Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old May 17, 2007, 02:26 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
iPhone Receives FCC Approval



FCC Documents indicate that Apple has received FCC approval for the iPhone.

Apple submitted the documents to the FCC on March 8th. Approval was granted today, May 17.

Last edited by Doctor Q : May 17, 2007 at 06:05 PM.
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:28 PM   #2
notsofatjames
macrumors 6502a
 
notsofatjames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wales, UK
Send a message via MSN to notsofatjames Send a message via Yahoo to notsofatjames
i didnt think there would have been much chance that it wouldnt have got approval. Apple must have been designing this for years. Maybe someone technically minded can divulge some extra information out of the information revealed here though...
__________________
Search before you post: MRoogle

Last edited by notsofatjames : May 17, 2007 at 02:33 PM.
notsofatjames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:32 PM   #3
TheSlush
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New York, NY
Send a message via AIM to TheSlush
Nice... as if there was any doubt!
__________________
"There are three kinds of people: those who can count and those who can't."
TheSlush is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:33 PM   #4
Clive At Five
macrumors 65816
 
Clive At Five's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: St. Paul, MN
Quote:
Originally Posted by notsofatjames View Post
Apple must have been designing this for years. Maybe someone technically minded can divule some extra information out of the information revealed here though...
This has little to nothing to do with the OS development or form... just that the radio devices meet certain standards and whatnot.

Yes, it's an important benchmark but it doesn't really boast Apple's brilliance or anything.

-Clive

(500th post! Avatars, here I come!)
__________________
My Mod: G4 Cube + Atom 330 CPU + Wiimote = Ultimate HTPC!
Clive At Five is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:33 PM   #5
milhous
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: May 2007
On the road to launch!

Rock on Apple!
milhous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:33 PM   #6
LxTxNx
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
wooo hooo I wonder how long it will take apple.com to update the FCC disclaimer in small print on the iphone page.
LxTxNx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:34 PM   #7
QuarterSwede
macrumors 68030
 
QuarterSwede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
The FCC approval, Serial and IMEI # will be laser etched onto the back of the iPhone.
__________________
Help stop children from viewing internet pornography.
What happened to all the great leaders?
QuarterSwede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:35 PM   #8
notsofatjames
macrumors 6502a
 
notsofatjames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wales, UK
Send a message via MSN to notsofatjames Send a message via Yahoo to notsofatjames
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuarterSwede View Post
The FCC approval will be laser etched onto the back of the iPhone.
maybe this means we can have custom engraved messages like iPods, or it opens it up to be laser-engraved by the network (here in uk, all networks seem to brand their phones, dont know what its like over your side of the atlantic)
__________________
Search before you post: MRoogle
notsofatjames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:40 PM   #9
MacbookSwitcher
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tokyo, Japan
The approval is dated "02/06/07", so it looks like it happened more than 3 months ago..
MacbookSwitcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:40 PM   #10
oclor
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Iowa City
Jobs said the reason it would be released in June was because the FCC approval takes a while. Doesn't this show that it was approved 2 months ago?
oclor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:41 PM   #11
p0intblank
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Jersey, USA
Send a message via AIM to p0intblank
Woooo! This is nothing but excellent news.

But who in the world voted this as negative? I don't get people sometimes... but yeah, kudos to Apple! Almost there!
p0intblank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:42 PM   #12
Squonk
macrumors 65816
 
Squonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
That is one step closer to an iPhone in my hands!!! Yeah!!!
__________________
iSwitched in 1988
MP quad 2.8 (4GB/1.5TB/ATI 2600), iPhone, iPods

Squonk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:42 PM   #13
LxTxNx
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
I've never seen an IMEI thats alphanumeric meaning both letters and numbers. It's always 15 numbers


if you dont believe me dial *#06# on your GSM-Phone keypad your IMEI will display

Last edited by LxTxNx : May 17, 2007 at 02:54 PM.
LxTxNx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:43 PM   #14
Chaszmyr
macrumors Demi-God
 
Chaszmyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Boulder, CO
Send a message via AIM to Chaszmyr
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacbookSwitcher View Post
The approval is dated "02/06/07", so it looks like it happened more than 3 months ago..
I don't know where you're seeing that... The documents on the website say they hadn't been submitted yet by that date.
Chaszmyr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:45 PM   #15
WildCowboy
macrumors god
 
WildCowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: nowhere near the infinite loop anymore
The documents indicate that Apple submitted them to the FCC on March 9th. After evaluation by the FCC, authorization was granted today.

From the approval letter...notice the right side:

Click image for larger version

Name:	Picture 1.png
Views:	456
Size:	23.1 KB
ID:	74467
__________________
15" 2.4 GHz MacBook Pro -- 15" 1.67 GHz PowerBook -- 14" 1.2 GHz iBook
WildCowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:46 PM   #16
Digital Skunk
macrumors 68040
 
Digital Skunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Primarily in my Head
--YAWN!--

Wake me up when it's on Sprint's network in 5 or so years. (-_-)

I will be very happy with my soon to be Palm 755p and 2GB micro SD cards. I ain't paying $1200 to switch to a reasonably better company just to get a kick arse phone... I will pay half that and keep my reasonably good company and upgrade to a reasonably kick arse phone.

By the way... Apple's iPhone division... you suck!
__________________
What do I have?, stuff that I actually use for work! Some old, some new, all effective.
Digital Skunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:48 PM   #17
yetanotherdave
macrumors Demi-God
 
yetanotherdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Weston-Super-Mare, England
Send a message via AIM to yetanotherdave Send a message via MSN to yetanotherdave Send a message via Yahoo to yetanotherdave
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacbookSwitcher View Post
The approval is dated "02/06/07", so it looks like it happened more than 3 months ago..
Or next month, depending on which way you stand on your head.

I wish we could all use a standard date format, or an unambiguous one like 17-MAY-2007
__________________
yetanotherdave.com | twitter.com/yetanotherdave
Uni MacBook Pro SD | 2.66Ghz Core2Duo | 320Gb | 4Gb | 10.6.2
iPhone 3g White 16Gb
yetanotherdave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:50 PM   #18
Peace
macrumors Demi-God
 
Peace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: On top of the Storm Peaks waiting for the Time-Lost Proto Drake
Looks like the user manual was submitted May 11th and is under short-term confidential until July 1st.

http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Sum&calledFromFrame=N&RequestTimeout=500&application_id=378848&fcc_id='BC GA1203'

Last edited by Peace : May 17, 2007 at 02:56 PM.
Peace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:51 PM   #19
notsofatjames
macrumors 6502a
 
notsofatjames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wales, UK
Send a message via MSN to notsofatjames Send a message via Yahoo to notsofatjames
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrAtheist View Post
Or next month, depending on which way you stand on your head.

I wish we could all use a standard date format, or an unambiguous one like 17-MAY-2007
by chance are you from UK? Dates here are backwards when compared to US eg. 12/4/2007 =4/12/2007 =
Im all for 17-MAY
__________________
Search before you post: MRoogle
notsofatjames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:54 PM   #20
Digital Skunk
macrumors 68040
 
Digital Skunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Primarily in my Head
Quote:
Originally Posted by notsofatjames View Post
by chance are you from UK? Dates here are backwards when compared to US eg. 12/4/2007 =4/12/2007 =
Im all for 17-MAY
I am partial towards May 17th. I just think it works better when you know what month it is first, then the day. Call me a good ole American cowboy.
__________________
What do I have?, stuff that I actually use for work! Some old, some new, all effective.
Digital Skunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:54 PM   #21
SpaceMagic
macrumors 68000
 
SpaceMagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Munich, Germany
Have you read the Confidentiality letter ? Tis funny Apple trying to cover their backs.
__________________
MacBook 2Ghz Core2Duo, 320GB HD, 3.3GB RAM + 24" LG LCD
SpaceMagic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:55 PM   #22
SeanMcg
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Arlington, VA, USA
More Docs..

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macrumors View Post


FCC Documents indicate that Apple has received FCC approval for the iPhone.

The letters for approval are dated March 8th, 2007, and first appeared on the FCC site today.
Go Here for some more documents from the FCC Site. When you get there, enter BCG for the Grantee Code and A1203 for the Product Code. Sorry about that.

After reading some of them, it looks like Apple requested that some of the specifications be kept confidential for 45 days. I guess that's one of the reasons we are only seeing this now. Also, the docs I referenced point to a grant date of 5/17/2007 (in the US standard of MM/DD/YYYY). I don't understand all the testing that was done, but it sure looks like there was a lot of it. Have fun reading.
__________________
"All that is not eternal, is eternally out-of-date" - C.S. Lewis

Last edited by SeanMcg : May 17, 2007 at 03:06 PM. Reason: Fix link
SeanMcg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:57 PM   #23
SeanMcg
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Arlington, VA, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpaceMagic View Post
Have you read the Confidentiality letter ? Tis funny Apple trying to cover their backs.
I'm sure that's common language for any new device. After all, it's not like they are keeping anything from the FCC with that request.
__________________
"All that is not eternal, is eternally out-of-date" - C.S. Lewis
SeanMcg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:57 PM   #24
notsofatjames
macrumors 6502a
 
notsofatjames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wales, UK
Send a message via MSN to notsofatjames Send a message via Yahoo to notsofatjames
Quote:
Originally Posted by Digital Skunk View Post
I am partial towards May 17th. I just think it works better when you know what month it is first, then the day. Call me a good ole American cowboy.
either way, but using a word instead of number will keep my happy!

I wish i could even try to understand the documents in the disclosure...i feel so dull...
__________________
Search before you post: MRoogle
notsofatjames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2007, 02:58 PM   #25
LxTxNx
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeanMcg View Post
Here are some more documents from the FCC Site.

After reading some of them, it looks like Apple requested that some of the specifications be kept confidential for 45 days. I guess that's one of the reasons we are only seeing this now. Also, the docs I referenced point to a grant date of 5/17/2007 (in the US standard of MM/DD/YYYY). I don't understand all the testing that was done, but it sure looks like there was a lot of it. Have fun reading.

BAD LINK



this is what I get when I click...


"The Following Error(s) Occurred While Retrieving The Requested Page:


Date and time of error: Thu May 17 14:57:22 EDT 2007
Requester's address: 170.35.208.21
Requester's browser type: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
Called from: http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=305389
Parameters specified: RequestTimeout=500
Diagnostic information: Element TCB_CODE is undefined in FORM.
The error occurred on line 6.


Please report this error to FCC OET Systems Support "
LxTxNx is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:11 AM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC