Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Watch 2 Rumored to Include Cellular Connectivity Amid Push for iPhone Independency
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
They have these things that came out, oh, about 14 years ago called a bluetooth ear peice. Pretty amazing, connects through wireless to your device. You should look into it.
So you would be willing to pay for two cellular connections? iPhone + Apple Watch?
Just for those few times you could run out without the phone?
If it can't fully replace my smartphone why do I need LTE? The cost per year would be prohibitive.
Reeeaaaalllllyyyyyy and tell me, just WHEN did you last see people walking around wearing bluetooth headsets then? I think taxi drivers use them so I'll give you that, are you a taxi driver?
Your solution is also stupid, you are saying why not use cellular on your tiny watch, then use bluetooth too to connect a headset to it at the same time! Wow, what's your target for battery life? An hour?
The Timex ironman one GPS+ watch came out roughly the same time as the Apple Watch. It sold for 499 before dropping to around $250. It came with a free AT&T data plan for a whole year. After the first year the data plan was $40 a year. I think you guys are jumping the gun worrying that it will be $5 or $10 a month. I'm hoping for a free T-Mobile plan. Also a watch wouldn't need LTE. They could go with HSPDA. It would need to connect to all 4 carriers though.
Ever since watch os 2 came out you could do more on an Apple Watch with its companion iPhone turned off and left for dead because of known wifi networks. Yet I still see posts that think once you are out of Bluetooth range you can't use your watch at all.
If the next version of iOS / watch os supported sms messaging with wifi calling that would improve the watch. I've already noticed that I no longer need my iPhone on and on range of the watch for dictation to work.
Ever since watch os 2 came out you could do more on an Apple Watch with its companion iPhone turned off and left for dead because of known wifi networks. Yet I still see posts that think once you are out of Bluetooth range you can't use your watch at all.
If the next version of iOS / watch os supported sms messaging with wifi calling that would improve the watch. I've already noticed that I no longer need my iPhone on and on range of the watch for dictation to work.
Last edited:
Is this not what you wrote in reply to irfuel's quote?Try reading my reply again.
No such presumption or knowledge is implied.
If no such knowledge of irfuel is presumed or implied, how can you know the current battery life is perfectly adequate for his/her needs?
Maybe you should ready your reply again as well. Just sayin'.
Yes, and I have several other square watches that do nothing but tell the time on analog watch faces, what's your point?
Maybe the carriers got this ready in advance?
http://www.cnet.com/news/t-mobile-and-sprint-to-allow-one-phone-number-for-multiple-devices/
I'd think that at any given moment the data I'd consume via my watch would mostly be data I wouldn't consume via my phone (and vice versa), so an increase in cumulative data usage would be marginal.
That, and would the Apple Watch consume that much data on its own anyway?
:: prepares to eat words in 4 years ::
People who complain that the Apple Watch needs cellular because wifi isnt everywhere and that you have to carry your iPhone with you are the same people that tell us not to buy cellular enabled iPads because they can always tether their iPhone and wifi is everywhere. It's a loop.
Well I have a Family plan, and if its like a tablet where it costs $10 extra a month, yeah sure.
You can argue that you want it to be round because you prefer round watches. You can't argue that it has to be round because it's a watch. Watch manufacturers have been making square watches as long as they've been making round watches.
I ballparked the amount at around $10 as well. Even more a reason for Verizon and AT&T to get more money from us.
GPS capability is far more important than cellular, don't know why this article suggests that cellular capability would enable GPS function, (I am quite aware that aGPS uses cell towers to aid triangulation, but you don't need cellular capability for accurate GPS... ask Garmin).
Also phone batteries die quicker in big cities, ever wonder why? Oh yeah, searching for cell signal when going in and out of subways or between tall buildings. This is what eats your battery so quickly. One way to really kill the watch would be to further cripple it's already questionable battery life by adding cellular capability.
