Thoughts on the Sony cyber shot cameras!

[nicolle19]

I am looking at purchasing the new
Sony Cyber-shot 8.1-Megapixel Digital Camera - Black

Model: DSC-T100/B

8.1-megapixel CCD captures high-resolution images up to 3264 x 2448 pixels
5x optical/2x digital zoom; Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar lens
3" color LCD monitor with 230K pixels

This camera isnt out yet in the black but thinking about buying. Has anyone had any previous versions of this. How did you like it? I doubt I will even use the full 8.1 but like the 5x zoom and the 3in lcd.

[Lovesong]

About a year ago I got the then-new T9 model. It's a cute little camera, and does pretty well in terms of performance. The thing I love about it is that it's as small as my iPod, and I can carry it with me everywhere (unlike my 5D and lenses bag). It's great for taking to parties, and getting snapshots. The battery life is impressive.
There are a couple of downsides to it, but most of these are a personal preference. For one, there is no optical viewfinder (or any for that matter), so everything has to be framed from the LCD. The low-light performance is typical for an ultra compact, so if you're planning to do much available light stuff, forget about it. Last thing that kind of annoys me about it, is the fact that as of yet I have been unable to take a flash indoors shot without getting red-eyes. I know that this is typical for all ultracompacts, so I'm not really worried about it.
The T100 looks like a great camera, and I'm sure you would be pleased with it.

[Plymouthbreezer]

I love my CyberShot, even though it's an old model from about three years ago. I still use it as my backup camera / out for the night P&S, since my D70s obviously is my primary camera.

Nonetheless, they are solidly built and take decent photographs. I can't tell you how many times I've dropped my CyberShot (and one time, kicked it across a school hallway by accident), and yet it has yet to malfunction.

[robPOD]

My family just brought a T-10 its sweeet as, takes real good photos too.

[EricNau]

I am looking at purchasing the new
Sony Cyber-shot 8.1-Megapixel Digital Camera - Black

Model: DSC-T100/B

8.1-megapixel CCD captures high-resolution images up to 3264 x 2448 pixels
5x optical/2x digital zoom; Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar lens
3" color LCD monitor with 230K pixels

This camera isnt out yet in the black but thinking about buying. Has anyone had any previous versions of this. How did you like it? I doubt I will even use the full 8.1 but like the 5x zoom and the 3in lcd.
I love my Sony CyberShot, but I was looking at that model in the store last week and I love it even more. :D

[Sweetfeld28]

Nothing against you for wanting, or have a Sony, but i have never like their cameras.

Here are two reasons why:

1. You have to buy/use the stupid Sony MemoryStick.
2. Some of their decent cameras still use Double-AA batteries.

just my 2 cents.

[EricNau]

1. You have to buy/use the stupid Sony MemoryStick.
How is this any different than other camera manufacturers? I've purchased 4 different digital cameras and each one used a different memory card. Besides, you don't have to purchase a Sony MemoryStick - SanDisk has a line as well.
2. Some of their decent cameras still use Double-AA batteries.
This is a plus in my book. You can buy rechargeable AA batteries with equal capacities , for a fraction of the cost when compared to battery packs.

[beige matchbox]

This is a plus in my book. You can buy rechargeable AA batteries with equal capacities with equal capacities, for a fraction of the cost when compared to battery packs.

Not to mention there is a fair chance someone nearby is selling AAs :cool:




I had a DSC-P8, brilliant P&S imo, would still be using it now if it hadn't decided to try turning itself on in my pocket stripping a tooth off one of it's zoom gears :rolleyes:
I'd buy another Sony P&S if i needed to get another, i've been looking at the old P10's on eBay for some time :o

[flyfish29]

Nothing against you for wanting, or have a Sony, but i have never like their cameras.

Here are two reasons why:

1. You have to buy/use the stupid Sony MemoryStick.
2. Some of their decent cameras still use Double-AA batteries.

just my 2 cents.

I love sony cameras...had three of them. My latest is the cybershot w50 I think...very compact, takes great pics. My only complaint is the wheel you use to select the mode tends to get bumped sometimes and is on a non-automatic mode before I realize it...but luckily has not messed up any of my shots of my kids...plenty of flexibility/adjustability for everyday use too.

I actually dont mind the memory stick- they are dirt cheap right now, very reliable and if I ever get my PSP I can use one of them there!!!

