rickvanr said:Check it;
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0471711...9NTAwfGNvPTF8aHRtbD0xfG5tPTE_;fc=3;ft=22;fm=1
Looks legit. I believe I've read about it on a Futurama fan site as well.
That's cool...I need a Futurama fix.
rickvanr said:Check it;
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0471711...9NTAwfGNvPTF8aHRtbD0xfG5tPTE_;fc=3;ft=22;fm=1
Looks legit. I believe I've read about it on a Futurama fan site as well.
Not if all thousand people are stupid.grapes911 said:I can't find any reports of why this is, but this article explains why polling only 1000 people is fairly accurate on representing the view all of Americas (assuming the poll is done correctly).
OnceUGoMac said:Perhaps I mis-spoke.BBC is funded by licensed fees (how is this not a taxation) from when you buy a t.v. set. Who's responsible for the licenses? That said, who runs the BBC? According to Wikipedia:
"It is an autonomous corporation run by a board of governors appointed by the government for a term of four years (formerly five years). This is soon to be changed to a BBC trust. Management of the organisation is in the hands of a Director-General appointed by the governors. Its domestic programming and broadcasts are funded by levying television licence fees upon the owners of television sets."
The point is that the BBC isn't funded by advertising, which you dismissed from my previous post. Therefore, unlike Fox the BBC isn't responsible to its advertisers. The cost of the adverts are dictated by ratings. Do you disagree? I fail to see your point in comparing the BBC to Fox, which are two different models. Apologies if I sounded smarmy from my OP, but I am.
You have to show what people want. If mindless entertainment is what the population demainds, then that is what you have to show. Only a mindless business who doesn't use their brains would do anything different.
This show was so dumb. It didn't even have a laugh track? How were we supposed to know when it was funny?
I am serious. This show was an example of whats wrong with the USA. It shows us that being greedy and immoral are supposedly funny and OK. 7th Heavn and Full House and the Cosby's were shows that were good for us to watch.
rickvanr said:This quote was taken from IMDb;
This person was not kidding either. He followed up with this comment;
I'm left speechless.
rickvanr said:This quote was taken from IMDb;
This person was not kidding either. He followed up with this comment;
I'm left speechless.
MattG said:Dude...seriously...I hope that guy was just being facetious. If not, it's disturbing that I have to share the planet with people like that.
Lyle said:I thought I'd read something somewhere that said that FOX has given Mitch Hurwitz permission to shop the show around to other networks. I don't know if that was merely rumor or a fact, though.
Tim Goodman said:Then again, Ligouri and Fox have apparently given approval for creator and executive producer Mitch Hurwitz to shop the series elsewhere. Which brings up the most frequently asked question:
Q: What are the chances someone else will pick up the series and save it?
rickvanr said:For all who are interested, there is a new episode of Arrested Development and Kitchen Confidential starting at 8 PM on FOX.
I'd like to further blame FOX's advertisement group for the failure of the two shows. Last night while semi-watching the Simpsons and Family Guy I caught one preview for AD and KC, while it seemed that every other commercial had an ad for Nanny 911. I just don't get it.
MattG said:You catch any of the ads for their new show, Skating With Celebrities?
Yes.
You read that correctly.
AD gets cancelled, drivel like this takes its place. A bunch of washed up actors/comedians getting trounced around on the ice with professional figure skaters. Boggles the mind.
asif786 said:I'm not sure if you guys have seen it (well, I'm sure MattG has ) but here's a little clip from David Cross talking about arrested development and why it's been cancelled:
http://live.watchmactv.com/featured/arresteddevelopment/
I guess this could be seen as shameless self-promotion..but it's relevant..
oh, and BTW it contains swearing so it's NSFW..
trebblekicked said:i don't think that was shameless self-promotion. i think that was pride, and i guarantee you won't see that kind of emotional outburst on the set of "according to jim".
MattG said:I heard about this on Fox's forums today!
While it would irk me to give the damned cable company one more dime of my money each month, if buying watching AD means buying Showtime, so be it
We at Showtime Online express our apologies; however, these pages are intended for access only from within the United States.
I just got the season 2 DVD and just realised this clip is actually in the blooper reel... haha...asif786 said:I'm not sure if you guys have seen it (well, I'm sure MattG has ) but here's a little clip from David Cross talking about arrested development and why it's been cancelled:
http://live.watchmactv.com/featured/arresteddevelopment/
I guess this could be seen as shameless self-promotion..but it's relevant..
oh, and BTW it contains swearing so it's NSFW..