If Apple truly are contemplating cellular as a priority function, they need their heads read...
Also phone batteries die quicker in big cities, ever wonder why? Oh yeah, searching for cell signal when going in and out of subways or between tall buildings. This is what eats your battery so quickly. One way to really kill the watch would be to further cripple it's already questionable battery life by adding cellular capability.
If Apple truly are contemplating cellular as a priority function, they need their heads read...
cellular connectivity will be reality and is a must for Apple watch and other wearables to become must have items. Battery life and processing power issues will be worked out in the next 1-3 years. There is a lot of tweaking that can happen to make cellular connectivity a working and livable reality. Apple watch is currently on 28nm for its S1 processor. Subsequent generations will get us down to 14nm then 10nm and possibly even 8nm. Die shrinks with improved cell, GPS radios, software, and battery designs will get us there.
I would never use a cellular connected watch as a primary tool for phone calls but it would be great life saver in certain situations where your phone battery is dead or your phone is not within reach. Think emergency situations. I would also like a waterproof Apple watch that I can go swimming or surfing with. It would be a dream come true if I could still get texts and other important info while out surfing at the beach or swimming in the pool. A cellular connected watch would also be great if you need to find your phone if it is outside of Bluetooth wifi range.
I would never use a cellular connected watch as a primary tool for phone calls but it would be great life saver in certain situations where your phone battery is dead or your phone is not within reach. Think emergency situations. I would also like a waterproof Apple watch that I can go swimming or surfing with. It would be a dream come true if I could still get texts and other important info while out surfing at the beach or swimming in the pool. A cellular connected watch would also be great if you need to find your phone if it is outside of Bluetooth wifi range.
Stunning for now. Though it may become "revolutionary" if Apple were to ever productize it.
Occasionally a company gets it right for their first version, but the
Watch really was a first gen device when it comes to performance/efficiency.
People who make such comments should be put on a master list, and never allowed to buy a round Apple Watch... even after they change their mind because Apple said it was now okay!
This is just like the "I don't know why anyone would buy an iPhone with a larger screen" ridiculousness. You'd think that people would learn from history after a while.
Yep, quite similar to the iPhone version. But rather than eating an iPod, the Watch version will eat your car keys.
Yep... 1.5 days means you still have to charge it every night... or else you have a dead watch by 1pm the next day.
You honestly need want a watch that can last 2.5 days to guarantee it will last 2 full days.
So you are basically asking Apple to double battery capacity... or to halve power consumption.
I'm not sure we're there yet!
Last edited:
Who is gonna pay monthly just to give their watch a cellular connection? That's barmy. They just need to make it connect to WiFi in a way which isn't horribly sketchy and prone to drop outs.
[doublepost=1461614898][/doublepost]
The irony in your comment. The Apple Watch should have been round from the get-go, Apple following the crowd has been the single biggest issue with the Apple Watch since the start.
[doublepost=1461614898][/doublepost]
The irony in your comment. The Apple Watch should have been round from the get-go, Apple following the crowd has been the single biggest issue with the Apple Watch since the start.
No, I was using your "too soon" characterization as many people proclaimed the original iPhone was a flop because of poor performance and features, and with that drew an analogy to the same thing I'm hearing about the Watch. That's not my view, though.
The Watch is an accessory, rather than a flagship product like the iPhone. However, both started off life lacking to some. Like the iPhone and the MacBook Air, the watch will similarly evolve as technology improves and becomes available. That's just the way Apple works.
The Watch may not be for you, but for many others, including myself, it has become indispensable.
It's kind of hard not to speak awkwardly into it though. I mean, you're talking to your wrist in public. It's going to attract attention, and if it's quiet enough, everyone will hear your phone call. Or, you'll be yelling at your wrist if it's too loud. I don't see how to make it not awkward
Making it not awkward; use a Bluetooth earpiece, or dress like a Secret Service Agent and talk to your shirt cuff.