didnt even know iTunes U existed, is that another PING.
Text books? There doesn't appear to be much text at all. They look more like PICTURE books to me. You know, those things you use to keep very young children interested in a story during the time when their attention spans and cognitive abilities are still unable to handle serious tasks.
Science and math are all about visualization and imagination.
They never mentioned how kids are supposed to afford these iPads and books. Even if they can afford it, iPad theft becomes an issue. You really trust little Timmy to not lose (or steal) a $400 Angry Birds machine? College, yes. Pre-college, not logical.
People still read books...?
Joy!
You still need to pay £395 for the iPad.
He really is, looks far fitter and isn't pouring with sweat onstage. Thought he delivered a very clear keynote.
sorry, but you are an idiot. Science and math are all about visualization and imagination. Doing things like walking through thought experiments. It's been proven over and over again that previously conventional methods of presenting physics and math to a very poor job of teaching students so that they understand, really understand fundamental concepts. Just reading is not the best way or working through text problems. My nephew who is very bright has dyslexia and a conventional book packed dense with text is a real barrier for him. To have $15 or less for multimedia books that can be kept dynamically up to date is phenomenal.
Sure as always a small percentage will excel regardless of the methods, and already learn by conventional means, but in a world in which science and technology become increasingly relevant to to even high school graduates and also the political support of research by the general public is more and more of an issue, it becomes all the more critical to bring everyone along and get them at least a real understanding of basic concepts and methods of science. With the likely future state of the economy, we just can't afford the current rampant scientific illiteracy.
You still need to pay £395 for the iPad.
apple corp. want educate the children with its version of history, science, religion ect. through these "interactive books". Social Lobotomy.
Did you watch something different than the rest of us? They introduced authoring, publishing and distribution tools today; they did not announce any of their own books. In fact there is no original content outside of tutorials for Apple products available from Apple in iTunes or iBooks. So I do not know where you came to the conclusion that Apple has any particular point of view on history, science or religion they want to put in children's heads.
I think it's better to say it's a bad idea for high school students. I can see a market for this type of thing in private prep schools, where cost issues would probably be a non-issue, but for public schools?Can't believe some of you who think this is a bad idea.
...
What nonsense. You have to carry a few books around at Uni, so what? Did this really need 'fixing'? I didn't pass all the time ago through moaning about a heavy bag, students just get on with it. And most of the time you're in a library anyway, tucked away with your own stash of books. I can have as many books as I want open, and just used some PostIt's to keep important pages. You own a book;
- It doesn't live off a battery.
- You drop it, it doesn't smash.
- You buy the books you need without a base cost just to 'read' them.
- Re-sell value.
- Using 'real' books would develop better cognitive skills than learning how to use an iPad.
Call it sentimental value, but I can't see myself warming to a virtual 'textbook' in my iBook shelf, which is basically a piece of a software anyway. Many of the texts I bought for University are beautiful things, and I pride having them sit on my shelf, ready to flick through. They may not be 'interactive', but isn't that what an imagination is for?
....
The Powerbook G5.
Next time. I'm sure of it.
Like everything Apple they dole out versions that only keep you waiting for the next improved one. A good start though. Why not have more Flash type interactive buttons a timeline and actions via an HTML5 interface? Designers really miss this about Flash which would be a great book development platform if it didn't suck for speed-so if Apple made a similar software but with speed and interactivity instead of this basic software, books could be SO much better than even this-now waiting for version 2.
I think it's better to say it's a bad idea for high school students. I can see a market for this type of thing in private prep schools, where cost issues would probably be a non-issue, but for public schools?
At least in the United States, I don't see a lot of parents being happy/willing that even a heavily discounted, education only iPad is a required purchase for their 14 year old. School districts would certainly not be enthusiastic about having to spend ever-dwindling public funds to issue every student an iPad either. And, admittedly I haven't been in high school in over a decade, but for subjects like math and English, those textbooks remain relevant educational tools for years as long as they're in decent condition. I mean, my calculus book was probably 30 years old and I still managed to learn calculus just fine.
By college, it's a non-issue. The students are older, more responsible and out-of-pocket expense is expected. I just don't see major publishers willing to jump on board and ditch a market that essentially prints money for them. Also, just given the generally left-of-center views on a lot of college campuses, I can see some professors opting to continue self-published required texts via the local print shop to keep the student revenue local instead of out to Cupertino.
What you're forgetting is that people/schools currently purchase the text books, which are very costly. In grad school, some of my books cost up to $250 each.