I have never (and would never) buy a camera with AA batteries. I have always opted for the lithium Ion battery pack and bought a second one to always have a charged spare. The battery charger in my sony is quite small and just plugs straight into the wall. They make a smaller one to buy, but the one provided works for me.

Believe it or not, there are still many people who will only buy an AA type battery camera...these are the people who never remember to charge their batteries each use or at regular intervals so they always want to be able to buy new batteries if they run out. That is the only reason sony makes them...sony is a pretty good "green" company and has historically done pretty decent at reducing packaging...course they can always do more in that arena!


This is a plus in my book. You can buy rechargeable AA batteries with equal capacities , for a fraction of the cost when compared to battery packs.

Yes, but you will end up paying way more over the life of the camera if you use AA, but for ease of use it is better if you don't always charge things...but I never forget and always have an extra one charged up at all times.

I avoid SansDisk products...had a couple of bad experiences with off brand PS2 memory cards and one SansDisk memory stick so I stick to Sony. Not that they won't ever have problems, but I don't want to risk losing important pics of my family because I wante dto save $10 or $20 bucks.

Just my $.50!:D

[Sweetfeld28]

My Bad about the Memory Stick, I did not know that SanDisk had a card that would work in Sony Cameras. Another thing, i don't under stand why someone would want to keep spending $4-5.00 at a time to buy batteries constantly, while on the other hand you could just get a camera with a rechargeable battery [or buy even rechargeable AA batteries].

But, i don't know, i was just trying to help some people some money.

[flyfish29]

My Bad about the Memory Stick, I did not know that SanDisk had a card that would work in Sony Cameras. Another thing, i don't under stand why someone would want to keep spending $4-5.00 at a time to buy batteries constantly, while on the other hand you could just get a camera with a rechargeable battery [or buy even rechargeable AA batteries].

But, i don't know, i was just trying to help some people some money.


And here I was going to defend your comment...I just figured you meant any Memory Stick card...sony or other brand. Oh well.:rolleyes:

I agree, definately saves money, but in today's world of forgetfullness and convience many don't seem to care about the money part. I sometimes wish I didn't have to care so much either11:D

[EricNau]

Just to clear some things up: you can (and should) buy rechargeable AA batteries, but instead of paying $30-$50 for a rechargeable battery pack, you pay $5-$10 for two AA batteries. You are, in fact, saving money.

My Sony camera came with 2 AA NiMH rechargeable batteries with 2500 mAh capacity, and a charger. I take a ton of pictures, but have only needed a second set after 3 years, which cost me $10.

[flyfish29]

Just to clear some things up: you can (and should) buy rechargeable AA batteries, but instead of paying $30-$50 for a rechargeable battery pack, you pay $5-$10 for two AA batteries. You are, in fact, saving money.

My Sony camera came with 2 AA NiMH rechargeable batteries with 2500 mAh capacity, and a charger. I take a ton of pictures, but have only needed a second set after 3 years, which cost me $10.

I agree that is a very good option. Does your camera show you how much charge is left on your AA rechargeables like it does for a battery pack?

I like the fact that I always have a full charge battery pack so when I download my pics and longer movies from my camera I don't have to worry about not having a full charge and it kicking the bucket during the pic upload. Just an ease of mind thing I prefer I guess.

A person would want to buy two sets probably so they have one to fall back on if the first set dies...so you might be looking at $20 total with a charger and four AA's...at least in that neighborhood. I have some AA rechargeables at our school we tried in the digital cameras we have and they don't last real long. NOt bad, but not great...especially when taking 100 pics plus movies off cameras every few weeks or so.

[EricNau]

I agree that is a very good option. Does your camera show you how much charge is left on your AA rechargeables like it does for a battery pack?
Yes, it sure does. :)

I like the fact that I always have a full charge battery pack so when I download my pics and longer movies from my camera I don't have to worry about not having a full charge and it kicking the bucket during the pic upload. Just an ease of mind thing I prefer I guess.

A person would want to buy two sets probably so they have one to fall back on if the first set dies...so you might be looking at $20 total with a charger and four AA's...at least in that neighborhood. I have some AA rechargeables at our school we tried in the digital cameras we have and they don't last real long. NOt bad, but not great...especially when taking 100 pics plus movies off cameras every few weeks or so.
Actually, in terms of mAhs, my Sony rechargeable AAs hold just as much, if not more than many of the battery packs they offer. And like I said, I've been known to take hundreds of pictures a day, and I have yet to actually run out during the day (I re-charge them every night). Plus, my first pair lasted me 2-3 years, and when I finally needed a replacement, it cost me $10. :cool:

The only downside to AAs is the bulk - you'll notice all of the small cameras use battery packs.

[andiwm2003]

ah, i want one in red. but my 3 year old sony dsc-p150 still works great. so i can't justify the expense. seems they are out of stock everywhere including at sony style.

in general my experience with sony cameras is very good. good sensor and lenses, fast focus and intuitive handling, robust. the only drawback on these cameras is the weak flash but that comes with the small size.

[iLoveMyMBP]

Nikon Coolpix are really sweet

[UnclePaulie]

I just ordered the Cybershot DSC-T100 in silver. I really wanted the black one, but the silver was available for immediate shipping on Amazon and I'm impatient. I will hopefully get it next week and I'll let you know what I think.

[andiwm2003]

I just ordered the Cybershot DSC-T100 in silver. I really wanted the black one, but the silver was available for immediate shipping on Amazon and I'm impatient. I will hopefully get it next week and I'll let you know what I think.

let me know if it has a full manual mode. some people said the DSC-w200 has no manual mode.

btw: the 12MP W200 and the 8MP T100 cost both $399.-. the target the same market. i think that is a strange lineup. i would go for the t100 because of the 5x zoom and the 3"screen. the 12mp are mostly marketing i think.

what are your thoughts?

[Abstract]

I'd get the 8 MP camera simply because the 8 MP camera probably takes nicer photos than a 12 MP camera.


And no, the cameras don't target the same market. The 12 MP camera is targeted to people who don't know better, while the 8 MP camera is for people who know that from a point and shoot camera with a much smaller sensor, you'd be better off getting a 6 MP camera than an 8 MP camera, but since it's almost impossible to get a 6 MP camera with today's generation of sensor technology, getting a 7 MP or 8 MP camera is the best you're going to get.

[mattcube64]

I bought a Sony DSC-N2 in early February, and I absolutely love it. It's compact, it's got a nice finish, and it's easy to use. The touchscreen is awesome. Oh yeah, and it takes GREAT pictures. The 10MP resolution is great for some basic cropping, and the colors and white balance have been great on nearly every pic I've taken.

[UnclePaulie]

I would say that in addition to the megapixel difference and 3x versus 5x optical zoom the other main differences between the W200 and the T100 cameras is that the W200 is a "compact" camera because its dimensions are slightly bigger and it has a lens that protrudes from the body when it's turned on. The T100 is an "ultra-compact" with slightly smaller dimensions and a non-protruding lens.
If I had to take a guess, the W200 will probably win in image quality due to its larger sensor 1/1.72 versus 1/2.5 on the T100. Also the larger, protruding lens on the W200 has faster shutter speeds and a larger aperture range. I'm basing this on past experience (Fuji Finepix Z1 and Finepix F30). The F30 with a protruding lens and a bigger sensor made a huge difference in image quality, but now I have a larger, heavier camera that I'm more reluctant to carry around.

[UnclePaulie]

In case anyone is still following this thread, I finally got my Sony CyberShot DSC-T100 from Amazon today. I must say that I am very impressed. I am coming from a Fuji Finepix F30 which took great pictures and had manual controls, but I just like the look and feel of the Sony more. It has almost no manual controls (you can set ISO, Exposure Compensation, Pre-set White Balance) but it is very impressive to have a camera in such a small package that has takes 8 MP pictures with a 5x zoom and Optical Image Stabilization. The menus and settings are also much more user friendly than the Fuji. Face detection focus looks like it would come in handy in real-world situations. And the 3 inch LCD on the back is amazing, it gets fingerprints on it very easily, but it is so bright and so well detailed. If anyone has any questions, just let me know.

[EricNau]

In case anyone is still following this thread, I finally got my Sony CyberShot DSC-T100 from Amazon today. I must say that I am very impressed. I am coming from a Fuji Finepix F30 which took great pictures and had manual controls, but I just like the look and feel of the Sony more. It has almost no manual controls (you can set ISO, Exposure Compensation, Pre-set White Balance) but it is very impressive to have a camera in such a small package that has takes 8 MP pictures with a 5x zoom and Optical Image Stabilization. The menus and settings are also much more user friendly than the Fuji. Face detection focus looks like it would come in handy in real-world situations. And the 3 inch LCD on the back is amazing, it gets fingerprints on it very easily, but it is so bright and so well detailed. If anyone has any questions, just let me know.
Thanks - keep us updated as you play with your new toy! :D

...I'm thinking of buying one of these myself.

