Proven? When? Where?
Here's where paranoia hits you: When you don't look at reliable sources, but at unreliable websites who read these reliable sources, don't understand a bit of what they are reading, and as a result claim things that their source never claimed. And like this poster, when you make claims without turning the brain on and thinking about what you're saying first.
I'm not dismissing privacy concerns. Quite the contrary. There's a lot of evil stuff going on. What I dismiss is people who make up things and poison the discussion with paranoia. For example, idiotic claims of NSA backdoors. The NSA having a backdoor usually means game over for privacy. Nothing you can do. But that's not true, it's just paranoia. If you read the proper facts, you'll know that your privacy is endangered, and you can learn what to do about it.
----------
Silly me. I've been reading unreliable sources like
The Guardian, who are the ones that actually have the leaked documents related to NSA, and
Apple itself.
The post you replied to said
Yay! More opportunities for Apple to collect data about us.
And your reply was
Same old paranoid nonsense.
The M7 motion chip appears to collect more data on what a user is doing to provide a better experience. Which is a good thing, and I am actually looking forward to this feature for fitness and other uses that are hopefully under development.
The problem is, we just have to hope that Apple does not collect or store information from the iPhone 5S's new technology, such as the motion chip and the fingerprint sensor (yes, it will be encoded data and not the actual fingerprint — but if a phone can decode it, I don't think it's unreasonable to think that the government could figure out how to as well if this data were collected).
I don't like that I just have to hope tech companies and the government don't collect my information without my knowledge. Even taking Apple's statement I linked to above at face value, they admit to getting 4,000-5,000 requests from the US government in 6 months. "From time to time" they refuse to fulfill the requests. It's safe to say that most of the time then, they hand over user information to the government. And if it's an order from the (quasi-legal) FISA court, we aren't even given the right to know if any information has been collected or what type of information it is.
So until we do away with PRISM and similar programs, the FISA court, and tech companies' inability and/or unwillingness to protect user data, then it's not paranoid to be concerned when more information will be available for possible collection. Yes, as you say, people should be properly informed. I agree that everyone should do this. Posting things like "same old paranoid nonsense" does not encourage this, in my opinion.