Thinner and lighter instead of improving battery life. Classic.
Gods just reading it makes me do a facepalm, it even sounds so dramatic!Apple may use to save space internally and shave off precious, fractions of a millimetre from the device's size.
For goodness sake. We need better battery life and not thinner phones! How hard is that to understand?
Wouldn't it be kind of cool if they removed the camera and all the physical buttons to make it thinner, but like you could buy them as lightning addons. I'll write tim
Maybe in the 2017 10th Anniversary iPhone.Yet where is this creativity when it comes to battery tech?
Rumors have suggested the iPhone 7 will be thinner and lighter than the iPhone 6s
Can you list the specific innovations that Apple produced in the days of Apple being the leader in innovation?Microsoft is putting its money on the big things, VR, bots, augmented reality and cloud while the only obsession that Apple seems to have these days is thinness over functionality.
The days of Apple being the leader in innovation is long gone, people.
What is bad in making non-battery components thinner? Would you rather have an iPhone that is 50% thicker and 50% heavier with the same battery life? Apple picks a battery life and then makes the device as thin as possible. Making non-battery components thicker won't make Apple choose a different battery life. Apple certainly has enough usage data to know what percentage of its users get by with charging the device once per day. Apple might have an internal goal of X% of its users making it through the day with a single charge. How thin the antenna is won't change that goal.Thinner and lighter instead of improving battery life. Classic.
I hope that's the jokeGods just reading it makes me do a facepalm, it even sounds so dramatic!