Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Sep 18, 2007, 01:57 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Intel On Track To Deliver Penryn, Nehalem



Today at the Intel Developer Forum, Intel CEO Paul Otellini affirmed that Intel's Penryn and Nehalem family of processors are on track for their releases this year and next year, respectively.

Quote:
"We expect our Penryn processors to provide up to a 20 percent performance increase while improving energy efficiency," said Otellini. "Intel's breakthrough 45nm silicon process technology allows us to provide low-cost, extremely low-power processors for innovative small form factor devices while delivering high-performance, multi-core, multi-featured processors used in the most advanced systems."
Penryn will start shipping in November of this year, and it is expected that Apple will use the variants in its products.

Meanwhile, Otellini also previewed Intel's upcoming new Nehalem architecture.

Quote:
"Nehalem is an entirely new architecture that leverages Intel's Core Microarchitecture, bringing leading-edge performance advantages, power efficiency and important new server features to market just a year after Intel leads the industry to 45nm technology," said Otellini.
One of Nehalem's advancements will be the use of the QuickPath Interconnect system architecture, which includes an integrated memory controller and improved communication links between system components to significantly improve overall system performance. An advanced version of hyperthreading will also make a comeback in Nehalem.

While Nehalem will begin on 45nm technology in late-summer 2008, Intel plans to quickly move to 32nm production in 2009. DailyTech notes that Mac OS X successfully boots on Nehalem.

Article Link

Last edited by Blue Velvet : Sep 18, 2007 at 05:30 PM.
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 02:02 PM   #2
morespce54
macrumors 6502a
 
morespce54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Around the World
all sounds really good...
__________________
..:.::.:.:.::..:.: Oh, I get it. It's very clever :.:.::.:.:.::.:..:.::..:.::.:..:.::.:.::.:.::..
DO NOT OPERATE YOUR COMPUTER UNDER THE INFLUENCE!
morespce54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 02:03 PM   #3
princealfie
macrumors 68020
 
princealfie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Salt Lake City UT
Send a message via Yahoo to princealfie
thanks for the update!
princealfie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 02:03 PM   #4
theheyes
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Manchester
One step closer to my iMac Quad.
__________________
I fold for Team 10. Do you?
theheyes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 02:05 PM   #5
Naimfan
macrumors 65816
 
Naimfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bliss....
32nM?!?! All I can say is "Wow!" That is amazing.

B
__________________
"I find the great thing in this world is not so much where we stand, as in what direction we are moving."
Oliver Wendell Holmes
Naimfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 02:06 PM   #6
fanbrain
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: So. UT
I can't wait to see what these are going in. I'm in the market for a dual 2.0 G5. New machines can't come sooner!
__________________
Keeping Apple debt-free since 1983.
fanbrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 02:08 PM   #7
Eidorian
macrumors G3
 
Eidorian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Indiana
Send a message via AIM to Eidorian
I wonder how the QuickPath Interconnect will effect motherboard compatibility.
__________________
MRoogle it!
hikari T7500 2.2 GHz / 4 GB / 320 GB / GMA X3100 / 10.5.8
chobimaru Core i5 750 2.66 GHz / 4 GB / 640 GB / 4830 / Windows 7
Eidorian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 02:11 PM   #8
babyjenniferLB
macrumors 65816
 
babyjenniferLB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Scotlands
oh god not hyperthreading again, tried and faild technology
__________________
Kittenbunny CMS developer Temp Project link
babyjenniferLB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 02:13 PM   #9
thepandamancan
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Burbank, CA
would these find its way into macbook pros by the end of the year? would it be worth it to wait or buy a macbook pro now?
__________________
Panda
5G iPod, 24" iMac (white), 8GB iPhone, Penryn 15.4" 2.5Ghz MacBook Pro, Apple TV (160GB), Canon Rebel XTi
thepandamancan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 02:15 PM   #10
bigjohn
macrumors Demi-God
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Arcadia, CA
1 step closer to 1nm
__________________
Big John
iPhone3Gs, 4 iPods, Mac Pro (2x2.26 Nehalem), old Macbook Pro, Mini, iBook G3, Power Mac 7100/66, Apple IIe
bigjohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 02:17 PM   #11
Clive At Five
macrumors 65816
 
Clive At Five's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: St. Paul, MN
32nm is pretty amazing. Think about it... it's less than a tenth of the length of the shortest wavelength of visible light... So basically, humans are producing objects well beyond our ability of sight.

Someone should take an electron microscope to these 32nm grooves... I'd like to see them close-up.

-Clive
__________________
My Mod: G4 Cube + Atom 330 CPU + Wiimote = Ultimate HTPC!
Clive At Five is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 02:18 PM   #12
MikeTheC
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gallifrey -- Capitol City, Prydonian Sector
I'm hoping they've learned their P4 lesson and got it right this time.

Arguably, the Centrino and Core Duo/Core2Duo CPUs have been truly excellent architectures, so clearly someone at Intel is getting it right. I just hope the new ones are being architected by the same crew.

Time will tell; it always does. -- The Seventh Doctor
MikeTheC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 02:22 PM   #13
0racle
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North Carolina
Send a message via ICQ to 0racle
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeTheC View Post
Arguably, the Centrino and Core Duo/Core2Duo CPUsr
Nitpicking, but Centrino isn't a processor.
0racle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 02:25 PM   #14
Eidorian
macrumors G3
 
Eidorian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Indiana
Send a message via AIM to Eidorian
Centrino = Core 2 Duo (Merom) + GM/PM965 + Intel Wireless

Hopefully hyperthreading is a bit more intelligent this time around.
__________________
MRoogle it!
hikari T7500 2.2 GHz / 4 GB / 320 GB / GMA X3100 / 10.5.8
chobimaru Core i5 750 2.66 GHz / 4 GB / 640 GB / 4830 / Windows 7
Eidorian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 02:30 PM   #15
CHROMEDOME
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bay Area/LA
Send a message via AIM to CHROMEDOME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eidorian View Post
Centrino = Core 2 Duo (Merom) + GM/PM965 + Intel Wireless

Hopefully hyperthreading is a bit more intelligent this time around.
Centrino is nothing more than a marketing scheme. It just means intel stuff inside a laptop.
__________________
Whitebook 2.0ghz CD 2gb
Rev A iMac G5
coming soon...Sony VX2000
CHROMEDOME is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 02:44 PM   #16
cube
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: May 2004
Meanwhile AMD improves the mainstream segment by announcing tri-core processors.
cube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 02:46 PM   #17
masse
macrumors 6502a
 
masse's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: MA/GA
Still waiting...
__________________
MBP 2.53ghz 4GB ram | 32GB 2G ipod touch |1.33ghz PB G4 15" | Ipod Nano 1G 4gb
masse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 02:50 PM   #18
MikeTheC
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gallifrey -- Capitol City, Prydonian Sector
Quote:
Originally Posted by CHROMEDOME View Post
Centrino is nothing more than a marketing scheme. It just means intel stuff inside a laptop.
Yes, I understand that. I was simply being general in that statement, since there are also various revisions in play on that platform, and I wasn't trying to get dragged down into pointless detail.

Nevertheless, I'm still hoping for the best.

And as far as AMD goes, well... they backed a losing horse in their processor road map, and Intel skunked them. It's too bad, really, but while AMD may be down, they're certainly not out, which is a good thing because it promotes competition, and that's a healthy thing for the x86-using Mac platform out there.
MikeTheC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 02:56 PM   #19
SMM
macrumors 65816
 
SMM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tiger Mountain - WA State
So, how do three people find this negative?
__________________
The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all the people. - Noam Chomsky
SMM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 02:59 PM   #20
psychofreak
Retired
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: London
I'm getting excited...its not like I'm going to buy a desktop, but trying new computers in the Apple Store is just my cup of tea
psychofreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 02:59 PM   #21
cube
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: May 2004
But now AMD is not against MCM anymore and is ready for octo-core Montreal in 2008, based on Shanghai.
cube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 03:04 PM   #22
k2k koos
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Somewhere between yesterday and tomorrow
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clive At Five View Post
32nm is pretty amazing. Think about it... it's less than a tenth of the length of the shortest wavelength of visible light... So basically, humans are producing objects well beyond our ability of sight.

Someone should take an electron microscope to these 32nm grooves... I'd like to see them close-up.

-Clive
That is indeed very impressive, and I would love to see one of these through an electron microscope, marvels of technology.
__________________
The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources.
k2k koos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 03:12 PM   #23
ruutiveijari
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hellsinki
It's quite amazing how fast these processors are these days. Just imagine 10, 15 years in to the future.
ruutiveijari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 03:15 PM   #24
smivvy
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
So...

Do I wait for these new processors or do I buy my new mac pro now?

Bearing in mind my current 4yr old G4 has died a sudden death!
smivvy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 18, 2007, 03:15 PM   #25
CJD2112
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Damn, so now my Mac Pro 2.66 will be even MORE obsolete lol...

Sucks I couldn't just drop one of those new chipsets into my Mac Pro like the quad core processors and get an upgrade. Pretty cool stuff, just hoping Intel makes actual use of hyperthreading. I remember when I had a P4 3.0 GHrtz Intel Hyper-thread chip and I thought it was the coolest thing lol. The power of marketing...
CJD2112 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:44 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC