They're obviously both transparent and with a better image quality. Transparent is a setting in iOS 21.2
They can be used to hack doors as well.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iPhone 7 May Feature Thinner, Waterproof Body With No Headphone Jack and Wireless Charging
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
They're obviously both transparent and with a better image quality. Transparent is a setting in iOS 21.2
They can be used to hack doors as well.
Got burned once already. Now I have all these expensive horse shoes that are not compatible with my model T
I let Ford slide on that one. Fool me once shame on.., I forget how that goes but Apple will not get away with it this time.
We shall seek revenge!!
I let Ford slide on that one. Fool me once shame on.., I forget how that goes but Apple will not get away with it this time.
We shall seek revenge!!
I'd imagine if it got really thin it would become easier to operate with one hand.
Waterproofing, wonder if that means higher repair costs?
Sounds interesting though I like it. Best would be in a 5S size.
Waterproofing, wonder if that means higher repair costs?
Sounds interesting though I like it. Best would be in a 5S size.
Further, having a powered port like Lightning (though I believe it will actually be USB C) offers the advantage of performing other types of audio processing; ambient noise cancellation being one of many. Not having to deal with a battery in a headphone with that feature would be huge.
Of course that comes with a consequence of draining an iPhone's battery somewhat - the devil is in the details, i.e. how much.
Absolutely! I can name a few reasons: 1) From now on iPhones will not include earphones out of the box. 2) Lightning to 3.5 mm adapter will be sold for $30. 3) Lightning ready Beats earphones will be promoted heavily and most people will end up buying them instead of buying the adapter. 4) Some people will buy both the adapter and the lightning earphones.
Add the savings of not including an earphone with the iPhone to the income generated from the sale of the 3.5 mm adapter and the Lightning Beats earphones then multiply it with the number of iPhones to be sold. Ingenious!
But again, that is nothing that can't already be accomplished today. I guess maybe if they include new apple earbuds in the box that connect via lightning (no way it will be usb-c) and include the DAC and noise processing to block out background noise without any external battery, people might eventually be won over, but I still think that going to a proprietary connection for headphones which people are used to be able to use with nearly any device is really going to irritate people.
I never said or implied foldable did I?
I never specified how thin. I just said too thin. Fact.
There will come a point where holding it whether too thin or too thick becomes uncomfortable. Fact.
Don’t be clever - you end up looking even more stupid.
OK? Doesn't change the fact that there isn't anything available that IS an improvement over the 3.5 jack.
Smaller or thinner? Maybe. But other than that, a 3.5 jack is able to handle passing the highest fidelity audio formats as well as any other jack.
The controversy is that I and many others still have plenty of gear (headphones and otherwise) that uses the 3.5 jack to connect. Maybe Apple will include a free adapter but I seriously doubt it. And their replacement isn't necessarily going to improve sound quality or anything else, it's not a better connection, just different and in my case much less convenient. Nothing manufactured or faux about it.
I know you're being a smartass but you just give the impression that you don't understand how digital or analog audio work.
Don't get me wrong, I love my iPhone 6s Plus, but I'll never understand why Apple sactrifices practicality for thinness. Who REALLY cares about how thin their device is? If I buy a computer I want it to have a built-in CD/BluRay drive. If I buy a smart phone I want to be able to plug in headphones if I want to. These products are not cheap. I don't want to be forced to buy USB external devices or adapters for everything
There's a cheap, easy, great sounding alternative already (3.5).
So let's make it go away in favor of something inferior on all three counts!
Yay?
It's not that proprietary. Several manufacturers already offer Lightning headphones. When Apple's change becomes official, count on a ton more. Apple will be driving the market.
That said, I really think the connection will be USB C rather than Lightening. That would align well with where laptop/desktop computers are going, especially Apple's.
Am I a dinosaur for charging my iPhone, while using it, while listening to headphones almost every night?
Thin sells, but most importantly it also forces more efficient components and techniques out of the engineers, which leads to better products (and new product lines) in the long run.
If it wasn't for Apple's drive for thinness and the solution was to just slap a bigger battery on each time, we'd all be carrying round bricks in our pockets like we were in the 1980's.
I use Bose noise cancelling headphones at night. If they provide an adaptor to accommodate 3.5mm jacked headphones then fine. Not interested in spending another $300+ to replace them. So it's up to Apple whether I'm back in the phone market again.. Really don't care about a thinner phone. The 6s is fine for my needs with it's current thickness.
Well, for all of you who think those of us who want to keep the headphone jack, we are not alone.
http://9to5mac.com/2016/01/08/lightning-headphone-petition/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+9To5Mac-MacAllDay+(9+to+5+Mac+-+Apple+Intelligence)
Petition to keep the headphone jack
http://9to5mac.com/2016/01/08/lightning-headphone-petition/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+9To5Mac-MacAllDay+(9+to+5+Mac+-+Apple+Intelligence)
Petition to keep the headphone jack
That petition is so cute! Wonder how much data will be mined from people "signing" it?
In the end it will have absolutely zero effect.
This is the very definition of proprietary. Those Lightning headphones had to be certified in the Made for iPhone (MFI) process. You can't built a lightning headphone without paying licensing fees and Apple's permission to do so. They can easily lock you out (like those cheap chinese Lightning cables that have been blocked with an iOS update). That won't be possible with USB C as long as the headphone matches the standard, it will work.
I don't know if Apple can really drive the market towards Lightning headphones. And i don't know if they could achieve some sort of cross compatibility with USB/C, which could be going the same route for Audio. At least with USB C you would switch from the universal 3,5mm to another universal standard. Last april i was sure, that we won't see Apple implementing Lightning into their Macbooks. But after the last introduction of Lightning charged peripherals (keyboard, trackpad, siri remote...) i'm not so sure any more.
Yes, but that's Apple's marketing. The fact is, the audio jack is still a port. Actually considering this rumor, it's interesting that Apple completely ignores it. It takes up a huge amount of valuable room on an ultra-thin notebook, where they could otherwise have out a second USB-C port and offered more customers a better value. But they picked their battles here. I guarantee if this current rumor is true, Apple designed the MacBook with a 17-pin Lightning port where that 3.5mm Jack is, but decided they couldn't implement it until they made the move on the iPhone, which might have been set for the 6, but Apple decided that was too early.
It's really not that much bigger than Lightning, which seems to be its only advantage (besides licensing fees for Apple and that's probably the reason, why this scenario won't happen):
![USB-C-vs-Lightning-port-size-dimension-comparison-graphic]()
Actually it's quite a bit bigger than Lightning, not just height and width, but primarily depth. So it's easily 2-3x the internal volume, which seems to be the mistake most are making by judging the diameter of the 3.5mm opening compared to Lightning dimensions. Also, USB-C is more fragile, with an insertable plastic tongue subject to breaking off under strain. And USB-C is far from gurantees that it will be the connector of the future. Apple controls Lightning, and could keep it around for its mobile devices and peripherals long after the USB-C connector has been replaced by the latest greatest thing. For something like audio, Lightning provides a much more stable option. Moreover, Apple doesn't really allow desktop peripherals to be used with iOS devices now. So why would they encourage a common port for desktop and mobile accessories, which will likely be incompatible and may cause confusion? I would rather expect to see the ability to use iOS adapters on a Mac than vice versa, and adding a tiny Lightning port to a Mac a much easier prospect than the larger and more complex USB-C to a mobile device.
Others are correct in pointing out that there's no reason to remove the 3.5mm Jack to use an external Lightning DAC now. Of course Apple will likely equate the removal of it with higher quality audio, as they enable Lightning to natively support an external DAC more easily. But the biggest benifit is that increased demand for DAC dongles will increase competition and dramatically lower the prices. So for much less money, there will be a much greater variety of choice, at much lower prices, greater compatibility, and more ergonomic designs. So overall it's a good move for making higher quality audio available to more people.
Of course you can.
you forgot the biggest advantage being the precise matching of DAC/amp to the actual headphone drivers. No longer does the crossover for perhaps multi-driver phones need to be analog and a pure sink to ground power consumer but may be done in digital without loss of power and with higher order filters with lower phase shift.
the negative though is every time you buy a pair of headphones you are buying all of this stuff you used to not be buying making the cost of headphones go up but in the end it is all in the name of customizing that circuit for the drivers at your ear. in theory they 'should' sound much better.
Apple isn't trying to drive the market towards Lightning audio. They're trying to drive the market toward wireless audio. And that's the mistake you and the competition are making. USB-C is far from being a universal standard. It's only the 5th iteration in the evolution of the USB port. And as Samsung and Android race to include it on their phones, in 3-5 years, if not sooner there will likely be a new, better one. This is fine for desktops, but bad for audio.
However, as usual, once the competition realizes what Apple's true target is, they will benifit from the wireless audio demand Apple has created by removing the 3.5mm Jack and the resulting better products, and lower prices. So in the end it won't matter if they have an outdated USB-C port, but their customers who bought USB-C headphones, instead of an adapter, might be a little upset.
[doublepost=1452268662][/doublepost]
Exactly this. And as I point out, because of the increased demand, the quality of the products will go up, while the prices come down, due to increased competition, so your latter concern will be substantially mitigated.
Right now the DAC in the iPhone is a generic one that accommodates whatever is plugged into it. But who better to chose the DAC for their hardware than the headphone/speaker makers? Apple now only has to be responsible for the source playback, not the sound quality. This also applies to Bluetooth headphones as well.
Last edited:
Headphones through the jack are how I roll: I use them on phone calls, watching movies and listening to music while commuting. Not a fan of clunky big headphones either.
I am happy with my 6s... so no 7 for me.
I am happy with my 6s... so no 7 for me.
I have small hands and the problem with the 6S is not the thinness that makes it difficult to hold, it's the width. If they made iPhone thinner but also narrower then it would be easy to hold even for me.