Aesthetically. Parts wise - not that much different than other phones. Apple just had a larger profit margin.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple's Low-Cost iPhone Design Said to Be Mix of iPhone 5 and iPod Touch with iPod Classic Curves
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Aesthetically. Parts wise - not that much different than other phones. Apple just had a larger profit margin.
They could make more of a margin off these cheaper iPhones than the 4/4S. Part of the reason that their margins are compressing is because they are still selling a lot of older iPhones. With the heavy discounting they do it is most likely eating into the iPhone 5 sales. So why not try to get a cheaper to make iPhone out there to strengthen those margins.
Phil Schiller either never said that or it was redacted as the original article that claimed his quote changed their article and removed the quote entirely.
Last edited:
I see it happening if Apple wants to be able to compete in the low end market. Its for real.
still dont believe this stunt
they are more like describing the iphone5s to me
if this is done, then TIM ******** real bad - " we make only the best products
"
they are more like describing the iphone5s to me
if this is done, then TIM ******** real bad - " we make only the best products
"
I atually prefer this design to the current, I hope the rumors are true.
I feel the same way.
More than a decade. All Macs including laptops, were plastic initially.
----------
Ick! Wouldn't touch it.
My first choice would be a mini-tablet with phone capabilities, but I would consider a 4G enabled iPod touch if it was inexpensive enough. The loss of usability from having a tiny 4" display would be somewhat balanced by light weight and small form factor.
Wow. Comparing apples to oranges on that one.
And? If you've nothing else to say, then I can only assume the analogy, however flawed you think it is, works. But if it's that terrible, then compare phones. Android offers a lot of different entry points in terms of price. Apple can do the same and still maintain quality, so what's the problem?
I can see it happening, but a lower priced iPhone still wouldn't be a low end phone. More like mid-range smartphone.
Exactly, or perhaps $329 at 16 GB and no 8 GB model. The less expensive, not cheap iPhone will be a thicker, plastic iPod touch (sharing the same internals and display) with the addition of a phone. It will come in multicolors. My guess is the large Chinese carrier asked for it and made an upfront commitment and that is why we will see it.
The line up under contract will be:
iPhone 5S $199 (fingerprint technology, better camera, faster)
iPhone 5 $99
New iPhone $0
No 4S or 4, all iOS 7, Siri, LTE, and 4 inch displays.
Huge hits all.
Why are people so against plastic casing for phones? If it is a high grade of plastic what's the problem?
Iphone 3g was plastic and the most durable out of the iphones. You could drop it and not worry about it shattering
----------
Yes because people apple wouldnt dare allow those low income folks to enjoy ios devices. They are not good enough.
Iphone 3g was plastic and the most durable out of the iphones. You could drop it and not worry about it shattering
----------
Yes because people apple wouldnt dare allow those low income folks to enjoy ios devices. They are not good enough.
I want to see lower cost service so the the iPhone can dominate in the business world. Too often I see Android chosen because it does enough to get by and the cost per line is cheaper.
----------
I saw several damaged iPhone 3g's at my work. Most developed cracks around the charging port.
4's and 5's have been very durable so far.
----------
I saw several damaged iPhone 3g's at my work. Most developed cracks around the charging port.
4's and 5's have been very durable so far.
The plastic MacBook was $1000. At the time, everyone was calling for apple to make a $500 or $600 netbook, because everyone here thought that netbooks were the future of computer makers, and that Apple needed to jump on that bandwagon because supposedly the average consumer wasn't going to spend the money on a non-netbook.
Has everyone forgotten how hard it is for Apple to make the iPhone 5? All of the scratches and dents, and the extra labor that had to be hired for quality control? That not only caused supply issues for weeks, but likely contributed to a lower number of units sold as people looked towards other options.
Apple's most likely abandoning the iPhone 5 instead of moving it downmarket. They'll instead introduce the iPhone 5i:
- Same PCB as iPhone 5
- Maybe a TN screen instead of IPS
- Plastic enclosure (easier to produce)
- Colors
- $299 for 8GB in black (free on contract in the US)
- $299/black may even use an A5 instead of an A6, though 512 MB of RAM is really tight these days.
- $399 for 16GB in white ($99 on contract in the US)
They'll probably keep the original iPhone 5 tooling for the iPhone 5s and drop an A7 processor in there (Rogue graphics, maybe A15 cores or second generation Apple cores)
Apple's most likely abandoning the iPhone 5 instead of moving it downmarket. They'll instead introduce the iPhone 5i:
- Same PCB as iPhone 5
- Maybe a TN screen instead of IPS
- Plastic enclosure (easier to produce)
- Colors
- $299 for 8GB in black (free on contract in the US)
- $299/black may even use an A5 instead of an A6, though 512 MB of RAM is really tight these days.
- $399 for 16GB in white ($99 on contract in the US)
They'll probably keep the original iPhone 5 tooling for the iPhone 5s and drop an A7 processor in there (Rogue graphics, maybe A15 cores or second generation Apple cores)
Last edited:
iPod shuffle, nano, mini, ipad mini, ibook, small iMacs, basic MBA - most affordable products
I think the plastic back just give the impression of the phone is of less quality so that the existing Iphone line can charge premium price. Apple intention, I think, is not the low end of the smartphone where no-name brand smartphone manufacturing dominate today with $100-150 smartphone. I think the focus is on mid-price smartphone where Samsung dominate and make most money.
Apple will rework Iphone internal to use the current mass market level components to put together the phone. Gross margin will be compressed. Currently Iphone has gross margin of 50-60%. The mid-price one probably will be in the price range of 400-450 (may be) with a gross margin of 30%ish. Apple doesn't need to Android phone $ to $ and be competitive. Ipad mini showed that Apple can charge premium price within a category and still have a block buster device. A $400ish Iphone will generate enough demand to worth Apple's worth both in term of earning and market share increase..
Old design may actually cost more money to manufacturing. e.g. the wifi chip use in 3GS may not be available in the quantity of 70-80mm unit a year kind of rate anymore and Apple may have to pay up for supplier to bring back old equipment to produce them. Just think of buying a ribbon for a dot matrix printer today. It is very old technology but it will cost an arm and a leg to get one because very few suppliers produce them now. A mid-priced Iphone may generate 70-80M additional unit sales a year and the initial quarter may see a demand of 30M-40M unit or more. Apple will have to figure out how to get enough processor and LCD screen. It is going to be one hell of launch if Apple can figure out how to build a nice mid-priced phone that still have decent gm.
Last edited: