Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Community Discussion > Apple, Industry and Internet Discussion

View Poll Results: Are you going to move to Linux?
Yes, I don't want iOS in my Mac 6 21.43%
No, staying with Mac 19 67.86%
No to Linux, but I am going with another OS. 3 10.71%
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 24, 2012, 08:31 AM   #1
ajvizzgamer101
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: United States
Moving to Linux?

If Apple merges iOS and OS X (or OS 11) will you move to Linux or other OSes? I have a lot of friends annoyed that iOS/OS X might merge one day. They have said that Linux is the future of computing if Microsoft and Apple continue abandoning there core users. Many others like Gabe Newell, and Notch both have been pushing for Linux support for there games.
__________________
500GB Macbook Pro 2007 (OS X Mavericks)
250GB Retina Macbook Pro 2013 (OS X Mavericks)
16GB iPhone 5 (iOS 7)
32GB iPad 2 (iOS 7)
ajvizzgamer101 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 08:43 AM   #2
maflynn
Moderator
 
maflynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Boston
No, I've used Linux before and while its ok, the measure of an operating system is its ability to run applications. For Linux it fails miserably (for me) in that department because it does not have the apps I need, i.e., iTunes, MS Office, LightRoom, and Photoshop to name a few.
maflynn is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 08:57 AM   #3
opinioncircle
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: May 2009
I use Ubuntu as a spare time OS ever since 2008, while having OSX, Windows'es on the side as well.

Linux needs to be fully stable for me to get it to be a primary OS. What I love about Linux is the ability to set it up on any computer, even on my 2006 HP former laptop.

Ubuntu has done a phenomenal job, and hope this goes further down the line...
__________________
2009 13" Unibody Macbook Pro & 5G iPod
opinioncircle is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 09:10 AM   #4
roadbloc
macrumors 604
 
roadbloc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK
Send a message via Skype™ to roadbloc
I actually moved more back to Windows when Lion was released. Whereas there are some good Linux distros, the majority of them a trash and none of them are as good as commercial OSs.
__________________
roadbloc is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 09:21 AM   #5
greg12345a
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
I don't think so. I was using linux few years back, and for home only use it's brilliant but if you need PC for more creative purposes (pro audio for me) os x (or windows) is the only way.
greg12345a is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 09:30 AM   #6
cube
macrumors G3
 
Join Date: May 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by opinioncircle View Post
Linux needs to be fully stable for me to get it to be a primary OS.
Linux is stable. What it lacks is commercial non-enterprise applications.
cube is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 10:39 AM   #7
Renzatic
macrumors 604
 
Renzatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Who puts the washers in the woods?
The dearth of commercial software is the one major reason why I haven't scooted over the Linux land yet. If you're not a hardcore power user, you can easily find some decent open source alternatives to most of the programs you use daily. But for me, the lack of Photoshop, Modo, and Office keeps me from making the jump.

It's a shame we don't have a huge linux organization pushing for more commercial support. Anything that currently runs on OSX could be ported over fairly easily. Photoshop probably wouldn't even take Adobe a month to get up and running. But as long as the Linux scene believes in open source above all else (instead of a healthy mix a'la Windows and OSX), and doesn't have a single core set of standardized APIs, popular Linux support isn't going to happen.
Renzatic is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 10:46 AM   #8
Gutwrench
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by cube View Post
Linux is stable. What it lacks is commercial non-enterprise applications.
Agree. Stable enough for IBM Sequoia.
Gutwrench is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 11:30 AM   #9
Ariii
macrumors 6502a
 
Ariii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago
Send a message via ICQ to Ariii Send a message via AIM to Ariii Send a message via MSN to Ariii Send a message via Yahoo to Ariii
Linux is a great consumer OS. Most consumers just don't know about it yet. People still want to keep their expensive price tags on software, so it won't be a good professional OS just yet.

The GNU Manifesto pretty much explains my opinion on it.
Ariii is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 12:45 PM   #10
Jessica Lares
macrumors 603
 
Jessica Lares's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Near Dallas, Texas, USA
No, because while Ubuntu looks great, the overall Linux environment makes me feel like I'm running Windows 95 app-wise, some of it is very clunky. Plus, the apps in general aren't created with the user in mind and are very basic.

