Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Aug 21, 2007, 02:15 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Samsung Announces 160GB 1.8



Samsung has announced a 160GB 1.8" Hard Drive that would be suitable for use in devices such as Apple's iPod.
Quote:
The 1.8” HDD has gained momentum from the mobile consumer markets as the storage medium of choice by providing high volume solutions at the most economical price points. Devices such as MP3 players and personal media players are using the 1.8” HDD as the storage medium to support music files, video and Internet access.
Apple's iPod is overdue for an update, with the last update almost a year ago. The high end iPod currently tops out at 80GB. Both Toshiba and Samsung have made steady advances in these micro hard drives over the past year, but Apple has not yet taken advantage of these higher capacities.

Apple is widely expected to release new iPods in the coming months. The most recent circulating rumors point to fullsize touchscreen (iPhone-like) iPod to replace the high end iPod.

Article Link

Last edited by arn : Aug 21, 2007 at 09:02 AM.
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 02:19 AM   #2
DaftUnion
macrumors 6502a
 
DaftUnion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Send a message via AIM to DaftUnion
I would love to see them use a 160gb hard drive on the iPod. I could finally fit my entire music collection and a good amount of photos and videos.
__________________
iMac G5 Rev. B/20"/2Ghz/SuperDrive/1GB RAM/400GB HD/Mac OS X.4.11
Switched 8/25/05
Custom 2.4Ghz Core2Duo/1GB Ram/NVIDIA 7600
iPhone 8gb
DaftUnion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 02:26 AM   #3
yoda13
macrumors 65816
 
yoda13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Texas
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaftUnion View Post
I would love to see them use a 160gb hard drive on the iPod. I could finally fit my entire music collection and a good amount of photos and videos.
I agree, the more the merrier...I might finally be able to take as many of my movies along with me as I want...
__________________
For over a thousand generations, the Jedi Knights were the guardians of peace and justice in the Old Republic. Before the dark times, before the Empire.
yoda13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 02:29 AM   #4
thejadedmonkey
macrumors 68040
 
thejadedmonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pa
Send a message via AIM to thejadedmonkey
Apple really needs to update, there was a time when the iPod music player was a leader in storage space with a whopping 5 gigs of space. That left all other mp3 players in the dust (especially with battery life!), and it's about time Apple reclaimed the throne.
__________________
Mac Mini G4 • MacBook Pro • iPod Nano
"Good judgement comes from experience,
experience comes from bad judgement.
- Mark Twain
thejadedmonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 02:30 AM   #5
BWhaler
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
After buying an iPhone, I wasn't sure why I would buy an iPod again.

But with a 160 gigs, and if Apple can push battery life for video over 10 hours with a bigger screen (wishing now...) I will be the first in line...
__________________
"Faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death." -- Hunter Thompson
BWhaler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 02:32 AM   #6
Zwhaler
macrumors 68040
 
Zwhaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Now THAT is something I would be interested in. I could put entire seasons of all my TV shows on it.
Zwhaler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 02:33 AM   #7
DoFoT9
macrumors 601
 
DoFoT9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NSW, Australia
Send a message via MSN to DoFoT9 Send a message via Skype™ to DoFoT9
what are the consumption ratings for this thing? they should be exactly the same as the smaller drives shouldn't they? this is an awsome advance in technology!! soon we can have those puppies in lappy HDD's
__________________
MBP CD2.16ghz, 500gb, 2GB Ram, X1600 OC'd, 19"
iMac24" 2.8ghz 750gb 4gbram
Hackintosh E4600 3GHz 10.5.4 8500GT
MozyMac
DoFoT9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 02:53 AM   #8
PumaGuy
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Québécois land! :)
160GB sounds nice and all, but what would be the price tag on it?
PumaGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 02:59 AM   #9
bigandy
macrumors Demi-God
 
bigandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Soho, London
nice. but i bet it won't be included in the iPod until the next generation (7G), just like there isn't a 120Gb at the mo, which we'll probably see at the next (6G) update methinks.
__________________
"any day that involves cat pee is a really bad day" - iBlue
bigandy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 03:00 AM   #10
-kritter-
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Idaho
Send a message via MSN to -kritter-
hmmm this is a good thing, but i personally hope that the 6G iPod uses flash, im extremely picky with my music and 16GB of flash would be totally adequate for me, i would rather have more battery life than a huge HDD that i would probably never fill up...and i would also like a slimmer more durable ipod, and a harddrive just wouldnt allow apple to fulfill those things...
__________________
MacBook CD 1.83GHz
24" 2.4GHz iMac
MySpace
-kritter- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 03:02 AM   #11
TuffLuffJimmy
macrumors 601
 
TuffLuffJimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Quote:
Originally Posted by -kritter- View Post
hmmm this is a good thing, but i personally hope that the 6G iPod uses flash, im extremely picky with my music and 16GB of flash would be totally adequate for me, i would rather have more battery life than a huge HDD that i would probably never fill up...and i would also like a slimmer more durable ipod, and a harddrive just wouldnt allow apple to fulfill those things...
then get the next nano... It will most likely have 16GB of space. For the rest of us we want an external hard drive for movie collections and back ups.
__________________
"Next PM I get from you about this, and it gets posted as my signature." --*LTD*
TuffLuffJimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 03:02 AM   #12
Multimedia
Banned
 
Multimedia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Santa Cruz CA, Silicon Beach
Send a message via AIM to Multimedia Send a message via Yahoo to Multimedia Send a message via Skype™ to Multimedia
Put 'em In AVC-Intra HD Camcorders ASAP Please

Next Gen AVC-Intra 3CCD HD Video Camcorders need this ASAP.
Multimedia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 03:03 AM   #13
J@ffa
macrumors 6502a
 
J@ffa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Behind you!
Is anyone else getting impatient with this iPod waiting lark? I'm ready to order the top of the line one, be it 80GB or 160GB, as soon as it comes out but I'm just hoping that's early next month at the latest.

I really hope they come out with a new form factor, though. If it's a 6G iPod with a bigger hard drive and an OS X-type OS, I doubt I'll go for it, and even your man-on-the-street prospective iPod purchaser is going to either consciously or otherwise dismiss them. People want the next big thing, and a proper iPod video with some cool bits and pieces on it is going to be popular. Having said that, even though the video capability of the current iPods is t3h suckag3, loads of people I know are perfectly happy with it and use it all the time. Although, Apple has a knack for figuring out what people want before they realise it themselves... but if they want those Christmas sales they'd better hurry up! :P
J@ffa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 03:09 AM   #14
-kritter-
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Idaho
Send a message via MSN to -kritter-
Quote:
Originally Posted by tuffluffjimmy View Post
then get the next nano... It will most likely have 16GB of space. For the rest of us we want an external hard drive for movie collections and back ups.

omg no way, the next gen nano will have 16GB of nand flash... all i want is the feel of a full sized ipod without the feeling if i once drop this, the harddrive could be toast. im also remembering some rumors awhile back of apple going all flash in the near future.... please dont rain on my parade
__________________
MacBook CD 1.83GHz
24" 2.4GHz iMac
MySpace
-kritter- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 03:24 AM   #15
maxjg
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Let's do some math, shall we?

160GB HDD + Full Touch Screen = THE BEST IPOD EVER.

I've got money in hand. Just announce the damn thing Apple!
maxjg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 03:38 AM   #16
Don Bagles
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
I think that having 160GB of storage in the next gen iPod would draw a clear line between it and the iPhone. It would enable apple to release an iPhone minus the Phone, without them looking too similar.

8GB vs 160GB = two very different products. One is a media player, the other is a communication device.

They'd need to also give the iPod some video features that the iPhone doesn't have. Higher resolution or something... to help draw the line between the two.

However, remember those leaked videos of the interface of the next gen iPod? It's not fullscreen/touchscreen! So i'm depressed. They're gonna make a minor update to the current iPod, and put a larger hard drive in.

Last edited by Don Bagles : Aug 21, 2007 at 03:47 AM.
Don Bagles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 04:18 AM   #17
nlivo
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ballarat, Australia
the next iPod will be 120GB and then they will make a minor update to that in january and clock it up to 160GB which is what we are seeing now. i am so sick of the current iPod's...THEY SUCK!! hurry up apple!!!
nlivo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 04:20 AM   #18
MacFly123
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Here they are :)

Here is the new line up
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	NewiPods.jpg
Views:	200
Size:	179.3 KB
ID:	82954  
__________________
- Steve Jobs' best friend!
MacFly123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 04:30 AM   #19
DoFoT9
macrumors 601
 
DoFoT9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NSW, Australia
Send a message via MSN to DoFoT9 Send a message via Skype™ to DoFoT9
^^ sorry but i cant see that happening.... too, square
__________________
MBP CD2.16ghz, 500gb, 2GB Ram, X1600 OC'd, 19"
iMac24" 2.8ghz 750gb 4gbram
Hackintosh E4600 3GHz 10.5.4 8500GT
MozyMac
DoFoT9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 04:32 AM   #20
knelto
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Bagles View Post
However, remember those leaked videos of the interface of the next gen iPod? It's not fullscreen/touchscreen! So i'm depressed. They're gonna make a minor update to the current iPod, and put a larger hard drive in.
Something just hit me.

I think the 6G HAS to be a widescreen/touchscreen and large capacity. Why?

Remember how people were somewhat let down with the 5.5G iPod, being that it only got a slight bump? My guess is that Apple has had the iPhone iPod all along, but couldn't release it because the iPhone wasn't out yet. If they released it last year, then everyone would be clamoring about the touch interface and widescreen in the iPod rather than in the iPhone. Once the iPhone was released people were thinking "Damn, what if they released an iPod like that!" Sure, the iPod would've sold amazingly if they released it a year ago, but I think it would've made the iPhone look a little less attractive. In releasing it the way they did, they built massive hype for the iPhone and will appease everyone who wants the large capacity, phone/internet-less iPod.
__________________
16GB iPhone 3G
24" iMac 2.8 GHz Core 2 Extreme
knelto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 04:48 AM   #21
Analog Kid
macrumors 68000
 
Analog Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by knelto View Post
Something just hit me.

I think the 6G HAS to be a widescreen/touchscreen and large capacity. Why?

Remember how people were somewhat let down with the 5.5G iPod, being that it only got a slight bump? My guess is that Apple has had the iPhone iPod all along, but couldn't release it because the iPhone wasn't out yet. If they released it last year, then everyone would be clamoring about the touch interface and widescreen in the iPod rather than in the iPhone. Once the iPhone was released people were thinking "Damn, what if they released an iPod like that!" Sure, the iPod would've sold amazingly if they released it a year ago, but I think it would've made the iPhone look a little less attractive. In releasing it the way they did, they built massive hype for the iPhone and will appease everyone who wants the large capacity, phone/internet-less iPod.
I think I agree with this, but it does beg the question: what about Europe/Asia? Will they get their fancy new iPod before the iPhone hits their markets?

I fear people are right that the 160s won't hit until a minor bump down the line... It would certainly be a bummer though. My 60GB is chock full, and I'm sure I could fill 120GB without much thought.
__________________
"Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand...
Ignorance and Prejudice and Fear walk hand-in-hand."
--Peart
Analog Kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 04:50 AM   #22
Vinnie_vw
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: the Netherlands
@ knelto: please let it hit you again. The iPhone is not even out yet in other countries and you expect Apple to undercut the market already?

In any case, I think 160 GB would only be nice for a small sub-set of the market: those that have insanely large collections, probably illegally acquired, and those that are really looking for a jukebox to keep at home / take with them.

For the movie-argument, I'd also like to stress that there is no movies on non-US iTunes yet. That said, if they introduced super-HD movies + a large-capacity iPod, that would probably do really well.
Vinnie_vw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 04:56 AM   #23
beer.coffee
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Bagles View Post
8GB vs 160GB = two very different products. One is a media player, the other is a communication device.

They'd need to also give the iPod some video features that the iPhone doesn't have. Higher resolution or something... to help draw the line between the two.
But remember that quote on the iPhone commercial...."Our best iPod yet" or something along that line. My bet is that they are trying to rack up as many iPhone sales as they can before the release of the widescreen iPod. And considering uk/europe doesnt have the iPhone yet i can see it being put back.

Some would say that they are completely different devices, but if you give the iPod a gorgeous widescreen and touch display with coverflow then you basically have the entire looks and functionality of an iPhone. The only real thing that the iPhone would have over it is telephone and email, and the other added extra's from a typical consumer point of view aren't that essential, especially when you look at the price of the phone and the plans. And to further flog the dead horse you would have 112Gb's less of storage compared to the new iPod. So i think that Apple are going to want to get as many people on the fixed telecommunication plans (which is half the profit) before they release a reasonably similar alternative.


Though if you look at if from the other angle, the full size iPod line is getting rather stale and Apple arent making as many sales as they could (decreased iPod sales expectations for last quarter). But then again, is there any need introduce that new and revolutionary widescreen iPod if Apple are still by far the leader in regards to portable music? Nothing is going to knock them off in the near future, so is there much point in releasing the iPod now? It would affect iPhone sales, a new line of products that its trying to promote and get out into the public as much as they can.


Well thats my prediction. I hope to death that i am wrong though. I've been iPodless for around 6 months now and would really love the widescreen, though i'll still probably end up getting whatever they release next, i need music! For my student sized bank account, the iPhone will be a little too expensive when it comes out here in Australia. The price of the phone itself is fine, though the price of the plans are a killer. Might get it as a graduation present for myself....

Last edited by beer.coffee : Aug 21, 2007 at 05:05 AM. Reason: a few additions.
beer.coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 05:18 AM   #24
Loge
macrumors 68000
 
Loge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: England
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinnie_vw View Post
those that have insanely large collections, probably illegally acquired
Stop talking like Steve Ballmer. There are plenty of reasons why someone might have a large collection legally acquired. CDs have beeen around 25 years; some people like lossless encoding etc etc.
Loge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2007, 05:18 AM   #25
bj3949
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Isn't 1.8 Inches Pretty Thick??
bj3949 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC