good person?
    Does he like to look at pron when he is mad or happy, does he have friends, is he single, married, kids?
    This is all one big system.
    Ah, some of you might remember I said i was being personally taped, well I still am and it seems I have a 'yellow flag' on me which means any gov't office should stop me if I have more than a wallet on me.
    :rolleyes:
    Anyways... This means they can Monitor you, I don't belive they can use it in a Case Against you, they need warents and maybe hard proof.
    Besides, WHO WATCHING KIDDY PORN.
    [Warning The Dept. Of Homeland security is now monitoring this Topic]
     
  15. macrumors 6502a

    #15
    If this happens I am going to go walk down to the capitol and throw my own poop @ senators.

    I wonder if I would make the evening news? ;-)
     
  16. macrumors 68020

    alex_ant

    #16
    Anyone who thinks internet monitoring is a good idea should read 1984, because you obviously haven't yet.
     
  17. Wes
    macrumors 68020

    Wes

    #17
    I really should read that book! I hear so much about it, but have never read it. Sounds a bit like Minority Report.
     
  18. macrumors 603

    OutThere

    #18
    Well, if you have nothing to hide then the government can watch all they want and you will have no way of knowing it, but the fact that they would be watching everything and you would have knowledge of it poses some serious moral issues. Just imagine sending IM's to your girlfriend and having some guy hunched over a computer watching everything you say. There would be nothing to stop him from watching your love-infused conversation stream by on his screen. He would be legally there to watch everything on the internet, in search of suspicious activities, but as someone mentioned (sorry, i didn't remember who you were and didn't want to lose everything I had written) terrorists could post a picture of their favorite car in that post and encode secret messages to their fellow evil-doers. Would someone monitoring the router that it passed through suspect that there was anything going on. I think not. There are so many Jpeg images on the internet that the government could never possibly monitor all of the image traffic for suspicious coding. Unless we have elected some very strange congressmen, I believe that the opinion of the general public will be to turn down this proposal, and that the congressman should support the views of the public and turn down this proposal.

    Thats My 2¢
     
  19. macrumors 603

    OutThere

    #19
    In addition to my last post...what happened to the "less government in our lives" that GWB peddled in his campaign. If this were to go through this would be a major breach of his "Philosophy."
     
  20. macrumors 68030

    cr2sh

    #20
    That's a very idealistic point of view.

    If I'm doing nothing illegal they have no reason to be watching me. They're watching me because they're assuming I'm going to be breakign the law. I'm guilty already, all they need is evidence. Is this what a government is suppossed to do?
     
  21. macrumors 603

    rainman::|:|

    #21
    They're already doing *this*, it's an FBI project called Predator (hunts out the "meat" from the rest), they want to take it further and have an actual center full of employees reading our email, monitoring websites, hell eventually hacking our computers ("for our own good")... Thx guys for backing me up, you don't have to be breaking the law to enjoy privacy, history shows us that WHEREVER the government gets involved, bad things happen. Would you people want the gov't going through your postal mail? then why your email? I'm no gov't conspiracy nut, but this is inevitably the first step towards censorship...

    Why is it when another country tries to take away our freedom, thousands of men and women are ready to lay down their lives to prevent it, yet when this happens you people roll out the red carpet? My god, some of you people don't have any clue what freedom you enjoy...

    :)
    pnw
     
  22. macrumors member

    #22
    its actually called carnivore. and its not powerful enough to scan the ENTIRE internet. TIA will try to accopmlish this.

    you may not be looking at kiddy porn or downloading warez, but what if you're badmouthing Bush or the gov't in general? Bush himself said "Dissent is treason." So if somebody talks bad about him, they could be tried for treason:eek: doesnt that BOTHER you??

    i hope you all remember what ari fleischer had to say

    "watch what you say"
     
  23. macrumors 603

    solvs

    #23
    Who says you have to be doing something illegal for it to be private? I don't want the government to be watching me no matter what I'm doing. Next they'll have camera's in our bathrooms (didn't you guys see the Daily Show the other day?). Maybe we're being paranoid, but this how it starts. Pretty soon you have a police state where even the innocent are not safe.

    And it's not "the government". It's a bunch of people working for the government. Do you trust some strange person watching you, judging you? Monitoring what you do? If you don't care, think about it for a second. You might start to realize how creepy it is (unless your voyeuristic or something).

    Then they're telling you what to do, how to do it, how to think, what to believe. Don't think it could happen? Anyone heard of Iraq? Anyone notice when someone is accused of something in this country, especially if it's broadcast on the news, they're automatically assumed guilty. People believe what they hear. Read 1984. It's a pretty scary thing, but mostly because of how easily it could happen.

    Anyone heard of Nazi Germany?

    America is supposed to be about freedom. Innocence before being proven guilty. It doesn't always work, but "give me liberty, or give me death". When we start to give up our freedoms for our safety, we really begin to lose sight of what this country suposed to be all about. People should be more p*ssed about this.

    Besides, I prefer KITTY porn:
     

    Attached Files:

  24. macrumors regular

    #24
    If Bush said "Dissent is treason," and you didn't agree with his tactics, where is the line drawn between free speech and dissent? Solvs is right in saying "this is how it starts." Change doesn't occur in miles, it starts in inches. You give up one, and another, until you've headed over a mile. Monitoring me is an invasion of privacy, whether I'm doing something illegal or not, because my life is my business, not theirs. Monitoring assumes that I have done something of suspicion. I thought we were all innocent until proven guilty.

    Honeyed words said during a campaign are no promise that the leader will stick to them. Unfortunately.

    Agreed.
     
  25. macrumors 6502

    pianojoe

    #25
    principiis obsta
     

Share This Page