[sjl]

Actually, in terms of mAhs, my Sony rechargeable AAs hold just as much, if not more than many of the battery packs they offer.

Which says absolutely nothing. I could (hypothetically speaking) produce two battery packs. One can provide 20,000 mAh, the other just 500 mAh. But if the former does so at a voltage of just 1 volt, and the latter at 60 volts, the latter holds more overall power (50% more than the former, to be precise, assuming constant current at constant voltage).

To add to the fun, though, there's also the question of what the load is like. It's no good having a 60 volt pack if the device needs 100 mA at 3 volts; the device will blow up when you connect the 60 volt pack, unless you have a DC-DC converter in the circuit somewhere to shift the 60 volts down to 3 volts.

When it comes to battery life, the only really useful apples-to-apples comparison is a set of batteries in a single given device. In that situation, you can compare AA NiMH batteries to a purpose-built lithium ion pack and get a legitimate result, but that result is good only for that particular camera. Different camera means a different result. Comparing mAh ratings is absolutely meaningless when you're also altering the type of battery. (so mAh can be useful to compare two different brands of NiMH AAs, for example, but not to compare NiMH AAs with a lithium ion battery.)

This is why, for example, NiMH batteries perform so much better than alkaline batteries in flashes and similar tasks: they have a lower internal resistance, so can provide a much higher current for a longer period of time. Doesn't necessarily mean they store more power, just that they are better suited to the job in question. There are other tasks (handheld torches spring to mind) where alkalines perform better because they need a higher voltage but lower current.

(Yes, I did a couple of years of electrical engineering before I dropped out to do computing instead. Does it show? :D)

[aafuss1]

The T100 has the Bionz processing engine that's used in Sony's Alpha DSLR.

[andiwm2003]

......................................... It has almost no manual controls (you can set ISO, Exposure Compensation, Pre-set White Balance) ..............................

i'm thinking about getting this camera. either for me or for my girlfriend as a birthday present.

can you set the exposure to let's say 30sec for a night shot? my dsc-p150 can do that and i would miss that functionality. it's not a dealbreaker though.

how do you like the 5x zoom?

[UnclePaulie]

can you set the exposure to let's say 30sec for a night shot? my dsc-p150 can do that and i would miss that functionality. it's not a dealbreaker though.

how do you like the 5x zoom?

There are twilight and fireworks modes available on the camera for night shots, but they increase the shutter speed without any user input. Now that you brought it up, I am going to miss that feature too.

The 5x zoom is pretty nice to have in my opinion. It's a good thing this camera has optical image stabilization plus digital stabilization, the zoomed-in photos have no blurring.

[buffalo]

Dang, that is a nice looking camera. I want one!!! How can I justify the expense? The family already has a perfectly good Nikon D50. Maybe I should get the Sony for a Spain / Italy trip I'm taking in June? Who wants to take a DSLR overseas?

[MimUK]

Head over here and see some of the impressions its making.

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/forum.asp?forum=1009

It seems to be going down well.

Mim

[buffalo]

I hope the OP doesn't mind me hijacking the thread.

How would the Cybershot compare to this Nikon Coolpix S50 (http://www.nikonusa.com/template.php?cat=1&grp=2&productNr=25558)? Feature wise it's seems fairly comparable... 7.2 megapixels compared to t100's 8.1. 3x optical zoom compared to 5x. Other than that, is there anything major that I am missing? I really shouldn't be looking at a new camera, so the s50's $300 price-tag would be more bearable.

[andiwm2003]

I hope the OP doesn't mind me hijacking the thread.

How would the Cybershot compare to this Nikon Coolpix S50 (http://www.nikonusa.com/template.php?cat=1&grp=2&productNr=25558)? Feature wise it's seems fairly comparable... 7.2 megapixels compared to t100's 8.1. 3x optical zoom compared to 5x. Other than that, is there anything major that I am missing? I really shouldn't be looking at a new camera, so the s50's $300 price-tag would be more bearable.

the 5x zoom would be a major advantage for me. the image stabilization is a must have for me as well. the megapixels are not that relevant. i would prefer the sony because i have good experience with them. but i also bought a fuji for my mom and the camera is great.

so if the 5x zoom isn't that important to you then save money and get the fuji or any other older model. because the only thing that is new is the zoom. the rest was available in last years models and you can save a lot of money if you buy those.

[Fuzzy Orange]

I was actually thinking of buying a red T100 for walkaround/street photography. There have been many photo opportunites that I've missed beacuase I don't have my clunky DSLR with me. And besides, the red color is smokin'.:cool:

[buffalo]

Is near $400 the best price that I will be able to find? Any chances of discounts between now and June, or do Sony's prices stay steady like Apple's.

[nicolle19]

In case anyone is still following this thread, I finally got my Sony CyberShot DSC-T100 from Amazon today. I must say that I am very impressed. I am coming from a Fuji Finepix F30 which took great pictures and had manual controls, but I just like the look and feel of the Sony more. It has almost no manual controls (you can set ISO, Exposure Compensation, Pre-set White Balance) but it is very impressive to have a camera in such a small package that has takes 8 MP pictures with a 5x zoom and Optical Image Stabilization. The menus and settings are also much more user friendly than the Fuji. Face detection focus looks like it would come in handy in real-world situations. And the 3 inch LCD on the back is amazing, it gets fingerprints on it very easily, but it is so bright and so well detailed. If anyone has any questions, just let me know.

After much research I decided to purchase this camera from sony style.com I purchased the black one which looks pretty sweet it should be here on the 24th. If you go to the website they have a credit card offer if you sign up, you can use it one time before you get your card at sonystyle. When you make your first purchase they will give you a $100 credit to your bill 8-12 weeks later plus 0 % for 12 months. Although I hate applying for credit cards and having them couldnt miss the discount. I just went to BB and got the memory card for it the 2 gig for $49 bucks. Does anybody have any suggestions on using a camera like this on the beach in Mexico. I didnt get the service plan, just want to make sure it dosent get messed up by sand and the weather. Example ziplock bag as cover.

[flyfish29]

Does anybody have any suggestions on using a camera like this on the beach in Mexico. I didnt get the service plan, just want to make sure it dosent get messed up by sand and the weather. Example ziplock bag as cover.


I used mine on the beach and just was careful and kept it inside a neoprene case zipped up tight. My neoprene case was like a sleeve really and zipped up very tight and would be water resistant as neoprene is water resistant. But I only took it once or twice to the beach for pics of the kids. You could use a ziplock over a regular case just to be save...I would get one of the zipper ziploc bags.

They also make cases specifically made for wet conditions to seal out everything- just do a search at an outdoor online retailer like REI.com or EMS.com or llbean.com.

Good luck

[nicolle19]

I used mine on the beach and just was careful and kept it inside a neoprene case zipped up tight. My neoprene case was like a sleeve really and zipped up very tight and would be water resistant as neoprene is water resistant. But I only took it once or twice to the beach for pics of the kids. You could use a ziplock over a regular case just to be save...I would get one of the zipper ziploc bags.

They also make cases specifically made for wet conditions to seal out everything- just do a search at an outdoor online retailer like REI.com or EMS.com or llbean.com.

Good luck

Thanks REI.com has some good cases.

[roland.g]

I have a T-30, slimmer style model that I got last May. 7MP. Great camera. Love it.

[Plutonius]

I'm waiting on the Sony H9 (Supposed to be out on May 11th). Impressive specs for an ultra-zoom.

http://www.sonystyle.com:80/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/eCS/Store/en/-/USD/SY_DisplayProductInformation-Start?ProductSKU=DSCH9/B

[buffalo]

I went ahead and bought the black t100 from Best Buy tonight. They didn't have it in stock, but I wanted to apply a coupon so I went ahead and bought it and will pick it up June 1. After taxes, I paid about $420 for the t100 and a 2gb memory card. I'm looking forward to taking it to Spain and Italy in less than three weeks.

[epicwelshman]

I had a Cybershot DSC-H1 for a while, and my dad has had a couple of Sony compacts and we've both been very impressed with the quality. The images are much nicer than my mother's Casio and the cameras themselves seem quite durable.

[epicwelshman]

I'm waiting on the Sony H9 (Supposed to be out on May 11th). Impressive specs for an ultra-zoom.

http://www.sonystyle.com:80/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/eCS/Store/en/-/USD/SY_DisplayProductInformation-Start?ProductSKU=DSCH9/B

Like I said above I have the H1 and have always been very impressed. I have a dSLR now, but for an ultra-zoom I think the Sony's are pretty high up there in terms of quality. Despite the inherent shortcomings of an advanced P&S it's a very capable camera and it's nice to have essentially a 50-300mm zoom in one camera rather than lugging around heavy lenses.

[Plutonius]

I ended up getting the H2 instead. A store was clearing out the H2's to make room for the H9's and I got a new H2 for $160.00 :).

Like I said above I have the H1 and have always been very impressed. I have a dSLR now, but for an ultra-zoom I think the Sony's are pretty high up there in terms of quality. Despite the inherent shortcomings of an advanced P&S it's a very capable camera and it's nice to have essentially a 50-300mm zoom in one camera rather than lugging around heavy lenses.

[Xenious]

I bought one last month as an upgrade to my old T-1 for a holiday trip. I think it is an excellent point and shoot camera. The size is good, the lcd screen and photo quality are excellent and as usual the "Start to shoot" time is very small. (Handy for when ol Steven Tyler walks by or your baby does something cool.)

The new UI takes a little getting used to if you had another sony previously. If this was your first one it might not be so strange and it is friendly. If you are concerned check it out in a best buy or other store first.

I wish they had a little more metal on it (like the older T1), but it seems very durable so far. No poor build issues.

Battery life is as stated (I think the estimate was 300 pictures or so on one charge). Performace is better than my T1 was on its first charge. I went most of a week on holiday without having to re-charge. Of course recording video takes more juice.

If you like leather cases the nicer sony ones (39$) have a great feel, soft leather and are easy to open/close with the magnetic latch.

The only things to remember are:
1) The flash is small (as with all T series). This means in really dark situations your flash won't light too far. This is somewhat mitigated by the stabalization feature and the new 3200 ISO.

2) It does take a while to charge the battery (3-4 hours as stated). If you are going to be taking more than 300 pictures or so on one charge you might want a 2nd battery.

-Jim

[roland.g]

Now I'm jealous. Got a T30 last year. Great camera, but would love the 5x optical zoom and a slightly better battery.

[buffalo]

I just noticed that I bought a 2GB Sony memory stick PRO Duo and I the t100 just uses a memory stick Duo. At the time I thought they were the same. It came with a "Memory Stick Duo Adaptor" that it looks like I could use. Am I alright keeping it, or should I go ahead and return it for a memory stick Duo?

[flyfish29]

I just noticed that I bought a 2GB Sony memory stick PRO Duo and I the t100 just uses a memory stick Duo. At the time I thought they were the same. It came with a "Memory Stick Duo Adaptor" that it looks like I could use. Am I alright keeping it, or should I go ahead and return it for a memory stick Duo?
You can go to the sony web site under support and there you can search to see what memory sticks work with what cameras. Then you can decide-

the PRO duo is faster and more storage...
from Wiki...
Memory Stick is a removable flash memory card format, launched by Sony in October 1998 [1], and is also used in general to describe the whole family of Memory Sticks. This family includes the Memory Stick PRO, a revision that allows greater maximum storage capacity and faster file transfer speeds; Memory Stick Duo, a small-form-factor version of the Memory Stick (including the PRO Duo); and the even smaller Memory Stick Micro (M2). In December 2006 Sony added the Memory Stick PRO-HG, a high speed variant of the PRO, to be used for high definition still and video cameras.

wiki @ memory sticks (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_Stick)

I also think the adaptor is to use the duo in a regular memory stick camera or drive...but don't quote me. I have one and assume that is what it is for, but have never used the adaptor

[buffalo]

The Pro duo works fine in the camera. I don't know what I was thinking earlier.

[mkgm1]

I bought a Black T9 (6 MP, 3x optical zoom) last January immediately after it came out. I paid a ridiculous amount for it (£300 :S) and a new one came out a few months later...which annoyed me greatly.

But since then I've grown to love it. It's an awesome camera. It looks fantastic. The photos are great. Its so slim, so well designed, I can and do take it everywhere. It's perfect for me.

Before that I owned some random cheap DSC (3 MP...no optical zoom) which frankly was just plain poor.

[Overclocker]

Just watch out on the flash. I still have my Cybershot T-1 and the flash sucked big time. Once the subject was out of the 1.5m range it just acted as though it didn't flash at all. VERY annoying...

[jburns]

I'd get the 8 MP camera simply because the 8 MP camera probably takes nicer photos than a 12 MP camera.



I'd love to hear your rational for that statement.

[jlcharles]

12MP crammed into such a small sensor is usually a good way to introduce noise. Larger photosites usually equals less noise.