Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

calsci

macrumors 6502
Nov 27, 2008
288
1
I'm happy with it but my fans kick into over drive because i only have a macbook to play on.
 

G-Force

macrumors 6502a
Nov 25, 2006
659
22
The latest updates to both Steam and Portal fixed some annoying bugs, like Steam crashing when synching to the cloud and Portal's black portal issue, they fixed that pretty quick. I've finished the game yesterday and it ran just fine on my computer. I'm happy with Steam for Mac, the only games I play are Source games so I can stop using Windows when all the games are available. Now the wait for more Source games start. ;)

Although I have some complaints, it's not that bad to be honest. It will get better with patches and we will finally have some nice games on the Mac.
 

apolloa

Suspended
Oct 21, 2008
12,318
7,802
Time, because it rules EVERYTHING!
I am extremely happy with the performance and I can't understand some of the comments on here? I have made the recommended changes and turned Vsync and Colour correction off and the FPS is great, haven't bothered measuring it but the game play's super smooth. All the other settings are at default and the screens native 1440 by 900 res.
Can't wait for the other games to come out and I also really like the new Steam interface. No more Windows for me, got rid of it and I have also got rid of my Crossover Games now which was updated to version 9 on steam's release day but it's just far too fiddley.
 

Miharu

macrumors 6502
Aug 12, 2007
381
10
Finland
I like the idea, but Portal runs pretty bad and Steam.app itself isn't following OS X guidelines, it doesn't feel like a Mac app. Also, running Portal (only game I tried) shows the game as "hl2_osx" with no menus or anything, that's not what a Mac app looks like.

I don't believe the problem lies solely with Apple's drivers, seeing as for example WoW runs very well and it's more graphically intense than Portal.
 

palebluedot

macrumors 6502a
Jun 29, 2008
738
91
I like the idea, but Portal runs pretty bad and Steam.app itself isn't following OS X guidelines, it doesn't feel like a Mac app. Also, running Portal (only game I tried) shows the game as "hl2_osx" with no menus or anything, that's not what a Mac app looks like.

I don't believe the problem lies solely with Apple's drivers, seeing as for example WoW runs very well and it's more graphically intense than Portal.

Complaining about the menu presentation and the fact Steam looks like STEAM and not like a OS X app?

/facepalm.

Apple and Open GL need to step up their game. Steam can only do so much with last gen gaming tech. I'm amazed they were able to emulate as well given the lack of D3D features that OGL 3 has (and OS X isn't even fully OG 3 compliant yet. I think 22 of the 24 modules are running).
 

Cougarcat

macrumors 604
Sep 19, 2003
7,766
2,553
I don't believe the problem lies solely with Apple's drivers, seeing as for example WoW runs very well and it's more graphically intense than Portal.

No, it's not. Portal uses a lot more fancy graphics effects than WoW does, and its system requirements are higher both for Windows and OS X.

Complaining about the menu presentation and the fact Steam looks like STEAM and not like a OS X app?

/facepalm.

Details count. That's why I, and many others, prefer OS X and natively written OS X apps. (Try to change a game icon in steam--it will bring up a windows-style file browser, complete with "file type: exe." What a joke.)

Also, nobody's saying that Steam should get aqua scrollbars and buttons. Steam can look like it does but also feel like an OS X app. Check out that mockup.
 

InfoSecmgr

Guest
Dec 31, 2009
324
0
Ypsilanti, Michigan
Bought torchlight and trying to download portal.

Torchlight has ran perfectly on my mac pro at 1920x1200. No problems whatsoever.

Can't fault them for portal though, its a free game on rollout, bound to be busy.

...Torchlight ran perfect on your 8 core Mac Pro with 12GB of RAM? Imagine that....
 

Miharu

macrumors 6502
Aug 12, 2007
381
10
Finland
Complaining about the menu presentation and the fact Steam looks like STEAM and not like a OS X app?

/facepalm.

Not only look, but feel as well. Steam for OS X is sluggish, crashes often and doesn't register all mouse clicks. All of these has been said before in this thread. Just keeping the program idle in the background takes 10% cpu power (running on 2,26 ghz core 2 duo), not to mention what a resource hog it is when browsing.

Also, most people have strange standards when it comes to gaming, people are saying Portal runs "flawlessly" when it's actually running at 15 FPS on medium settings.

At least Valve is updating constantly, it's just all the apologists who are preventing progression from being made by claiming everything is perfect and resorting to personal insults.
 

Mackilroy

macrumors 68040
Jun 29, 2006
3,956
686
Not only look, but feel as well. Steam for OS X is sluggish, crashes often and doesn't register all mouse clicks. All of these has been said before in this thread. Just keeping the program idle in the background takes 10% cpu power (running on 2,26 ghz core 2 duo), not to mention what a resource hog it is when browsing.

Also, most people have strange standards when it comes to gaming, people are saying Portal runs "flawlessly" when it's actually running at 15 FPS on medium settings.

At least Valve is updating constantly, it's just all the apologists who are preventing progression from being made by claiming everything is perfect and resorting to personal insults.
And on the other side of things, all the whiners apparently believe that everyone else has an identical experience to them, even if they say otherwise, and if they do say otherwise they're obviously lying. ;)

Two sides to every coin, dude. I haven't had a single issue with Steam.
 

roadbloc

macrumors G3
Aug 24, 2009
8,784
215
UK
The fact that we have actually have Steam for mac is good enough for me. I couldn't care less what it looks like or how it works.
To them who say it is bloated and buggy, its new and it will be. But Steam for PC is certainly no better.

I think them who are complaining need to stop. I think we are very privileged indeed to have Steam come to Mac, and we don't want to appear ungrateful now do we?
 

allfunandgames

macrumors member
Mar 24, 2010
47
2
Auckland, New Zealand
Disappointed? Not at all!
Gaming on the Mac is better than it has ever been thanks to Steam for Mac.

No one is forcing people to use it...if it is so bad then just keep using bootcamp/crossover/cider/whatever.
 

BobHail

macrumors 6502a
May 15, 2009
619
0
The fact that we have actually have Steam for mac is good enough for me. I couldn't care less what it looks like or how it works.
To them who say it is bloated and buggy, its new and it will be. But Steam for PC is certainly no better.

I think them who are complaining need to stop. I think we are very privileged indeed to have Steam come to Mac, and we don't want to appear ungrateful now do we?

Steam wins the "buggiest software" title on OS X!

I think they should have worked on it more, before releasing bad quality like this.

Hopefully it will get better though and be worthy of the OS X platform.
 

VPrime

macrumors 68000
Dec 19, 2008
1,722
86
London Ontario
I wish valve made it an extended closed beta to all those with accounts already. Maybe then there would be less whining on why it doesn't look pretty and give actual feedback on what is broken!

To those saying the file manager portions are windows like -They will probably be changed! That is NOT a key component of steam, so I am guessing they threw in what works and worry about the looks later.


The overall "Feel" of the app, will not change. It is steam. It is your gateway to games. They want it to be very separate from the operating system. That being said, future updates will probably tie it in with the OS better... Again things like the file manager windows.
Just submit the feedback to valve, and focus on the big picture - Games are now available for mac. It is a bumpy start but it can only get bette... No, it WILL get better!
Submit bug reports, and don't complain!

There is feedback, and then there is useless whining.
 

CylonGlitch

macrumors 68030
Jul 7, 2009
2,956
268
Nashville
I was playing with Steam on the PC yesterday, it works almost exactly like Steam on the Mac. I have never liked the interface to Steam, I don't think it is that good, but it works and does what it is supposed to do... so I'm quite happy with it.
 

0098386

Suspended
Jan 18, 2005
21,574
2,908
Also, most people have strange standards when it comes to gaming, people are saying Portal runs "flawlessly" when it's actually running at 15 FPS on medium settings.

I'm getting 40-60fps here. Under the exact same settings on Windows I get 50-60fps, but I'd put that down to better drivers and overclocking. I'd say it runs flawlessly here. If it plummeted to 15fps I would call that a flaw.
 

Sambo110

macrumors 68000
Mar 12, 2007
1,686
0
Australia
I'm getting 40-60fps here. Under the exact same settings on Windows I get 50-60fps, but I'd put that down to better drivers and overclocking. I'd say it runs flawlessly here. If it plummeted to 15fps I would call that a flaw.

My frame rate went ridiculously low, under 10, when there was a lot of water on screen.
 

sammich

macrumors 601
Sep 26, 2006
4,305
268
Sarcasmville.
Steam works. It's just not smooth to scroll around in. That's my only real gripe.

...Torchlight ran perfect on your 8 core Mac Pro with 12GB of RAM? Imagine that....

Torchlight runs flawlessly+smooth on my 3.5 year old MBP, 1680x1050, everything on max (the settings it had when I started it up the first time).
 

skunkworker

macrumors regular
Sep 9, 2007
182
20
Once they fix the built in open/save dialog for accessing the system and replace it with the Mac OS X one, I will be happy. To everyone saying how disappointing it is, its still in beta and they are still heavily working on it. Its loads better launch then the original steam for windows, that was horrible.
 

gumbyx84

macrumors 6502
Dec 7, 2008
491
0
Once they fix the built in open/save dialog for accessing the system and replace it with the Mac OS X one, I will be happy. To everyone saying how disappointing it is, its still in beta and they are still heavily working on it. Its loads better launch then the original steam for windows, that was horrible.

Its no longer in beta..... It runs as if it is, but its not. Valve would be better served to call this an open-beta then an out-right release.

Anyway, I agree with you that this is running better then the Steam Windows launch. I know its because its based on the mature Steam for Windows, but being of many that gave up Valve games when Steam first cam out, I am happy with it.

My frame rate went ridiculously low, under 10, when there was a lot of water on screen.

When does Portal have any water areas? Color me confused.
 

zp3dd4

macrumors member
Jun 21, 2009
83
0
he means the acid in some levels. They also slow down my mac a lot.. I really hope that 10.6.4 improves significantly on drivers so that at least the OpenGl performance is on par with Windows, as I see no reason why it wouldn't be.
 

mixel

macrumors 68000
Jan 12, 2006
1,730
976
Leeds, UK
I wonder if acid pool slowdown is an ATI specific thing? It doesn't happen on either of my nvidia GPU'd Macs.
 

SchneiderMan

macrumors G3
May 25, 2008
8,332
202
I can say that Steam is way better on Windows. Every time I open up Steam it downloads an update or something and it's getting very annoying.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.