And running software under some wrapper is just not worth it to me.
__________________
Have You Hugged Your Mac Today?
Daily Expressions | iMac G4 | Late 2011 13" MacBook Pro | iPod Nano (7G) | iPad Mini | iPod Touch (5G) | iPhone 5S
Jessica Lares is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 01:53 PM   #11
Cactii
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vancouver
I just wrote another post on a similar subject. Hope you don't mind me posting the link. http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1494936

I've been playing around with this Elementary Os - OSX Look Alike and I'm pretty impressed with how fast it is on my girlfriends little Aspire ONE netbook.

The drawback on any Linux Distribution is the professional application availability. If Adobe would jump on board I would seriously consider it.
Cactii is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 02:34 PM   #12
ucfgrad93
macrumors G5
 
ucfgrad93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
No way would I ever move to Linux.
ucfgrad93 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 02:45 PM   #13
leenak
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
I used Linux for a couple years about 20 years ago but I didn't care for it much. I liked the BSD variants a bit better but still wouldn't use those as my primary OS.
leenak is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 02:54 PM   #14
hrsetrdr
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
My Macs run OS X, my PCs all run either Debian, Fedora or CentOS Linux operating systems.

Unix, and Unix-like operating systems have been the backbone of enterprise computing since 1969; Unix-like systems will continue to be involved at the center of cutting edge science & technology, at least until the year 2038.
hrsetrdr is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 03:26 PM   #15
G51989
In Time-Out
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NYC NY/Pittsburgh PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariii View Post
Linux is a great consumer OS. Most consumers just don't know about it yet. People still want to keep their expensive price tags on software, so it won't be a good professional OS just yet.

The GNU Manifesto pretty much explains my opinion on it.
No, its a terrible consumer OS due to lack of useful programs.

Hell, I use Debian for my home network servers, and its awesme, and I mess without with tons of distros in my free time.

But, no Linux distro outside of Android is useful to a consumer, OSX and Windows are much better.

OSX has a libary of software twice the size of what you can get for any linux distro, Windows has a libary 100 times the size of OSX. So for a consumer its a no brainer.
G51989 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 03:49 PM   #16
Ariii
macrumors 6502a
 
Ariii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago
Send a message via ICQ to Ariii Send a message via AIM to Ariii Send a message via MSN to Ariii Send a message via Yahoo to Ariii
Quote:
Originally Posted by G51989 View Post
No, its a terrible consumer OS due to lack of useful programs.

Hell, I use Debian for my home network servers, and its awesme, and I mess without with tons of distros in my free time.

But, no Linux distro outside of Android is useful to a consumer, OSX and Windows are much better.

OSX has a libary of software twice the size of what you can get for any linux distro, Windows has a libary 100 times the size of OSX. So for a consumer its a no brainer.
Many people simply only use office programs, web browsers, and music applications on their computers 90% of the time. There's plenty of great applications for that.
Ariii is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 05:06 PM   #17
KnightWRX
macrumors Pentium
 
KnightWRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Quebec, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by leenak View Post
I used Linux for a couple years about 20 years ago but I didn't care for it much.
Linux, 2 years after its release, was a much different beast than Linux today. I don't really think you can judge it by what it was around then.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by G51989 View Post
No, its a terrible consumer OS due to lack of useful programs.
It has tons of useful programs. I ran it as my only OS prior to running OS X. It just depends on your needs. The KDE project itself pretty much nailed about every "consumer" need out there, OpenOffice/LibreOffice closes the loop.

It's even easier today than it was back in the late 90s, early 00s when I used it as my only desktop OS.
__________________
"What you leave behind is not what is engraved in stone monuments, but what is woven into the lives of others."
-- Pericles
KnightWRX is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 05:31 PM   #18
ChristianJapan
macrumors Demi-God
 
ChristianJapan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: 日本
I like Linux and used SUSE and (K)Ubuntu for many years.
Once I got a good raw file converter (Bibble Pro, now Corel) I made a full switch from Windows to Linux.
But each upgrade there was the higher risk of something break. Specially in area of graphic card driver was always a delay because the developer decided to change interfaces/API too easy.

I keep using Linux/Unix/FreeBSD but in the backend as server, backup, archive, NAS, but for UI I want something smoother. Mac OS fit the bill.

Let see in which direction the merger finally goes ... Maybe iOS gets more from Mac OS (like several windows). Now the recent change in Apples leadership team might bring a different push...WWDC 2013 interesting to see
__________________
Member of MacRumors.com Folding@Home Team (#3446) & developer of the F@H Mobile Monitoring app

Last edited by ChristianJapan; Nov 24, 2012 at 05:40 PM.
ChristianJapan is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 05:36 PM   #19
G51989
In Time-Out
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NYC NY/Pittsburgh PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariii View Post
Many people simply only use office programs, web browsers, and music applications on their computers 90% of the time. There's plenty of great applications for that.
BUT, at least when it comes to Office, Microsoft is the standard, and anything else pretty much doesnt work.
G51989 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 05:58 PM   #20
Ariii
macrumors 6502a
 
Ariii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago
Send a message via ICQ to Ariii Send a message via AIM to Ariii Send a message via MSN to Ariii Send a message via Yahoo to Ariii
Quote:
Originally Posted by G51989 View Post
BUT, at least when it comes to Office, Microsoft is the standard, and anything else pretty much doesnt work.
If you use Word in a business, then yes. Many people don't need MicroSoft Word to do text editing. Apps like AbiWord and LibreOffice are a great alternative, and they usually run much faster than Word as well.
__________________
Indigo iBook Clamshell, MacOS 9; Lime iBook Clamshell, Panther;
MacOS 9 users: Use Classilla | MacOS 9 Lives
I'm on IRC at #macrumors on irc.krono.net
Tumblr
Ariii is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 06:25 PM   #21
G51989
In Time-Out
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NYC NY/Pittsburgh PA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariii View Post
If you use Word in a business, then yes. Many people don't need MicroSoft Word to do text editing. Apps like AbiWord and LibreOffice are a great alternative, and they usually run much faster than Word as well.
Now, not to sound like a Microsoft fanboy, because I'm not. I buy whatever works best.

But I've used Abiword, and LibreOffice a lot, and they are both garbage compared to office.

Office is one of the few things microsoft does right.
G51989 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 06:50 PM   #22
Renzatic
macrumors 604
 
Renzatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Who puts the washers in the woods?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariii View Post
...LibreOffice...usually run much faster than Word as well.
Not from my experiences. LibreOffice always felt slower and clumsier to me. It gets the job done, but it's not the most graceful and smooth thing in the world.
Renzatic is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 07:02 PM   #23
boss.king
macrumors 68040
 
boss.king's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by G51989 View Post
But I've used Abiword, and LibreOffice a lot, and they are both garbage compared to office.
I second this, Office is far and away the best suite in it's category in my opinion.
__________________
LG Nexus 4
iPad Mini
boss.king is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 07:21 PM   #24
Ariii
macrumors 6502a
 
Ariii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago
Send a message via ICQ to Ariii Send a message via AIM to Ariii Send a message via MSN to Ariii Send a message via Yahoo to Ariii
Quote:
Originally Posted by G51989 View Post
Now, not to sound like a Microsoft fanboy, because I'm not. I buy whatever works best.

But I've used Abiword, and LibreOffice a lot, and they are both garbage compared to office.

Office is one of the few things microsoft does right.
What is it that makes MS Word better than AbiWord? It's scriptable with Perl, Python, and Shell, and I've liked its interface. I've also found it to render most documents quite well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Renzatic View Post
Not from my experiences. LibreOffice always felt slower and clumsier to me. It gets the job done, but it's not the most graceful and smooth thing in the world.
Oops.... I meant to refer to using AbiWord as a word processor and LibreOffice as an alternative to Excel, etc. Sorry.

I've always found LibreOffice to be much slower as well.
__________________
Indigo iBook Clamshell, MacOS 9; Lime iBook Clamshell, Panther;
MacOS 9 users: Use Classilla | MacOS 9 Lives
I'm on IRC at #macrumors on irc.krono.net
Tumblr
Ariii is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 07:34 PM   #25
leenak
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by KnightWRX View Post
Linux, 2 years after its release, was a much different beast than Linux today. I don't really think you can judge it by what it was around then.
I know there are differences and people successfully use it as a desktop OS, but it doesn't meet my needs. I like OSX, I don't care for Windows, I feel more comfortable using Unix based OSes for work but I'd still choose Windows over Linux for a desktop OS.
leenak is offline   0 Reply With Quote


Reply
MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Community Discussion > Apple, Industry and Internet Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OS X vs Linux? redxblood OS X 121 Aug 18, 2014 06:23 AM
Linux oldhifi Windows, Linux & Others on the Mac 3 Jan 14, 2014 10:13 AM
linux help frank55 Windows, Linux & Others on the Mac 2 Aug 15, 2013 03:47 PM
Free Ubuntu Linux/basic Linux manual? RedCroissant Windows, Linux & Others on the Mac 7 Feb 6, 2013 12:48 AM
Resolved: FCP - Moving audio and video together when moving into timeline samstah Digital Video 2 Jun 3, 2012 07:22 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC