My wrists are almost exactly the same size as yours and I am going with the 42. For some reason to my eyes the 38mm makes my wrist look even smaller than it already is and I like the bigger look anyway.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
38mm vs 42mm: side by side comparison on wrist
- Thread starter NauticalDan
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Yeah, I usually think of it in terms of 36-39mm. The point was the size of it relative to Daniel Craig's wrist.
1. Thanks a lot for posting this. I would have done something similar myself, but I'm out of printer ink.
2. I guess I'm in the minority here, but this definitely confirms my preference for the 38mm watch. It looks perfect to me. I've always HATED big watches. I don't care how fashionable they are, they look tacky. And considering it's a smartwatch, the larger it is, the dorkier it looks, in my opinion. At this point with these not being widely adopted, I think I'd rather wear something more subtle that didn't stand out ("HEY, I'M WEARING A SMARTWATCH!").
3. People keep mentioning the larger screen being a benefit, but I hardly think 4mm is gonna make things any easier to see. Besides, if that's an issue for anyone, the font size can be adjusted in settings.
I'm in the same boat as you. I don't want to waste my ink! I found this website and posted it in another thread. You can choose your wrist size and see what each would look like. Definitely swayed me to the 38!
http://www.bigapplewatch.com/diameter.asp?wristsize=725&Diameter=38&Go=Go
Yes. This is probably the main reason I'll not get an Apple Watch. After all, Tim Cook is selling it as a fashion item just as equally as a device, so it's not far fetched.
Lol. I would think if your clothing, shoes, haircut, etc are not dorky, then a watch isn't going to suddenly make you look dorky.
My wrists are 160,5mm, so it's like the point where 38mm ends to fit and 42 beggins. What to choose then?
I think with your wrist size you could fit into either but the 38mm would look like more of a "watch" than a "smartwatch". The 42mm is sized to fit people up to 205mm. While it would work, it's gonna look big on you. The OP wrists are bigger than 170mm unless there's some photo magic throwing me off
I've just printed samples of both and I think I'll go with 42mm since my wrist are only 160mm, but my hands are quite big, so it still may look well.
Get the 38mm. Keep in mind that the actual apple watch is pretty thick and if you get the 42mm version it will look really weird on your 17cm wrist especially is you're gonna wear a shirt. Here's a big watch on a medium sized wrist. It looks so tasteless, imo.
![bd6955eea1c0c148838ab942177e4430.jpg]()
I have similar wrist size (18cm) and i always wear 36-40mm watches. I have some that are 42-45mm, but they look weird on me if i wear something other than a short sleeved tshirt.
I have similar wrist size (18cm) and i always wear 36-40mm watches. I have some that are 42-45mm, but they look weird on me if i wear something other than a short sleeved tshirt.
Now this is a GREAT LINK! Thank for sharing! This confirms 42mm for me
----------
I have huge hands too! So the 42" will not look out of place on us
38mm vs 42mm: side by side comparison on wrist
I am 37 this month, my wrist is about 7" (177mm) and I currently own 2 Burberry watches (40 and 44mm) and an Omega Speedmaster (42mm) and all 3 look good on my wrist, but the 42 is the perfect size. Granted all of those are circle faces, but I can't see myself getting a 38", especially when looking at the straps.
I am 37 this month, my wrist is about 7" (177mm) and I currently own 2 Burberry watches (40 and 44mm) and an Omega Speedmaster (42mm) and all 3 look good on my wrist, but the 42 is the perfect size. Granted all of those are circle faces, but I can't see myself getting a 38", especially when looking at the straps.
I'm 35 years old and according to that site i have wrists of a teen
I apparently have the wrists of a pre-teen? 15cm isn't even on their chart.
The length of the straps are an important factor too!
Like a couple of other people here, I had been of the opinion that the larger watch might tend to look a tad dorky if it looks a bit oversized for the wrist of the person wearing it. I thought I had unusually small dainty wrists for someone of my build and height, but apparently not: I've just measured and they're about 180mm. I was going to get the 38mm, but according to the sizing guide on Apple's website, the strap I want, the milanese loop, is only available in the small size, which fits wrists "up to 180mm", which could be a bit too small. The milanese loop for the 42mm is available in longer lengths.
I've also compared the "actual size" images in the Apple Store app and to my surprise even the 42mm is considerably smaller than my current watch which suits my wrist. So appearances can be deceptive. I've decided to go for the 42mm after all.
I think both sizes look good on the OP, but the 42mm looks a bit better suited.
Like a couple of other people here, I had been of the opinion that the larger watch might tend to look a tad dorky if it looks a bit oversized for the wrist of the person wearing it. I thought I had unusually small dainty wrists for someone of my build and height, but apparently not: I've just measured and they're about 180mm. I was going to get the 38mm, but according to the sizing guide on Apple's website, the strap I want, the milanese loop, is only available in the small size, which fits wrists "up to 180mm", which could be a bit too small. The milanese loop for the 42mm is available in longer lengths.
I've also compared the "actual size" images in the Apple Store app and to my surprise even the 42mm is considerably smaller than my current watch which suits my wrist. So appearances can be deceptive. I've decided to go for the 42mm after all.
I think both sizes look good on the OP, but the 42mm looks a bit better suited.
http://forums.watchuseek.com/f71/whats-your-wrist-size-help-destroy-tiny-huge-myth-624165.html
I used to think my 170mm wrists were "skinny" but apparently I'm right in the middle of the pack according to this survey.
----------
I'm actually wondering a bit about Apple's recommended sizes for their bands, especially the Milanese Loop. One thing we don't know is, perhaps the reason they have such a narrow range for acceptable sizes for the Milanese Loop is because that magnetic fastener really only looks good in a narrow range of positions on the back of the watch wearer's hand.
So in fact, the "up to 180mm" band might fit people up to say, 200mm but they felt aesthetically you wouldn't want to have the fastener so at the 60 degree position on your wrist.
We'll all know by April 10th, of course!
I used to think my 170mm wrists were "skinny" but apparently I'm right in the middle of the pack according to this survey.
----------
I'm actually wondering a bit about Apple's recommended sizes for their bands, especially the Milanese Loop. One thing we don't know is, perhaps the reason they have such a narrow range for acceptable sizes for the Milanese Loop is because that magnetic fastener really only looks good in a narrow range of positions on the back of the watch wearer's hand.
So in fact, the "up to 180mm" band might fit people up to say, 200mm but they felt aesthetically you wouldn't want to have the fastener so at the 60 degree position on your wrist.
We'll all know by April 10th, of course!